Trinity vs. Oneness

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Are you Trinitarian, or Sabellian (Oneness, usually, Oneness Pentecostal)?

  • Trinitarian

    Votes: 45 77.6%
  • Sabellion

    Votes: 6 10.3%
  • What's the difference?

    Votes: 7 12.1%

  • Total voters
    58
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
If God was judging spiritual rulers (the gods) whom He had given authority over the earth, is that not what He is doing physically with the earthly rulers (the gods) who were given authority as well? God cannot have children by sexual intercourse. That is of the world. We are to become children the same way Jesus did by that same miracle and power. A spirit cannot conceive by intercourse and this is why we were made. To do that in the flesh. Jesus is also adopted and to deny this is to deny that He came in the flesh. That fleshly part of Him was born of a woman and adopted as a Son.
By spiritual rulers I was not speaking of angelic or demonic beings but of those who are given responsiblity for the spiritual training and guidance of others.

This issue of the incarnation and deity of Christ is the greatest gulf between us.
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,345
2,157
113
Hi Phil, We must approach it using common sense as well. He had glory along with the Father, not as a seperate being, but in the image of the Father. Remember, the Father is Spirit, glorified in that image. The image, being glorified as well, because it was the form of that Spirit. Now if the Son was eternal with the Father as you explain it, there had to be atleast two seperate beings which would make verses in the Old testament false. The only way for both statements to coincide with each other is that the Father, in the OT manifested Himself in the image of the Son as no man saw the true face of the Father. But remember, that image wasn't the Son until the birth of Jesus. Before then, this image spoke as the Father. The Word was God.
Hi Israel,

Thanks for you reply, However you never actually answered the question?

You are very correct in saying that the Father and Son are not separate beings, for that would make Jesus a separate God, that is false. they are one yet three persons sharing the same attributes as scripture testifies.

It would be nice to see an answer using scripture to my question rather than mans/your ''common sense''

Many thanks

Phil
 
R

Ricke

Guest
Oneness/ Trinity Conflict?

All.

This thread is simply to explain what Our Bibles already teaches regarding The Deity of God. I will not approach this with anything but genuine Christian Love and Concern for all and not an "US versus THEM attitude". Just study and read what I am about to Post based on The Scriptures alone. And please, do not tell us about this person of well renown said in 225 AD or what some well known "Religious Authority" has stated or written on the internet. Simply stay within atheists context of Scriptures is that Fair enough for everyone?

If we do this in a peaceable way, we can then have effective dialog and hopefully accomplish something here. If not, then if anyone wants to malign the others please stay out of the discussion, especially for the benefit of the Newbies on Christianchat...........

GOD IS A SPIRIT ( John 4 v 24)

God the Creator, is Omnipresent, who's eternal Spirit fills The Heavens and The Earth. There is no place in His creation where His Spirit does not Dwell.

A Spirit cannot Die, nor cannot Shed Human Blood. God in Spirit never had a beginning nor will he have an end. In Hebrews 7 v 3 it states this. Someone ready mentioned to me that. Eternal refers to Melchizedek the High Priest of Salem ( now Jerusalem) and it certainly does. But you need to understand that Melchizedek was a Theopony ( Instant Human Form) created by The eternal God. He also created another Theopony of himself in Human Form in Genesis 18 when God Appeared unto Abraham with Two Angels before they destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. Notice both Theoponies of God were unto Abraham; Melchizedek in Genesis 14 , and In Genesis 18.
These Theoponies were not Jesus. God can do whatever he wants; including creating himself in a Fleshly body instantly without using a Human such as Mary.

In The OT God was called "Jehovah" and "Yahweh" and "Lord" among the most popular names. God was never referred to as " The Father" in The OT. The title "Father" began in The NT.

The Spirit of the One Lord/ One God of all eternity is now referred to as " The Father" in today's Lexicon.

God knows the end from the beginning. One way to understand that; God knew before he created Earth he would create Humanity with the sole purpose of having people who would Love and Worship him daily, and he in return would Love and protect them they would live forever right here on Earth, never die, never have any problems, no sickness, no fussing and fighting, a Paradise, with a perfect environment. Not too Hot or Too Cold, just perfect in every way. Before God created the Garden of Eden and Made Adam and Eve, he already knew what was going to happen before they disobeyed Him. He knew Satan would win The Spiritual battle in round #1 at Eden. In his mind he also knew thousands of years in Advance, he would have to create a Body to. Come our atonement at Calvary. His ownself In a Human body he would name Jesus.

