Women Pastors? Help me.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
See page two, post #35 <~ link

I am sure others have made the same or similar observations.

Saying it is not there (as one or some have) is a lie.
There is no word "Priscilla" in your post #35 :) So yes, it is not there.

Its about Phoebe in Romans 16:1. Paul called her "servant" or, in Greek "diakonon". What do you think he meant by this word?
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,431
0
The way some people approach the Scriptures really is scary. Someone once wrote this.....

“The bible says it, I believe it, and that settles it.”

"What a strange saying! Whenever I hear it I think: “Well, that’s a nice idea. But if it’s really that simple, why can’t Christians ever seem to agree on what it says?” If you can just pick up the bible and understand it without any prior knowledge, context, or study—that is, if the bible is such an easy book (as this phrase seems to imply!), then why are there over 30,000 Christian denominations worldwide? Why can’t we agree on the bible if it’s so easy to just read it, believe it, and have our minds settled about what it says?"

"Though it has become a sort of catchphrase for evangelical Christianity, this is a horrible method for understanding the bible. Fundamentally, it errs in breaking what I believe to be the very first and most important rule of biblical exegesis (or explanation): taking context seriously. It’s a dishonor to the scriptures themselves to take them at their face value. As theologian Karl Barth once said, “I take the bible too seriously to read it literally.” "

"You absolutely cannot read the bible 2,000 years divorced from the original culture, language, and tradition it was written into and pretend to understand it the way it was meant to be understood!"

"What is really being said with this is, “I think this is what the bible says, I believe I’m right, and so I don’t have to listen to your dumb ideas!” "

"The bible is a difficult book. You can’t understand it by itself. Instead, it’s important to take the time and humbly come before the scriptures with respect, studying carefully what they mean. We far too often read the bible with a preconceived idea of what it’s about. However, if we are to be faithful to the bible we must come humbly before it without any such preconceptions."

"In marketing, they often say that “content it king”. But in biblical studies one might likewise say, “context is king”. Taking the bible seriously means taking the time to study the language, history, and current events that surrounded its original publication. Context is crucial to understanding the original intent of the biblical authors, and what we can learn from them today. Who is this passage written to? What purpose did the author have in mind? What sort of language is being used? These are crucial questions we must address every time we approach the bible if we are to be faithful to its witness."
Well said Willie....

Sometimes what people mean when they say “The bible says it, I believe it, and that settles it.”. This sounds legitimate on the surface of things.

But they can really mean is - "I believe the way I interpret the scripture or how I was taught in my church upbringing to believe about that verse or topic".

Hold a knife to the throat of one of our "sacred cows" from our church teachings - and our religious zeal becomes activated and it isn't a pretty sight.

Just ask Martin Luther when he said "The just shall live by faith". The current religious world and beliefs for 1,100 years attacked him for his "heresy".
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,786
2,957
113
I never mean to offend. I am in total agreement that women are equal to men. That's not the question. The question is how God has given roles within the church. Women have, are, and will do great things for the cause of Christ within the church. I take the Bible literally and never allow culture to dictate what is stated in the Bible, nor am I going to change words or play the Greek game to make the Bible fit my theology. I believe the Bible states quite clearly that the role of a pastor should be a man. Most people responding take that and run thinking this means women are degraded in some way. I can't change their false assumptions.
Using the "uninspired" KJV I see.:)

John! If you truly believe women are equal to men, then you would be ok with women pastors! What you have said is logically impossible. Either men are over women, in your belief that only men can be pastors, or women and men are equal and therefore, women can be pastors!

Again and again, I show you the Greek, and you fall back on the uninspired KJV and say that is the Bible, when it has been so badly translated. And not just in this area! I could show you hundreds of mistakes in literally every chapter. My Greek prof won't even deal for a minute with the KJV or any of the nonsense about the TR. Which in this case, supports the neuter nature of being deacons, too! An agenda resulted in the KJV put all those "men" and "his" and "he's" in that passage in 1 Tim. 3, that appears no where, in ANY GREEK text.

Greek is the true NT. That is where we need to go, in the end, to discover the truth about what the original writers wrote, in spite of a misogynist culture. Paul wrote what Jesus told him to write, and the truth, in Greek, is that women and men could both be leaders and elders and pastors.

