Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
7,130
2,841
113
Some Good stuff brother.
What is disturbing about the "freewill" debate? The point, passion and objective of the "no" freewillers is denying the choice for or against HIS gospel.

The world/all can make any choice possible, but they cannot make a choice to be saved by the Lord Jesus Christ.

Their MISSION and PASSION is to deny Choice for or against His Gospel. All other "free" choices are Just fine, But One for Gospel is impossible. The MISSION of the calvies is to win the debate of "One cannot believe His Gospel!"......Let that sink in.
I like how you cut to the chase.

The MISSION of the calvies is to win the debate of "One cannot believe His Gospel!"......Let that sink in.

It is so preposterous, but we can have peace of mind knowing it ain't true.

God has not double blinded people for good measure because He lacks glory and what ever else they claim.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,890
420
83
So God's power is limited. He can only convince minds who are capable or want to be convinced? The difference, therefore, between the "haves" (accepted the gospel) and the "have nots" (gospel detractors) rest in the unregenerate people themselves. One group apparently has true, thinking, open minds while the others not so much? One group is smarter; the other not so much?

And what about the Holy Spirit? He plays no role in "convincing" people. Only the written word does that? One only needs to hear the Word and make a freewill decision, right?
Last first, I included the convincing work of the Spirit post ascension. You must have missed that.

You know God's power is not limited other than Him limiting Himself for His reasons. As I recall, I've seen you write about that. So, why try to make it look like I'm suggesting He's limited in His abilities other than self-limited as you've said as I recall.

From Rom1 we know that some reject knowing God and He allows it and at some point turns rejecters over to their "worthless minds" (worthless because they see no value in having Him in their knowledge). That's human will at work and God limiting His power to convince them at some point but using His sovereignty to judge them when He determines to do so. If anything else here, I think we see God has limited to His patience and knows full well what He's dealing with.

There's also His cooperating in hardening hearts that were/are being self-hardened.

From there I see human will remaining involved in becoming convinced and Scriptures like John5 and others explaining some of the reasons some do not will to come to Jesus, which would be in J5 the Jesus staring them in the face proclaiming precisely what God told Him to say and doing the works God gave Him to do. Again, and again, this speaks of human will rejecting God and preferring darkness, etc.

It's empty gamesmanship to suggest that we who see man's will involved differently than you do think we're smarter or better or anything such as this. We'd have to say that you were smarter or better also!:)

I do think there has to be and is a common characteristic in those who become convinced and at this time I think in part it is above in Rom1 in that we look around us and contemplate what we see and look inside of ourselves and contemplate what we believe - that we are insignificant in relation to this creation and the sense of righteousness and judgment inside of us came from somewhere outside of ourselves and we can't let any of this go beyond a point. So that's God Consciousness that we do not ultimately reject and thus don't end up with worthless minds. And with minds retaining some value by not having completely rejected Him, we retain some capacity to hear and learn from Him and come to His Son and believe in His Son whom He sent.

I also think Jesus in John4 is extremely important. I'm actually astounded at how little this section of Scripture is discussed. I said this many times but if we're not noticing how Jesus Christ Himself emphasized the instruction about whom God is seeking since Christ began His ministry for what would become the new era, then we're not versed in how Scripture creates emphasis. Jesus repeated one word 7 times in 4 verses. Try to find such emphasis by our Lord elsewhere. That should make any Bible student pay great attention. And this instruction is following His instruction on His giving living water - the Spirit. Take a look at your reference site and see what it says about this word, "proskuneO" (using @PaulThomson script to bring out the omega at the end). Let me know what your references say this word means. I'll assist from there as may be necessary or not if you don't want the assist.

Ask yourself why Jesus Christ our KING emphasized this instruction so heavily about who God was seeking as Jesus said, the time is coming and NOW IS...

As I said elsewhere, Faith - True Faith in God - is submission to Him. Apart from some decades of waywardness, the Rom1 knowledge of His existence and the recognition of standards in my conscience never completely left me. Over the years I read the Bible cover to cover a few times. At some point later, Jesus Christ made more sense than all men's nonsense and I better saw men for what we are.