Why would God have to create a Human Body (Jesus) for our atonement? Simply because The sacrifice had to be Spotless, without Blemish just like in the OT where the animals sacrificed had to be chosen the same way. The difference being; an animal was chosen for it's outward appearance, and a Human sacrifice had to be Spiritually Spotless and without blemish.

God knew before creation, humanity would fail to ever be able to be Spotless or without Spot. This is why God himself created his own Fleshly body, rather then have an everyday Human created to be the Sin Sacrifice.

God did not create A Theopony like he did in Genesis 14 and Genesis 18. The reason being it had to be fully Human to fulfill the role of The Testator. The Theopony was certainly human in form because it could eat food ( Genesis 18 v 8) but the Theopony it had to be fully Human to meet the Requirements.;

Galatians 4 v 4 ; "But when the fullness of the time had come, God ( The Father/ The Spirit) sent forth ,HIS SON ( his created fleshly body) , made of a Woman, made under the Law"
The law of Humanity of nature. Birth through conception with a Female.

THE THREE PERSON mis understanding.

So we read in I TIMOTHY 3 V 16 " Great is The MYSTERY of Godliness, GOD ( the Father/ The eternal One Lord, One God) was manifest in The flesh...." .....not as a Theopony, but as a little Baby who would have a "dual nature" unlike any baby ever born then or even now. Who because he was born fully human, would one day would represent all future mankind at Calvary. So the question is this; did God create another "person" who would be independent have his own personality and personality separate from The Father / The Spirit??

The answer is No, he did not. Unlike all the Males on here, Jesus and the Father are one and The same One Lord/ One God.The "Son" was under full guidance and Spiritual Control of The " Father" unlike a normal "Son" who might be controlled by his biological Human Father, to a certain point, then as the son of that Father grows up and has his own ideas, desires, thinking etc etc. No so with Jesus...he followed to the end without fail whatever The Spirit side of his dual nature was teaching him to do

SON ...refers to The fleshly creation of God not a separate deity, or person as it would be with A normal Biological Father/ Biological Mother .

FATHER.....refers to The Lord/ One God of creation who is a SPIRIT.

THE HOLY GHOST/ HOLY SPIRIT.....are the same Spirit
Please read I Corinthians 12 v 13/ Ephesians 4 v 4. The Holy Ghost is not person #3 in a Godhead. There is only ONE SPIRIT and that SPIRIT originates and in fact is the The eternal Spirit of The One Lord/ One God. Whom we call The Father.

Let me try to simply show all of us how to figurecout what Jesus is saying in Scripture regarding " The Father" or a"My Father" ...simply substitute mentally the word SPIRIT when you see the Word " Father",...and just as simply substitute the word FLESH where you see the Word "Son" or where Jesus is talking about "The Father" as he speaks in The scripture. Just always remember FLESH is Jesus/ SPIRIT is Father./ Holy Ghost is One Spirit in in The Father.

OK break time I have Church to attend... I will post this, and we can discuss ok....no arguments or quotes please...just discuss scripture. God Bless everyone......Rick.
 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
Re: Oneness/ Trinity Conflict?

All.

This thread is simply to explain what Our Bibles already teaches regarding The Deity of God..

People learn from the bible, but the Holy Spirit is the teacher.
 
D

Dmurray

Guest
Re: Oneness/ Trinity Conflict?

People learn from the bible, but the Holy Spirit is the teacher.
I thought Jesus was our Teacher?
And the Holy Spirit is our Guidance?
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
Re: Oneness/ Trinity Conflict?

It is a true statement that Oneness Pentecostals have a conflict with what scripture says. They are in error.
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
Re: Oneness/ Trinity Conflict?

This is what you said as you planned this thread:
"All
What we see here is several who have a clear understanding of just Who God is. And several who cannot see this, so the debate goes on and on. Those who understand this;
Myself

mpaper345

studentofgod

DMurray

Forerunner......"


To you it makes no difference what we have to say on the matter.

I plan on answering you point for point, but I realize it is only for the sake of the innocent. Oneness theology is your shibboleth.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
Re: Oneness/ Trinity Conflict?

They have stumbled badly. Striving with the stiff necked heretic out of love never ends until they have gone reprobate. Then there's no more point. We aren't even close in my opinion to that though. In any event, as Captain Redlegs said in 'The Oulaw Jose Wales,' "Doing good has no end." ;)

The quote was strictly for levity. God bless.

