When does the rapture occur?
- Thread starter Elin
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Interesting way to look at this passage. Okay, if that's the correct way (and I'm always open to different ideas) what does come next???
The end of Masada doesn't fit. The destruction of the Temple in AD 70 also doesn't fit because once the temple was destroyed (which ended the sacrifices) there was no temple to set anything up in
.
The end of Masada doesn't fit. The destruction of the Temple in AD 70 also doesn't fit because once the temple was destroyed (which ended the sacrifices) there was no temple to set anything up in
.
example: How long do you think you need to set up things?
there more than 1290 days after AD70
Daniel 11:31 - during Antiochus
Daniel 12 - during the Roman siege
Revelation 13, still future...
Watcher,
Why would Jesus be referring back in time 200 years in Mat 24:15??? Does this really makes sense to you? Do you often warn people of something and tell them to take action if the event was in the past?
I'm not sure how familiar you are with American History but it would be like me warning people that the British were coming (like Paul Revere did) today but I was talking about an event from 1775.
Why would Jesus be referring back in time 200 years in Mat 24:15??? Does this really makes sense to you? Do you often warn people of something and tell them to take action if the event was in the past?
I'm not sure how familiar you are with American History but it would be like me warning people that the British were coming (like Paul Revere did) today but I was talking about an event from 1775.
Did Michael Stand up in AD 70?
Who was delivered in AD 70??
Was there a resurrection in AD 70?
Did the wise shine like the brightness of the firmament in AD 70?
Did those who turned people to righteousness shine like stars forever and ever in AD 70?
Did people run to and fro and did knowledge increase in AD 70?
Was the time of the end AD 70?
Who was delivered in AD 70??
Was there a resurrection in AD 70?
Did the wise shine like the brightness of the firmament in AD 70?
Did those who turned people to righteousness shine like stars forever and ever in AD 70?
Did people run to and fro and did knowledge increase in AD 70?
Was the time of the end AD 70?
Watcher,
According to you, Jesus was warning of events of AD 67-73 in the below passage.
15 "Therefore when you see the 'abomination of desolation,' spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place" ... 16 then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains... 21 For then there will be great tribulation.
You claim the AofD was in 167 BC. So why would Jesus command those in Judea to flee an event that was 200 years old???
You claim the Great Tribulation was the Roman Seize and subsequent scattering and killing of the Jews from AD 67-73. That makes sense if there was no AofD mentioned. We already established that there was no AofD spoken of by Daniel in AD 70. There was only a burning of the temple. Nothing was set up there - because it was burned.
Jesus could not have invoked Dan 11:31 if it was in the past to Him, correct??? So which passage in Daniel was Jesus invoking??? 9:27??
According to you, Jesus was warning of events of AD 67-73 in the below passage.
15 "Therefore when you see the 'abomination of desolation,' spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place" ... 16 then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains... 21 For then there will be great tribulation.
You claim the AofD was in 167 BC. So why would Jesus command those in Judea to flee an event that was 200 years old???
You claim the Great Tribulation was the Roman Seize and subsequent scattering and killing of the Jews from AD 67-73. That makes sense if there was no AofD mentioned. We already established that there was no AofD spoken of by Daniel in AD 70. There was only a burning of the temple. Nothing was set up there - because it was burned.
Jesus could not have invoked Dan 11:31 if it was in the past to Him, correct??? So which passage in Daniel was Jesus invoking??? 9:27??
Can you see Michael? The fact that some of the Jews were delivered.
The Jews who were not killed...
the time of trouble is not the same time as the resurrection
You are mixing prophecies
There was no mobile phone during Daniel...ever since then, knowledge grow exponentially
It was part of the last days, as peter quoted Joel during Pentecost. saying it was the last days.
The Jews who were not killed...
the time of trouble is not the same time as the resurrection
You are mixing prophecies
There was no mobile phone during Daniel...ever since then, knowledge grow exponentially
It was part of the last days, as peter quoted Joel during Pentecost. saying it was the last days.
The first question in Mat 24 pertained to the temple. It was also the first thing Jesus answered. Correct?? He tells about the temple in verse 2.
Ok, the temple was destroyed in AD 70. No dispute on that.
Now why would Jesus go back in time in verse 15 to the year 167 BC and mention the A of D and warn people to flee???????? You aren't answering this.
Ok, the temple was destroyed in AD 70. No dispute on that.
Now why would Jesus go back in time in verse 15 to the year 167 BC and mention the A of D and warn people to flee???????? You aren't answering this.
I don't like the term, "AntiChrist." I only use it because so many people only know him by this term. He is better described as the AntiGod.
Paul calls him, "the Man of Sin," "the Son of Perdition"
Daniel calls him, "the King of the North"
John calls him, "the Beast coming up out of the Earth"
Whatever you want to call him, he hasn't come yet. He is in the future.
Paul calls him, "the Man of Sin," "the Son of Perdition"
Daniel calls him, "the King of the North"
John calls him, "the Beast coming up out of the Earth"
Whatever you want to call him, he hasn't come yet. He is in the future.