I have zero concerns from relatively intensely being in and teaching His Word for decades that it is by His grace and His plan and His works that He convinced me to change my mind and will about Faith in His Son / submission to Him and Jesus Christ. I'm open to discussions about what constitutes Him convincing/persuading/drawing/dragging/compelling/coercing, etc. but as I said, there is a line here that should not be crossed. IMO your favored tradition crosses it and misinterprets many Scriptures.
 

fredoheaven

Senior Member
Nov 17, 2015
4,172
983
113
The Father DRAWS (literally DRAGS) people to Christ (Jn 6:44). He doesn't ship or send people to his Son via UPS, USPS, FedEx or Amazon Prime, etc. Do a definition and word usage study on Strong's 1670 (Gr. "helko")
Using Strong’s 1670 of the Gk. “helko” which is Thayer's definition could mean literally or figuratively, however, it is pointed out that in the case of John 6:44 is not to be interpreted literally but rather metaphorically considered as figurative language. See the definition No.2
2. metaphorically, to draw by inward power, lead, impel: John 6:44 (so in Greek also; as ἐπιθυμίας... ἑλκουσης ἐπὶ ἡδονάς, Plato, Phaedr., p. 238 a.; ὑπὸ τῆς ἡδονῆς ἑλκόμενοι, Aelian h. a. 6, 31; likewise 4 Macc. 14:13; 15:8 (4 Macc 15:11). trahit sua quemque voluptas, Vergil, ecl. 2, 65); πάντας ἑλκύσω πρὸς ἐμαυτόν, I by my moral, my spiritual, influence will win over to myself the hearts of all, John 12:32. Cf. Meyer on John 6:44; [Trench, § 21, Compare: ἐξέλκω.]
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,767
549
113
You have a habit of [intentionally] spelling surely wrong.
Only occasionally.

Thanks for the link. I know you use that site but the links provide some certainty we can see what you're seeing. A couple comments:
  • You said the word literally means to drag. This doesn't say that and it places no more literal emphasis on drag than draw.
  • Did you read the Thayer's Lexicon linked on that page?
  • Did you read the commentary at the Trench's Synonyms link on that page?
  • None of these support the drag view.
helkuo
NT:1670 helkuo (hel-koo'-o); or helko (hel'-ko); probably akin to NT:138; to drag (literally or figuratively):


KJV - draw. Compare NT:1667.
(New Exhaustive Strong's Numbers and Concordance with Expanded Greek-Hebrew Dictionary. Copyright © 1994, 2003



  • So, progressive revelation means Jesus is changing the basic context of the verse and section of Scripture He is drawing upon to base His instruction on? You really want to make this argument? If you'd have read the Trench's linked on your reference page you'd see the reference to Jer31:3 with a similar concept of drawing vs. dragging. I think Jesus is well versed in Scripture and the character of God, so, yes, I trust His leading the way I read His Word and how He and others drew from the Hebrew Scriptures.
No it does not mean that. It means that Jesus is applying an OT text to the NC Church, and he's applying it in the context of new revelation that teaches the church more about how God saves people.

The rest of your points I'll pass on after glancing briefly at them. Too much rabbit-trail diversions.

Did we resolve drawing and dragging or coming and believing or Jesus post crucifixion > ascension drawing all [men] or any other tradition-based beliefs you have? How about any Greek issues - did we get anywhere on those other than you ungraciously conceding that @PaulThomson and I were correct and you were wrong about pantas being translated as "all [men]"?
I don't recall conceding what you say about "pantas". I do recall saying that "all", in the context of chapter 12 in John, requires that we understand "all" as meaning "all without distinction". Now...if you insist on adding "men" as most Greek translators have, then that's fine too. What would change if we said, "all men without distinction"?

I think I pointed out this next little fact several days ago but if not, I'll post the text here. I said there was actually one translation that nailed Jn 12:32 perfectly. That was the Amplified!