This is what you said as you planned this thread:
"All
What we see here is several who have a clear understanding of just Who God is. And several who cannot see this, so the debate goes on and on. Those who understand this;
Myself

mpaper345

studentofgod

DMurray

Forerunner......"

To you it makes no difference what we have to say on the matter.

I plan on answering you point for point, but I realize it is only for the sake of the innocent. Oneness theology is your shibboleth.
 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
Re: Oneness/ Trinity Conflict?

I thought Jesus was our Teacher?
And the Holy Spirit is our Guidance?
"But when He, the Spirit of truth, comes, He will guide you into all the truth;"

And as for you, the anointing which you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need for anyone to teach you; but as His anointing teaches you about all things, and is true and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you abide in Him.

The point is that the bible does not teach. The bible is a resource that the Holy Spirit uses to teach us all truth, and above all to abide in Christ.
 
S

Shwagga

Guest
Re: Oneness/ Trinity Conflict?

Two Quick Apologetic Tips on the Trinity
10/07/2009 - Alan Kurschner
The two most frequent objections to the Trinity can be illuminated with two simple, but effective, illustrations.

First, "How can there be three and one at the same time"? This question conflates two categories into one. But Christians understand that there are two categories involved. There is one "What" (Being/Deity) and three "Who's" (Persons/Father-Son-Holy Spirit).

Here is the best illustration that I think brings out this fundamental difference in these two categories that unbelievers can immediately relate to: There is only one humanity (Being) but many individuals (persons). Individuals share in the Being of humanity, and that does not mean that I am you, and you are me — we are different persons with the same single Being.

This illustration is not intended to exhaust or explain all the elements of the Trinity; instead, it serves to illustrate this single categorical difference between Being and persons. Someone may object by saying, "Does not this analogy support polytheism, since there are billions of individuals, there can be billions of Gods or divine persons?" Let me be clear: this illustration is intended to show a single distinction between two categories — Being and persons; the point is not intended to show how many persons there are. Only Scripture can provide us this latter truth.

Next, believers are often not as aware of this second most frequent assumption that unbelievers have about the Trinity. But if you are aware of this deep assumption by those who deny the deity of Christ, you can disarm them, aiding them to the vista of Trinitarianism.

Memorize and internalize the following Trinitarian truth:
Difference in function does not indicate inferiority of nature.
That is James White's statement and it will go a very long way in your Trinitarian apologetics.

There is a built-in assumption for many that if Jesus has a lesser role than the Father, he must therefore have a lesser nature. This is an illogical inference. Those who oppose the deity of Christ point to Jesus' submissive remarks about doing the will of his Father. For example, Jesus says, "the Father is greater than I am." They infer from this that Jesus does not share the same nature with the Father (this ignores that the context is talking about their relational roles, not their nature, John 14). Jesus also calls the Father, "My God." Yet those who oppose the deity of Christ ignore that this is a humble acknowledgment of the Incarnate Jesus, modeling for us humility and submissiveness (John 20:17). This exalting affirmation is exactly what we would expect from the Son of God.

Similarly, since Jesus is the agent of the Father in many respects such as the Creation, therefore Jesus cannot be fully God. And regarding the Spirit, they will make the similar false assumption: Since the Spirit is sent by the Father, the Spirit cannot have the same divine nature as the Father. Again, they will look at these statements and make the fallacious leap that difference in function indicates inferiority of nature.

By doing so, they also deny the freedom of the Divine persons to choose their roles. Or to put it another way: they assume that to be truly God, the Son and the Spirit must have the exact same roles as the Father. Do not allow them to accept this assumption. Probe them to ensure they see this point.

So a simple, but effective, illustration will show that difference in function does not indicate inferiority of nature: A husband and wife will have different roles in a marriage. Wives are to take on the submissive role, but this does not indicate that difference in function requires inferiority of nature. Does the wife have a lesser nature than that of the husband? Of course not. They both are fully human.

I hope these two simple illustrations will be staples when you come across these frequent assumptions. The former illustration depicts the difference between Being and persons; the latter illustration depicts the difference between Being and functions.

Let's praise God for the Incarnation, which itself presupposes a submissive role that brought about our salvation. We do not worship a unipersonal-Unitarian God, but instead a complementary-Trinitarian God.


Source: Two Quick Apologetic Tips on the Trinity
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
Re: Oneness/ Trinity Conflict?

