Ahh... the live and let live attitude...as the world fades away...
Okay, you make some great points. I don't remember saying I was a victim of these women; simply that the manner of dress is getting out of hand. Also, if it wasn't thrown in my face every second of the day, I would have a softer stance.
I practice a great deal of self control sir. I never said they were causing me to sin. In fact, all it does is cause more contempt for them. Also, I am well aware the BURDEN is on me, that's why I deal with it with great help from the Holy Spirit. Should I then rejoice in the fact that I have to fight this battle? Doubtful.
While you are correct - 85% of them are not Christian (I attend a Christian church, so don't even try it on the remaining 15%) -
you make it seem it's my responsibility to ignore what's going on and just practice self control. Not the case sir. I have young boys that don't need this non-sense.
My candle's light will not be hidden...
A
In response to the bolded portion i will quote my own post
And concerning the Christian woman, if her manner of dress is too tight, too revealing, etc... she does hold a Level of responsibility
Your words since the first post have been from an extreme point of view 'muslims do it right by making women cover up so the men don't have to be tempted'. That is, undeniably, what you are stating.
Now, when i present scripture, that you did not even acknowledge, and personal responsibility, you try to apply extremist views on me. Just because you are taking an extreme stance does not give you the right to twist my words into extremes so you can find a leg to stand on.
I clearly stated Christian women do bear some responsibility.
I said that non-Christian women can't be expected to be held to the same standard.
I also, using scripture, stated that if it's Your temptation then You take responsibility, not blame women and expect them to take extreme measures so you don't have to exercise self control.
Your young boys are going to grow up to be men that live in this environment, so they are going to have to learn to practice self control as well.
Now lets go over some of your own words.
"I don't remember saying I was a victim of these women"
"Also, if it wasn't thrown in my face every second of the day, I would have a softer stance."
One minute you're claiming that you are not saying you are not a victim, the next you say it's thrown in your face and causing you to take a harder stance. 'Having it thrown in my face, so i get upset because they are doing this to me' is a victim stance.
Also i made no such claim as 'live and let live'. What i said was 'take responsibility because worldly people cannot be held to Christs standards'. Big difference.
You can argue semantics, put your extreme take on things on other people falsely, etc... but you clearly stated from the beginning that women should be covered head to toe so you wouldn't have to deal with temptation. That is your first post. And that is, using scripture, not a biblical way of thinking. Yet scripture is the one thing you continue responding to, but rather twist the words of those who disagree with you.
First you rejected it because it came from a woman, and that she didn't understand. But when it came from a man you still rejected the scriptures and a refusal to accept your attempt to place blame elsewhere.