John 12:32
32 And I, if and when I am lifted up from the earth [on the cross], will draw and attract all men [Gentiles as well as Jews] to Myself.

AMP

The translators certainly saw and understood the context of Jesus' remarks. They saw that Jews and Gentiles alike were already seeking Him out for reasons I stated previously. Therefore, they understood "all" or "all men" to be used in the limited sense, i.e. "all men [w/o distinction]". And really when it gets down to it, doesn't this make sense even here in the real world? Did God "draw" infants, babies or young children who died prematurely to him? Or what about the mentally incompetent: Is God drawing them? Or is God drawing the comatose to Jesus? If you're going to insist that Jn 12:32 should be understood in the distributive sense, i.e. "all men w/o exception", then there had better be NO EXCEPTIONS!

Oh yeah...before I forget: Are you aware than your favorite translation (NKJV) translates "helko" dragged four times in the NT?
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
3,767
549
113
Using Strong’s 1670 of the Gk. “helko” which is Thayer's definition could mean literally or figuratively, however, it is pointed out that in the case of John 6:44 is not to be interpreted literally but rather metaphorically considered as figurative language. See the definition No.2
2. metaphorically, to draw by inward power, lead, impel: John 6:44 (so in Greek also; as ἐπιθυμίας... ἑλκουσης ἐπὶ ἡδονάς, Plato, Phaedr., p. 238 a.; ὑπὸ τῆς ἡδονῆς ἑλκόμενοι, Aelian h. a. 6, 31; likewise 4 Macc. 14:13; 15:8 (4 Macc 15:11). trahit sua quemque voluptas, Vergil, ecl. 2, 65); πάντας ἑλκύσω πρὸς ἐμαυτόν, I by my moral, my spiritual, influence will win over to myself the hearts of all, John 12:32. Cf. Meyer on John 6:44; [Trench, § 21, Compare: ἐξέλκω.]
Yes, I'm well aware of what you wrote. But it is a strong term -- even when used metaphorically.
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
1,270
564
113
These threads are not really conducive to just grinding out all the thinking we could do on one point.
Go back then, and read their posts. The ONE point is " Unbelievers can't Choose His Gospel."

The mission and objective is to deter unbelievers of His Gospel.

Sinister for a few, ignorance for many.
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
1,270
564
113
Nah...Beth and John are just deader than door nails spiritually. Other than that tiny, spiritual health issue, they're fine.
Quite the message you have for the animals. Thank God we have many that know the Gospel for Beth and John.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,890
420
83
That's because you don't want to get it. Something -- Some Power is ultimately responsible in bringing dead people to faith and repentance. Since it's not God's grace that is effectual, then that effectual power must be within man. And what you just wrote above reveals your mindset. Only "thinking minds" can be saved. Whose thinking minds? Sinners', right? This is what makes the difference between two groups of sinners -- one group who accepts the gospel and the other that rejects it. It's the power of sinners' "thinking and open minds" that makes all the difference. That group of thinking sinners have much to boast of, don't they?
I missed this but said enough in answer to your other paragraph. so, just a few remarks:

I'm going to ask you not to tell me or state that I don't want to get something from the Text. You are extremely wrong and have no insights into my will and motives. If I cross that line with you or anyone here, please feel free to bring it to my attention and I'll consider it until it seems a tactic.

Not accepting efficacious grace as your tradition interprets it does not leave effectual power only in men. You've seen and discussed the power inherent in the Word of God - God's Good News concerning His Son Jesus Christ - the Faith once for all delivered to His Holy Ones, etc. We've also in the last few posts touched on the convincing ministry of His Spirit He sent post-session, and the proclaiming ministry of Christians sent by God to persuade unbelieving men has been mentioned. Apparently you think little to nothing of God's power in these things.

It seems a very simple and Scriptural step to go from being an unbeliever in God Consciousness retaining sufficient capacities to hear and learn and believe God's Word with it's inherent power, with His Spirit convincing men, with His sent messengers proclaiming the truth about His Son. All one has to do is see spiritual death differently than your tradition holds to and to reject the mind-numbing, illogical allegations that we who read Scripture differently somehow have or think we have some great power in us that others don't have.