Not trying to put you down, but I have never used the KJV, inspired or uninspired. I don't speak early modern English, and it is much to alien for me to understand. I understand Greek, Hebrew, French and Spanish better than the language of the KJV. Even in exegeting 1 Tim. 3, I had to keep referring to the modern versions to try and get a sense of what your beloved KJV was saying.

Does that make me stupid? No, it makes me a scholar. I am not equipped to deal with that language. I do not understand the grammar, the verb forms in second person singular, which modern English does not have, nor the some of the vocabulary. (Not saying that is a good thing, as Greek does have the second person singular, and sometimes things are lost in the modern versions.) We had a woman from the deep south, with the most lovely drawl, and she said "ya'll" for second person plural and "you" for second person singular, which really worked, But not my language!
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
Well said Willie....

Sometimes what people mean when they say “The bible says it, I believe it, and that settles it.”. This sounds legitimate on the surface of things.

But they can really mean is - "I believe the way I interpret the scripture or how I was taught in my church upbringing to believe about that verse or topic".

Hold a knife to the throat of one of our "sacred cows" from our church teachings - and our religious zeal becomes activated and it isn't a pretty sight.

Just ask Martin Luther when he said "The just shall live by faith". The current religious world and beliefs for 1,100 years attacked him for his "heresy".
Thank you. But, as I said, someone else wrote that. I just can't remember who.

But, we do have our sacred cows. I have often remarked at how odd it is that Jesus often looked skyward when He prayed, yet we have accepted as "Holy" and required that when we pray, it has to be, "Every head bowed, and every eye closed."
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,786
2,957
113
Well said Willie....

Sometimes what people mean when they say “The bible says it, I believe it, and that settles it.”. This sounds legitimate on the surface of things.

But they can really mean is - "I believe the way I interpret the scripture or how I was taught in my church upbringing to believe about that verse or topic".

Hold a knife to the throat of one of our "sacred cows" from our church teachings - and our religious zeal becomes activated and it isn't a pretty sight.

Just ask Martin Luther when he said "The just shall live by faith". The current religious world and beliefs for 1,100 years attacked him for his "heresy".

I agree with some of what you have said.

However, Martin Luther tacked his 95 Theses against indulgences on the church at Wittenburg (a legend, or just an extension of his fight and his publishing this Theses?) in 1517. That makes it 500 years ago, not 1,100 years ago. Since this anniversary is going to be celebrated by Lutherans next year, an important mark in church history.

Plus, the Catholic church and the Lutheran Church in many areas, are reconciling. One of my mentors in chaplaincy had a father who was the head of the Missouri-Synod in India, and a mother who was the head of the Evangelical Lutherans in India, and they brokered a covenant with the RCC for reconcilation. Ironically, the Missouri-Synod is against women being pastors. This man said he would never ordain any woman - except his daughters. He came all the way from India twice to ordain his daughters at different times. Of course, they were Evangelical Lutheran!

History, people! It is so easy to google something before you post it!
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
17,109
3,685
113
John! If you truly believe women are equal to men, then you would be ok with women pastors! What you have said is logically impossible. Either men are over women, in your belief that only men can be pastors, or women and men are equal and therefore, women can be pastors!

Again and again, I show you the Greek, and you fall back on the uninspired KJV and say that is the Bible, when it has been so badly translated. And not just in this area! I could show you hundreds of mistakes in literally every chapter. My Greek prof won't even deal for a minute with the KJV or any of the nonsense about the TR. Which in this case, supports the neuter nature of being deacons, too! An agenda resulted in the KJV put all those "men" and "his" and "he's" in that passage in 1 Tim. 3, that appears no where, in ANY GREEK text.

Greek is the true NT. That is where we need to go, in the end, to discover the truth about what the original writers wrote, in spite of a misogynist culture. Paul wrote what Jesus told him to write, and the truth, in Greek, is that women and men could both be leaders and elders and pastors.

Not trying to put you down, but I have never used the KJV, inspired or uninspired. I don't speak early modern English, and it is much to alien for me to understand. I understand Greek, Hebrew, French and Spanish better than the language of the KJV. Even in exegeting 1 Tim. 3, I had to keep referring to the modern versions to try and get a sense of what your beloved KJV was saying.