GOD IS A SPIRIT ( John 4 v 24)

God the Creator, is Omnipresent, who's eternal Spirit fills The Heavens and The Earth. There is no place in His creation where His Spirit does not Dwell.
God is a Spirit (John 4:24), Infinite in Time (Exodus 15:18) and Space (Rev 4:8-10), One (Exodus 20:3), Omnipotent (Isaiah 40:12-15), Omnipresent (Psalms 139:7-10), Omniscient (Psalms 139:1-16), Wise (Psalms 104:24), Sovereign (Roman 9:21), Holy (Revelation 4:8), Righteous (Genesis 18:25), Faithful (I Corinth 1:9), Merciful (Titus 3:5), Love (I John 3:1), and Good (Psalms 145:9). None of these attributes are instinctive.

A Spirit cannot Die, nor cannot Shed Human Blood.
Depends upon what you mean by "die". If you mean death the way we die, I would disagree. Since we are spirit and we die. As to the second, do you mean that the spirit has no blood or that they cannot caused blood to be shed. The first bears nothing on the argument and the second I would disagree with.
God in Spirit never had a beginning nor will he have an end. In Hebrews 7 v 3 it states this. Someone ready mentioned to me that. Eternal refers to Melchizedek the High Priest of Salem ( now Jerusalem) and it certainly does. But you need to understand that Melchizedek was a Theopony ( Instant Human Form) created by The eternal God. He also created another Theopony of himself in Human Form in Genesis 18 when God Appeared unto Abraham with Two Angels before they destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. Notice both Theoponies of God were unto Abraham; Melchizedek in Genesis 14 , and In Genesis 18.
These Theoponies were not Jesus. God can do whatever he wants; including creating himself in a Fleshly body instantly without using a Human such as Mary.

In The OT God was called "Jehovah" and "Yahweh" and "Lord" among the most popular names. God was never referred to as " The Father" in The OT. The title "Father" began in The NT.
This is incorrect. While it is uncommon, it is not unknown in the OT, notably Isaiah 9:8.
The Spirit of the One Lord/ One God of all eternity is now referred to as " The Father" in today's Lexicon.
This is a presumption. If you want to present some verses to support this.

God knows the end from the beginning. One way to understand that; God knew before he created Earth he would create Humanity with the sole purpose of having people who would Love and Worship him daily, and he in return would Love and protect them they would live forever right here on Earth, never die, never have any problems, no sickness, no fussing and fighting, a Paradise, with a perfect environment. Not too Hot or Too Cold, just perfect in every way. Before God created the Garden of Eden and Made Adam and Eve, he already knew what was going to happen before they disobeyed Him. He knew Satan would win The Spiritual battle in round #1 at Eden. In his mind he also knew thousands of years in Advance, he would have to create a Body to. Come our atonement at Calvary. His ownself In a Human body he would name Jesus.
This is again a presumption, that the Father would come and occupy a human body (a very slanted view of incarnation) and name the human body separately from the soul that was in it. Also, your illustration of his omniscience is flawed as He knew from all eternity that He would send His only Son.

Why would God have to create a Human Body (Jesus) for our atonement? Simply because The sacrifice had to be Spotless, without Blemish just like in the OT where the animals sacrificed had to be chosen the same way. The difference being; an animal was chosen for it's outward appearance, and a Human sacrifice had to be Spiritually Spotless and without blemish.
The twist here again is that you are making Him create some lump of flesh to occupy, only to abandon on the cross. Thus God does not make atonement, man does and not even a full man at that.

God knew before creation, humanity would fail to ever be able to be Spotless or without Spot. This is why God himself created his own Fleshly body, rather then have an everyday Human created to be the Sin Sacrifice.
Since we were "in the loins" of Adam, we sinned with him. What was needed was a sacrifice that could bear the sins of the entire human race upon His shoulder. There had to be something more than a personal transportation body. In the cross we have atonement, propitiaion, substitution, redemption and reconciliation. The only One who could bear all and accomplish all is God Himself, for only He is Holy.

God did not create A Theopony like he did in Genesis 14 and Genesis 18. The reason being it had to be fully Human to fulfill the role of The Testator. The Theopony was certainly human in form because it could eat food ( Genesis 18 v 8) but the Theopony it had to be fully Human to meet the Requirements.;
The testator is the maker of a covenant. If the New Covenant is a covenant between God and man, then it cannot be made by a man. Jesus said "This is the New Covenant in my blood." That means that if Jesus' "God nature" did not die on the cross, the New Covenant is nothing more that an agreement between men and has no eternal consequences. but if the covenant is between God and man, then God is the Testator and that New Covenant has to be in the "blood" of God Himself. (P.S. It is spelled Theophany.)