You should be able to grasp that all I said in the paragraph above the previous two says where the power lies and that power is not where you allege we have to see it by your erroneous use of logic that a few of us have called you on quite a few times now. The above points are just a few in Scripture that teach us where Salvation comes from and whose Salvations it is that is gracious given to those who believe after hearing and learning what they're taught.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
62,606
31,455
113
I like how you cut to the chase.

The MISSION of the calvies is to win the debate of "One cannot believe His Gospel!"......Let that sink in.

It is so preposterous, but we can have peace of mind knowing it ain't true.

God has not double blinded people for good measure because He lacks glory and what ever else they claim.
We can always count on you to agree with whatever misrepresentation is circulating.
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
1,270
564
113
We can always count on you to agree with whatever misrepresentation is circulating.
You poor victim. You show me where you LIFT UP His gospel To unbelievers. You do nothing but deter and hinder His Gospel to unbelievers.

Prove me wrong. Point me to a post of yours that encourages and prompts an unbeliever to BELIEVE ON THE LORD JESUS CHRIST.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,890
420
83
helkuo
NT:1670 helkuo (hel-koo'-o); or helko (hel'-ko); probably akin to NT:138; to drag (literally or figuratively):



KJV - draw. Compare NT:1667.
(New Exhaustive Strong's Numbers and Concordance with Expanded Greek-Hebrew Dictionary. Copyright © 1994, 2003
Point out your errors enough times and you'll finally get closer. You do notice it says "literally or figuratively", correct? How about "probably akin to NT:138" which means to drag (literally or figuratively)?

No it does not mean that. It means that Jesus is applying an OT text to the NC Church, and he's applying it in the context of new revelation that teaches the church more about how God saves people.
You sure Jesus is not talking to OT Jews and telling them that just as Isaiah says, God is drawing back His bride to Himself with kindness and covenant loyalty?" Who's Jesus talking to in J5-6? We've just been working on picking up principles that may apply to us.

I don't recall conceding what you say about "pantas". I do recall saying that "all", in the context of chapter 12 in John, requires that we understand "all" as meaning "all without distinction". Now...if you insist on adding "men" as most Greek translators have, then that's fine too. What would change if we said, "all men without distinction"?

I think I pointed out this next little fact several days ago but if not, I'll post the text here. I said there was actually one translation that nailed Jn 12:32 perfectly. That was the Amplified!

John 12:32
32 And I, if and when I am lifted up from the earth [on the cross], will draw and attract all men [Gentiles as well as Jews] to Myself.

AMP

The translators certainly saw and understood the context of Jesus' remarks. They saw that Jews and Gentiles alike were already seeking Him out for reasons I stated previously. Therefore, they understood "all" or "all men" to be used in the limited sense, i.e. "all men [w/o distinction]". And really when it gets down to it, doesn't this make sense even here in the real world? Did God "draw" infants, babies or young children who died prematurely to him? Or what about the mentally incompetent: Is God drawing them? Or is God drawing the comatose to Jesus? If you're going to insist that Jn 12:32 should be understood in the distributive sense, i.e. "all men w/o exception", then there had better be NO EXCEPTIONS!
I'm just glossing over this, so: yes you did concede [ungraciously] that "all [men]" is an accurate translation and afterward worked to explain it as you interpret it. I answered your interpretation. I think "all men" is correct and I explained why. Adding "without distinction" is fine but if we are going to amplify it I'd also say "without exception".

I don't think you did post the Amplified but even it is open to interpretation reading into it what we want it to say. i.e. It could be saying "all men (without exception) [Gentiles as well as Jews] (without distinction). All Jews and Gentiles as you previously noted can just mean all mankind irrespective of race.

I do notice how it amplifies draw by adding "and attract" which it looks like is making sure "drag" is not in view. "Attract" is how some interpreters explain Greek helko and the equivalent Hebrew word in Is54 and Jer that I posted.