Does that make me stupid? No, it makes me a scholar. I am not equipped to deal with that language. I do not understand the grammar, the verb forms in second person singular, which modern English does not have, nor the some of the vocabulary. (Not saying that is a good thing, as Greek does have the second person singular, and sometimes things are lost in the modern versions.) We had a woman from the deep south, with the most lovely drawl, and she said "ya'll" for second person plural and "you" for second person singular, which really worked, But not my language!
Equality does not mean we are allowed to share the same role. Men and women are equal, but who has God placed in charge over the household of a family? Why? Because it is meant to show how Christ is head over the bride, the church. Equal, yet having order. I have not been called by God to be a pastor. I am to submit to the pastor of the church I attend. We are equal but have different roles within the church body.

You have an issue with KJV that did not come natural. You had to be "educated" into that position. Your false claims about King James the man is not called for. Being a "scholar", you have not done your study on him but rather read what others have falsely claimed. Why? Because these people don't like that there are people out there that actually believe they have the Bible, God's word. They do not want to submit authority, rather trust in their scholarship.
 
Last edited:

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
What if I'm a pastor and I AM a man...
but I "identify" as a girl...
and I'm not a pretty girl...
just a really hairy, muscular, manly girl..
and I also identify as a 6 year old girl,
who probably shouldn't have a drivers license,
so I have trouble getting to my church to preach on sunday...
and I'm actually "gender fluid",
so sometimes I DO identify as a man,
but just not on Sundays when I'm preaching?

What then?
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
What if I'm a pastor and I AM a man...
but I "identify" as a girl...
and I'm not a pretty girl...
just a really hairy, muscular, manly girl..
and I also identify as a 6 year old girl,
who probably shouldn't have a drivers license,
so I have trouble getting to my church to preach on sunday...
and I'm actually "gender fluid",
so sometimes I DO identify as a man,
but just not on Sundays when I'm preaching?

What then?
Then you should stop using narcotics:)
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
Then you should stop using narcotics:)
Unfortunately this is all real...
there are people like this.

They just aren't going to seminary and getting ordained yet.

But they will.

It's all coming.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Unfortunately this is all real...
there are people like this.

They just aren't going to seminary and getting ordained yet.

But they will.

It's all coming.
Please, do not export this invention to the rest of the world :)
 
D

Depleted

Guest
As soon as someone says Lydia, I always think, purple :D


Purple is my favorite color too. Originally, my garden was supposed to be nothing but purple. (It was, until, I learned hummingbirds prefer red, and yellow looks great as a contrast to purple.)

The other thing I liked about Lydia was purple cloth was strictly for the upper crust. (The dye used was exotic.) So she was the brains behind "high-end retail." :D
 

proverbs35

Senior Member
Nov 10, 2012
827
239
43
Women Pastors in China

I rarely weigh in on discussions like this simply because people are going to believe whatever they are going to believe. Some are going to lean toward a LITERAL biblical interpretation, and others are going to consider supply & demand. (There's a demand/need for laborers, especially male laborers, to go out to the field, but the supply of laborers, especially male ones, is few).

However, when I read threads on women pastors, I noticed that the discussion is usually limited to
1.) what Paul said
2.) Western culture. I'm not here to try to change anyone's mind on this debate. I would simply like to add some other considerations to the discussion that so often get left out.

In the population of China, males outnumber females considerably mainly because of China's one child policy. However, in the Chinese church, there are more female believers than male believers. There are also more female students than male students in the seminaries, more female preachers than male preachers, and even more female senior pastors than male senior pastors.

When we inquire into the possible reasons for this imbalance, several factors come to mind:

Through the China Inland Mission, and then with other mission agencies, WOMEN played a major role in the spread of the Gospel in China in the 19th and 20th centuries. To begin with, they were sent to minister to women, who could not be reached by men because of social customs.
Later, however, many foreign women missionaries also ministered to mixed groups, though they still usually worked mostly among women.

Their example paved the way for the prominent role of Chinese women as evangelists and Bible teachers. Another consequence of their activity was the rapid spread of the Gospel among Chinese women.

The activity of Chinese female evangelists. Not only before 1949, but especially afterwards, Chinese WOMEN have played a major role in the growth of the church. When pastors, elders, evangelists, and deacons were put into prison or even killed under the rule of the Communists, WOMEN stepped into positions of leadership.

Some women held meetings in their homes. Others were sent out by house to do itinerant evangelism. Usually going two-by-two, they took the Gospel to countless towns and villages across the nation. Their fearless and passionate preaching led to the conversions of millions of people, most of whom were women. Female pastors and evangelists have built a church composed largely of women.

Source:
Global China Center | Analysis

"Female pastors and evangelists have built a church composed largely of women." That's not a surprise because studies show that Christian women worldwide are the most religious and the most persecuted.

Christian Women Worldwide Are The Most Religious … and the Most Persecuted | Gleanings | ChristianityToday.com

Fact: God is using female pastors in China to build his church and fulfill the Great Commission. The proof is in the pudding. Chinese women are doing the work that men are either unwilling or unable to do.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,907
29,288
113
What if I'm a pastor and I AM a man...
but I "identify" as a girl...
and I'm not a pretty girl...
just a really hairy, muscular, manly girl..
and I also identify as a 6 year old girl,
who probably shouldn't have a drivers license,
so I have trouble getting to my church to preach on sunday...
and I'm actually "gender fluid",
so sometimes I DO identify as a man,
but just not on Sundays when I'm preaching?

What then?
Wasn't there a thread about this? Something about a demon shapeshifter...
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
Equality does not mean we are allowed to share the same role. Men and women are equal, but who has God placed in charge over the household of a family? Why? Because it is meant to show how Christ is head over the bride, the church. Equal, yet having order. I have not been called by God to be a pastor. I am to submit to the pastor of the church I attend. We are equal but have different roles within the church body.

You have an issue with KJV that did not come natural. You had to be "educated" into that position. Your false claims about King James the man is not called for. Being a "scholar", you have not done your study on him but rather read what others have falsely claimed. Why? Because these people don't like that there are people out there that actually believe they have the Bible, God's word. They do not want to submit authority, rather trust in their scholarship.
That is as ridiculous as saying we were "educated into" an issue with using faulty English grammar in our writing and speaking.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
But, "WE" haven't heard Obama or Hillary saying a word on this, or any other, Christian forum.
I used to think America, including Christians, had a majority on "smart." Last May I had to deal with I was wrong about that.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
59,907
29,288
113
There is no word "Priscilla" in your post #35 :) So yes, it is not there.

Its about Phoebe in Romans 16:1. Paul called her "servant" or, in Greek "diakonon". What do you think he meant by this word?
My apologies, I meant Phoebe, who was called a deacon, which is the meaning of the word Diakonon.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
Luke 2:36-38 (NIV)36
There was also a prophet, Anna, the daughter of Penuel, of the tribe of Asher. She was very old; she had lived with her husband seven years after her marriage, 37 and then was a widow until she was eighty-four. She never left the temple but worshiped night and day, fasting and praying.38 Coming up to them
(Mary, Joseph, and baby Jesus) at that very moment, she gave thanks to God and spoke about the child (Jesus) to all who were looking forward to the redemption of Jerusalem.
Thank you! I was thinking "Anne," but then thought that was John the Baptist's Mom. But yeah, that's the lady I was thinking of.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
I agree with some of what you have said.

However, Martin Luther tacked his 95 Theses against indulgences on the church at Wittenburg (a legend, or just an extension of his fight and his publishing this Theses?) in 1517. That makes it 500 years ago, not 1,100 years ago. Since this anniversary is going to be celebrated by Lutherans next year, an important mark in church history.

Plus, the Catholic church and the Lutheran Church in many areas, are reconciling. One of my mentors in chaplaincy had a father who was the head of the Missouri-Synod in India, and a mother who was the head of the Evangelical Lutherans in India, and they brokered a covenant with the RCC for reconcilation. Ironically, the Missouri-Synod is against women being pastors. This man said he would never ordain any woman - except his daughters. He came all the way from India twice to ordain his daughters at different times. Of course, they were Evangelical Lutheran!

History, people! It is so easy to google something before you post it!
Uh.... Did he say it was 1,100 years ago? I thought he meant that at the time Luther did that (500 years ago?) 1,100 years of previous church history went against him.

Maybe I read it wrong?