Galatians 4 v 4 ; "But when the fullness of the time had come, God ( The Father/ The Spirit) sent forth ,HIS SON ( his created fleshly body) , made of a Woman, made under the Law"
The law of Humanity of nature. Birth through conception with a Female.
I think you mean conception by a female as conception with a female would require intercourse.

THE THREE PERSON mis understanding.

So we read in I TIMOTHY 3 V 16 " Great is The MYSTERY of Godliness, GOD ( the Father/ The eternal One Lord, One God) was manifest in The flesh...." .....not as a Theopony, but as a little Baby who would have a "dual nature" unlike any baby ever born then or even now.
The issue is not the "dual nature" of Jesus as much as the separablility of natures. The Bible does not support the separablility of the two natures.
Who because he was born fully human, would one day would represent all future mankind at Calvary. So the question is this; did God create another "person" who would be independent have his own personality and personality separate from The Father / The Spirit??
I agree. God the Son existed from all eternity. He was not created, though He was miraculously begotten.

The answer is No, he did not. Unlike all the Males on here, Jesus and the Father are one and The same One Lord/ One God.
You are stating this without support. Jesus spoke to and of the Father as a separate person. If the Father is God and the Son is God, then we have a compound unity for God is One.
The "Son" was under full guidance and Spiritual Control of The " Father" unlike a normal "Son" who might be controlled by his biological Human Father, to a certain point, then as the son of that Father grows up and has his own ideas, desires, thinking etc etc. No so with Jesus...he followed to the end without fail whatever The Spirit side of his dual nature was teaching him to do

SON ...refers to The fleshly creation of God not a separate deity, or person as it would be with A normal Biological Father/ Biological Mother .
I agree, there is no separation of diety, but I disagree in that there is clearly a separation of person.

FATHER.....refers to The Lord/ One God of creation who is a SPIRIT.
I am also a spirit, but that does not mean that I am the Holy Spirit. Spirit is a discriptive word that is not exclusive to the Father.

THE HOLY GHOST/ HOLY SPIRIT.....are the same Spirit
Please read I Corinthians 12 v 13/ Ephesians 4 v 4. The Holy Ghost is not person #3 in a Godhead. There is only ONE SPIRIT and that SPIRIT originates and in fact is the The eternal Spirit of The One Lord/ One God. Whom we call The Father.

Let me try to simply show all of us how to figurecout what Jesus is saying in Scripture regarding " The Father" or a"My Father" ...simply substitute mentally the word SPIRIT when you see the Word " Father",...and just as simply substitute the word FLESH where you see the Word "Son" or where Jesus is talking about "The Father" as he speaks in The scripture. Just always remember FLESH is Jesus/ SPIRIT is Father./ Holy Ghost is One Spirit in in The Father.
If Jesus wanted to speak of His spirit, that is what he would have said. In addition, He call the Spirit "another Comforter", separating Himself from the Holy Spirit.

OK break time I have Church to attend... I will post this, and we can discuss ok....no arguments or quotes please...just discuss scripture. God Bless everyone......Rick.
Sorry to break your rules, but if you and the others of your list of acceptable opinions would like to discuss this in PM, you are welcome to or start your own website
 
Last edited:
1

1still_waters

Guest
Re: Oneness/ Trinity Conflict?

Ok dude we have open threads on the main part of the bible discussion board on the trinity and oneness related stuff. We don't need more. I'll be merging this with one of those threads.
 
R

Ricke

Guest
David
You as usual have done a great job of Perverting the scripture such as claiming ; I am a Spirit" sure you are David, and I am Humpty Dumpty and I was pushed.

You people just want to argue. And when you get cornered you pervert to get out.I am trying to explain to others about The oneness, you don't like it so whatever it takes you'll find a way to pervert things because your mind is closed, and you know everything already, and case closed. OK but did you ever think about others who may want to decide for themselves, with their own brain.?

You even perverted to the readers what air said regarding those I listed who know Oneness.cabs because your name was not mentioned you claim I Blacklisted you and others..Go re-read what I actually dId David, I simply said the list of names are those Who know the Oneness. your name simply was not mentioned because you beleive Trinity has nothing to do with Blacklisting you or anyone else. Get your facts straight before you spread your poison.
 
R

Ricke

Guest
AOK

"Pentecostals are in Error on Scripture" thus saith the word of AOK chapter One through the entire book because that is what he has been Brainwashed with. Why don't we discuss The RCC which you belong to, want to discuss them AOK?

Let's talk about them....c'Mon I am ready to discuss them.
 
R

Ricke

Guest
The entire Trinity beleif was never taught by any Original Apostle of Jesus. Yes, there are references to the "Father" " The Son and Holy Ghost..but if you take all the scriptures,-and place them one after another,-they're totally explanable if you know how to explain first hand what is what by scripture.

But I can gully understand this; God not some Bible Collrge, or seminary School cannot understand it because God is the giver of his knowledge, not Man....Luke 24 v 45.
 
C

Consumed

Guest
please help me understand this topic that just circles the mountain -
if one believes in oneness doctrine he or she is saved or is not and visa versa . Honestly, the thought that salvation hinges on this one mystery of God yet to some it would seem is paramount to salvation. Wow i thought its all about Jesus and not setting up camps on either side of a valley and staring down into it.

Look to calavary where the entrance to life eternal was assured us by His blood.
Where there is unity is where God commands a blessing over, we are unified thru Christ Jesus ??arent we??

Lets be spiritually minded - mind of Christ, knowledge of Jesus, to love one another and not be as the pharasies were with the sadduces and the scribes and the lawyers for didnt they have their doctrinal differences too over the mosaic law

sorry, just being honest in my post to how i feel just as all of you are with whichever camp your in, id rather just sit at Jesus feet and adore Him for what He has done not for just me, but all of us...

:)
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
David
You as usual have done a great job of Perverting the scripture such as claiming ; I am a Spirit" sure you are David, and I am Humpty Dumpty and I was pushed.
You do not beleive that you are a spirit? The point is that the word spirit is a descriptive noun that can be applied to many thing. The fact that God is Spirit does not mean that the Father is the Holy Spirit.

You people just want to argue. And when you get cornered you pervert to get out.I am trying to explain to others about The oneness, you don't like it so whatever it takes you'll find a way to pervert things because your mind is closed, and you know everything already, and case closed. OK but did you ever think about others who may want to decide for themselves, with their own brain.?

You even perverted to the readers what air said regarding those I listed who know Oneness.cabs because your name was not mentioned you claim I Blacklisted you and others..Go re-read what I actually dId David, I simply said the list of names are those Who know the Oneness. your name simply was not mentioned because you beleive Trinity has nothing to do with Blacklisting you or anyone else. Get your facts straight before you spread your poison.
It was your post that I copied onto the first post. If the readers would like to, they can go back and see the original post. You put out a list saying, "These are the ones who have clear understanding and the trinitarians don't." This is exactly what you accuse others of and it was done before you started the new post.
You haven't responded to my post other than to say that I have perverted scripture and to make your Humpty-Dumpty comment. As for others making up their own mind, I am doing no more than you, presenting my point of view.
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
The entire Trinity beleif was never taught by any Original Apostle of Jesus. Yes, there are references to the "Father" " The Son and Holy Ghost..but if you take all the scriptures,-and place them one after another,-they're totally explanable if you know how to explain first hand what is what by scripture.

But I can gully understand this; God not some Bible Collrge, or seminary School cannot understand it because God is the giver of his knowledge, not Man....Luke 24 v 45.
You, just like every student of scripture, have an interpretive method and point of view. I disagree with your point of view. Keep in mind that the core theology of the New Testament was formulated by a graduate of the greatest Rabbi school of the time. In addition, every Jewish boy of Jesus' time, including Jesus, Peter, James, Jude, Matthew, Mark, and John went through theological training.
God formed us in the womb. He gifted us with natural talents with the intent of matching them with our experiences and our spiritual giftings. It is not our place to criticize another's calling nor the path that God set before them. "Every good gift is from the above." That includes the great gift that God allowed me to study under some of the godliest men in the world.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
I think he's reduced at this point to just circling the mountain and name calling. Let's hope the Lord rescues him from himself soon. God loves him so much. Does he love Oneness heresy more than whom the person of Jesus really is? Only time will tell. In the meantime, God is patient and kind.

It was your post that I copied onto the first post. If the readers would like to, they can go back and see the original post. You put out a list saying, "These are the ones who have clear understanding and the trinitarians don't." This is exactly what you accuse others of and it was done before you started the new post.
You haven't responded to my post other than to say that I have perverted scripture and to make your Humpty-Dumpty comment. As for others making up their own mind, I am doing no more than you, presenting my point of view.
 
C

Consumed

Guest
Question ::

does it have a bearing on ones salvation Yes or No???