AmberGardner, I'll continue to repeat until you comprehend that the information she's telling you is wrong or I tire of your refusal to accept the truth, whichever comes first.
Perhaps English isn't your first language and that's why you cannot comprehend what I'm communicating to you. Maybe that's the problem. If you can understand what I'm writing, I want you to know that I earned an M.Div. with an A average and am qualified to discuss this with you.
Now rewatch the video (reposted below) and write down what she says. Here, I'll get you started. She states:
"And today we are going to look at what scripture has to say about our
heavenly mother. Now most of us think that the Holy Spirit came upon Mary and she got pregnant but what it says OK is that the Holy Spirit will come upon you and the power of the most high will overshadow you. So again,
we have the Holy Spirit which is the female part of God and the most high which is God the father and we see that they've come together and as a result of that a child is born and he is called the son of God."
She then goes on to say:
"Now that the Word of the Lord has come to you at this point, now that you know,
the two spirits came together to make Jesus Christ..."
Etc... etc... etc...
Watch the whole video all the way through. This feminist is ALL screwed up and it's for exactly the reasons I've already specified in my previous posts in this thread which you can view here:
1. Post one:
http://christianchat.com/christian-family-forum/79897-dangers-feminism-17.html#post1437543
2. Post two:
http://christianchat.com/christian-family-forum/79897-dangers-feminism-17.html#post1437850
3. Post three:
http://christianchat.com/christian-family-forum/79897-dangers-feminism-18.html#post1438217
What we find in Matthew and Luke is Mary conceiving without any form of intercourse through the agency of the Holy Spirit's power as when the Spirit of God hovered over the waters in Genesis creating life.
Specifically the verse is clear that the power, δυναμις (e.g. the miracle-working power) overshadows and biologically conceives a spiritually pre-existent Son (e.g. See Doctrine of the Trinity) without sex. That Christ is the eternal Son of God is clear from both Old and New Testaments (e.g. See Christology).
As Clarke's Bible commentary states:
"There is a plain allusion to the Spirit of God brooding over the face of the waters, to render them prolific, Genesis 1:2. The rudiments of the human nature of Christ was a real creation in the womb of the virgin, by the energy of the Spirit of God.
We may plainly perceive here, that the angel does not give the appellation of Son of God to the Divine nature of Christ; but to that holy person or thing, το ἁγιον, which was to be born of the virgin by the energy of the Holy Spirit."
The Geneva Study Bible put it like this:
"Now the birth of Jesus Christ was thus: His mother, Mary, that is, having been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together, she was found to be with child of
the Holy Spirit [singular]."
God doesn't have sex with Himself nor need to have sex with Himself to create a fetus and then insert a pre-existent person of the Godhead, to create Adam, or Eve, or to create biological life of any kind.
She's teaching information that isn't true that does not align with what scripture actually says and, in fact, contradicts it. That is the problem.
[video=youtube_share;3LQ1mqOCZ54]http://youtu.be/3LQ1mqOCZ54[/video]