Oh yeah...before I forget: Are you aware than your favorite translation (NKJV) translates "helko" dragged four times in the NT?
I don't know if you read my post to Paul, but I only use the NKJ because I used in seminary for 3 years and became very used to doing digital searches in it. It's also fairly literal in comparison to others. Before that I mainly used the NAS. Since I learned Greek I mainly use Greek but will also see what translators are doing in several translations. When I get into deeper mode I translate myself.

Yes, I have looked at all uses of helko in the NT and LXX and how it's translated in a few English versions. I try to be pretty comprehensive when looking at things for these discussions.
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
1,270
564
113
We can always count on you to agree with whatever misrepresentation is circulating.
In Fact......Show me ONE post where you and your Ilk encourage or prompt an unbeliever to Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ for their salvation .

You and your cohorts are here to drive away seekers. Not to bring them into the fold.

Sick. Sad and completely WRONG.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,890
420
83
Go back then, and read their posts. The ONE point is " Unbelievers can't Choose His Gospel."

The mission and objective is to deter unbelievers of His Gospel.

Sinister for a few, ignorance for many.
I get your point, but it's hard enough to keep moving forward in any meaningful way. Going back is too much.
 

fredoheaven

Senior Member
Nov 17, 2015
4,172
983
113
Yes, I'm well aware of what you wrote. But it is a strong term -- even when used metaphorically.
Yes, I posted the fact and you may have purposely done it to prove your point but perhaps in a biased way. The word “draw” has different nuances and it may mean a simple ‘traction’ that you are trying to point to and that God is active and men are passive. However, the word “draw” has yet another meaning an ‘attraction’. Figuratively used, this means to cause to enter, to lead (to, into, or from a course or condition.)
So what the Bible saying here based on the context of God’s drawing of men is that leading people to Christ is with the condition of coming to Him (John 6:35-37) and this coming to Christ by believing Him (John 6:39; John 6:47)
I have no issue with God as a drawer (The Father, Christ, and the Holy Spirit) for He is active but he could not force any man. Man is also active whether he receives or rejects the bread of life “…if any man eat of this bread, he shall live forever…” Thus the condition implies men are not passive, it is active too.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
1,890
420
83
Yes, I'm well aware of what you wrote. But it is a strong term -- even when used metaphorically.
Such a strong word that the Amplified you thought nailed the verse uses "attract" to make sure we see "draw" in one of the legitimate ways to read it. Either is seemingly distant from drag/force.
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
1,270
564
113
I get your point, but it's hard enough to keep moving forward in any meaningful way. Going back is too much.
I know. It doesn't matter to them. They (most of them)want the "intellectual" debate. And are great at it.

But the POINT in it all.........."You can't choose Christ." That is the premise. That is the point.

When I say "Let that sink in".........Let that sink in! It is sinister.
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
1,270
564
113
I get your point, but it's hard enough to keep moving forward in any meaningful way. Going back is too much.
On the other hand.....You have done some serious studies and that is MUCH appreciated! So it's kinda a catch 22 for me?!
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
62,606
31,455
113
God’s elect is Jesus Christ. Election is to service, never salvation.

2 Thessalonians 2:10b-14a ~ Those who are perishing refused the love of the truth that would have saved them. For this reason God will send them a powerful delusion so that they believe the lie, in order that judgment may come upon all who have disbelieved the truth and delighted in wickedness. But we always thank God for you, brothers who are loved by the Lord, because God has chosen you from the beginning to be saved by the sanctification of the Spirit and by faith in the truth, to which He called you through our gospel.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
17,469
3,758
113

2 Thessalonians 2:10b-14a ~ Those who are perishing refused the love of the truth that would have saved them. For this reason God will send them a powerful delusion so that they believe the lie, in order that judgment may come upon all who have disbelieved the truth and delighted in wickedness. But we always thank God for you, brothers who are loved by the Lord, because God has chosen you from the beginning to be saved by the sanctification of the Spirit and by faith in the truth, to which He called you through our gospel.
Yep, Paul revealing the way God would choose to save the Gentiles from the beginning. That way would be through faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ.