Anti-Trump rally protests around the world.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Smoke

Senior Member
Oct 27, 2016
1,644
596
113
Maybe you should change your name from "smoke" to "twist." Even though I never breathed a word about adults being ridiculed in that post, there is a WORLD of difference. I am insulted constantly, and I also lay it on heavy, but we are adults.... NOT developing children who can be utterly warped for years, maybe even, life by adults mocking them.

Touchy Snowflake adults are not the same as sensitive children, at all..
They are the same in that they are both wrong. Do you disagree?

In terms of how wrong something is, I made no mention of one being greater or lesser. I just see both as unnecessary.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
They are the same in that they are both wrong. Do you disagree?

In terms of how wrong something is, I made no mention of one being greater or lesser. I just see both as unnecessary.
Yes, of course you are right... doing either is wrong, but comparing apples to oranges is closer.
 

Smoke

Senior Member
Oct 27, 2016
1,644
596
113
Yes, of course you are right... doing either is wrong, but comparing apples to oranges is closer.
I'm not sure it's comparing apples to oranges as it is comparing a honeycrisp and a red delicious (both apples). Children are still human beings (apples) just as adults are. I'm not saying it's better or worse to insult a child versus an adult... that isn't my point whatsoever. It deflects from my point that both are wrong and if one screams foul on one they can't be hypocritical and say it's okay to do it to the other.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
Seriously. Children often internalize ridicule, and take it as something being wrong with them. Adults usually just get mad and attack back.
 

Smoke

Senior Member
Oct 27, 2016
1,644
596
113
Seriously. Children often internalize ridicule, and take it as something being wrong with them. Adults usually just get mad and attack back.
What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? I'm not here to discuss why one is worse than the other or if it even is. We both agreed they are both wrong. I give you credit for doing it first. It's refreshing to see here.
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
113
0
What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? I'm not here to discuss why one is worse than the other or if it even is. We both agreed they are both wrong. I give you credit for doing it first. It's refreshing to see here.
Youre the one that made the comparison man. And calling a group of people and what they stand for ugly is a far cry from calling a ten year old boy who happens to be the presidents son and did absolutely nothing wrong a rapist or whatever and was beyond the pale. And stop attributing what someone else said to me. I know ugly when I see it and sometimes it has nothing to do with physical attributes.
 
Last edited:

Agricola

Senior Member
Dec 10, 2012
2,638
88
48
Anti-Trump woman asked to leave plane. Makes comment that Trump is bad because he does not back climate change and the trump s upporter is violating her space.

[video=youtube;n8HGTmANHyU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8HGTmANHyU[/video]
 
Last edited:

Agricola

Senior Member
Dec 10, 2012
2,638
88
48
Here she is being kicked off. [video=youtube;xWv99n6L9kA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWv99n6L9kA[/video]
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
26
38
It's so silly that some people on here make offensive statements about someone or a group of people (like what liberal women look like for example) but get upset when someone else, like a writer at SNL, does the same thing about Barron. They scream "crossing the line!" They have a sense of humor when they make "jokes" but suddenly lose it when it's done to someone they like. Trump/Hillary/Republicans/Democrats don't have a monopoly when it comes to hypocrisy.




You are absolutely correct as conservative Glenn Beck made offensive remarks about Obama's daughters as did others.
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,562
17,027
113
69
Tennessee


Favorite Trump term of the week.....

In my little golden book alternative facts = a lie....
The Trump term is going to run 4 years and not a week unless he is removed from office and an alternative is appointed to take his place. This is no lie. :)
 
J

Johnjo

Guest
The Trump term is going to run 4 years and not a week unless he is removed from office and an alternative is appointed to take his place. This is no lie. :)
"Alternative" is now the hallmark of his presidency:).
 

Tommy379

Notorious Member
Jan 12, 2016
7,589
1,153
113
I beg to differ with you - I have family who gave up a few years to go and serve in the Peace Corp in Africa and helped a lot of people there..... the world is bigger than just the US of A and it benefits all humanity to at least lend a helping hand to others.
I shouldn't be paying for it.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
I shouldn't be paying for it.
This is something I doubt Liberals will ever understand.

They think it is fine for your taxes and mine to fund their every whimsy and desire. But they do not want to pay one red cent, themselves, to build back up our military that is totally necessary to keep them safe and to give them the privilege to do all those things they would quickly be brought before a firing squad (with no trial in many cases) for doing in many other countries they defend as being better than the USA.
 
S

Susanna

Guest
This is something I doubt Liberals will ever understand.

They think it is fine for your taxes and mine to fund their every whimsy and desire. But they do not want to pay one red cent, themselves, to build back up our military that is totally necessary to keep them safe and to give them the privilege to do all those things they would quickly be brought before a firing squad (with no trial in many cases) for doing in many other countries they defend as being better than the USA.
You know, people are getting used to constantly being protected by the armed forces and the police and one day they've forgotten all about the men and women protecting them around the clock, because said men and women are protecting them. I guess you can be to good at what you do at times...
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
Favorite Trump term of the week.....

In my little golden book alternative facts = a lie....
Alternate Facts:


I realize the words that came out of Conway's mouth in a live interview sounded silly.
I get it.



Nonetheless, CNN DID LIE about inauguration attendance:




1. CNN posted a pic of the Washington Mall taken WAY BEFORE peak attendance.


2. CNN CLAIMED this pic was taken at peak attendance.


3. This pic which they CLAIMED was taken at peak attendance showed the Washington Mall was half empty.


4. It is provable, from OTHER PICS ON CNN'S OWN SITE, that CNN LIED, and the Washington Mall was FULL during peak attendance.

LINK:
Here is the link to a LATER, and DIFFERENT picture on CNN'S own site, which verifies the Washington Mall was FULL.
You can turn the view around, toward the Lincoln Memorial, and zoom in, and see it for yourself.

Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump

CNN actually posted a pic of Trump's inauguration, prior to peak attendance (when the Mall was only half full) and compared this pic SIDE-BY-SIDE to a pic of Obama's inauguration, during actual peak attendance (when the Mall WAS full) just to create a FALSE NARRATIVE and LIE to the public.

LINK:
Here is the link to an EARLIER PICTURES put up by CNN, attempting to claim the Washington Mall was half empty for Trumps inauguration.
The 2 pics comparing Obama and Trump attendance are at top of page; you can click back and forth between the two.
* The Obama pic IS from peak attendance; the Trump pic is SIGNIFICANTLY PRIOR TO peak attendance... CNN compares 2 different types of pictures in order to lie to the public.

Comparing Donald Trump and Barack Obama's inaugural crowd sizes - CNNPolitics.com


5. It is also provable from various video footage and interviews that many people were stuck at check points, and were never able to even enter the event.

Many people could never even get INTO the inauguration.
This is a well known fact, and there is much video footage to verify this, and no major media outlet even DISCUSSED this in the smallest way.


6. When Spicer claimed Trump's inauguration was the most "widely viewed" inauguration around the world, CNN and other media outlets immediately attacked these statements, without checking any facts at all.

A. Over 30 million people watched the inauguration on television in the U.S.
B. You can find at least 30 million ONLINE INTERNET VIEWERS of the inauguration just from sourcing a dozen major websites... without even digging.
C. Actual numbers are unknown, but I'm sure you could poke around and find many more millions of views coming from online sources, and from various international media outlets.

Therefore, at the very least, Trump's and Spicer's claims are perfectly within the realm of being "reasonable."


7. As far as Trump's live attendance, and comparing it to Obama's live attendance: we really don't know the exact numbers for either event, and that isn't the main point or the main problem.

A. The main point is CNN posted a FAKE picture, showing the Washington Mall HALF EMPTY, and claiming this was from PEAK ATTENDANCE... and they created this FAKE NEWS to imply nobody liked Trump enough to show up for his inauguration.

Foul journalism.

B. Both Trump and Spicer said the live attendance "looked like" it was probably 1 million or 1.5 million ... they did not claim it absolutely WAS this number, nor does anyone really have definite numbers anyway. Also, the Washington Mall actually WAS FULL during the Trump event... clearly giving anyone there the impression the attendance was some very large number.

You can see pictures from the podium angle, where Trump was, and see that from his vantage point, the entire Washington Mall did look completely full. Also, you can view the Mall from other angles and see the mall WAS INDEED FULL.

(This does NOT mean that during Obama's inauguration there couldn't have been more people in the area, either squeezed into the Mall, or nearby. I don't think anyone suggested this, nor is it relevant to the thesis here.)


C. I am NOT making the claim Trump's live attendance was greater than Obama's live attendance.
I would assert that as our first black president, Obama did have an enormous attendance... and rightly so.
My assertion is simply that the Washington Mall WAS full during Trump's inauguration, and that CNN intentionally lied to the public about this.



Conclusion:

A. The Washington Mall WAS FULL during Trump's inauguration, and CNN LIED about this, intentionally, in order to disparage our 45th president.

B. The media attacked everything Trump and Spicer said about this, without checking any facts, even though CNN's lies were provable.

C. We don't know actual attendance numbers, and it SHOULD be irrelevant... but CNN keeps attacking everything Trump does... every day... over and over... whether they have facts or not.

D. If CNN would just choose to be HALFWAY honest, we could stop talking about all of these non-issue issues, like inauguration attendance.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
Events today around the world show how much liberalism has managed to leech its way into the social fabric, especailly with so called millennials. We first saw it with the Brexit campaigns with demonstrations against racism and that anyone who wanted to leave the EU was racist bigot. The nation voted to leave. The New World Liberals were still labelling everyone bigots and uneducated. We saw how they took to the streets to protest against Brexit and well we know the rest.

Now we come to Trump, no one thought he would win, so the New World Liberals are crying again, this time around the world, seeing Trump as the ultimate evil against women and a racist bigot. Now we have the demonstrations again, esitamtes about 80-100 thousand people packed into Trafalgar square alone, many cities had other marches and turn outs against Trump. Really. This is the UK idiots.

What has this world come to?

To me this march is a non issue. Ignore them and perhaps they'll go away. I have no respect for these women,0 respect. I didn't see any of these fems dancing around in vagina costumes when Bill Clinton played his trick with a cigar and an intern. I didn't see women around the world marching when Bill bedded women from the Govs. mansion to the WH. As someone on my FB page said "Bill would hump a snake if it would hold still long enough". But no protest when Hillary was nominated to run with Bill in tow back to the WH.

Besides that fact is the fact that one of the organizers of the march is Muslim and supports Sharia Law! In case you don't know,or have forgotten, here is a little taste of Sharia,

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-20202686

The couple threw acid on their daughter for looking at a boy. They didn't take her for medical help till the next morning. She said it was her destiny to die that way. The girls siblings are crying no understanding why their sister had to die. Totally satanic religion.

So to me the march is full of silly women and should be ignored. They have nothing to say worth hearing. As far as the subject of fems being ugly I wouldnt tar all with the same brush.But many go out of their way to look as manly as possible, hiding any feminine attributes at all. For a man that is attracted to women who act like women then yes,they might find many fems ugly. To me I dont look at the face,I look at their hearts and from what I saw thats where the ugliness was coming from.
 
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
252
0
Alternate Facts:


I realize the words that came out of Conway's mouth in a live interview sounded silly.
I get it.



Nonetheless, CNN DID LIE about inauguration attendance:




1. CNN posted a pic of the Washington Mall taken WAY BEFORE peak attendance.


2. CNN CLAIMED this pic was taken at peak attendance.


3. This pic which they CLAIMED was taken at peak attendance showed the Washington Mall was half empty.


4. It is provable, from OTHER PICS ON CNN'S OWN SITE, that CNN LIED, and the Washington Mall was FULL during peak attendance.

LINK:
Here is the link to a LATER, and DIFFERENT picture on CNN'S own site, which verifies the Washington Mall was FULL.
You can turn the view around, toward the Lincoln Memorial, and zoom in, and see it for yourself.

Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump

CNN actually posted a pic of Trump's inauguration, prior to peak attendance (when the Mall was only half full) and compared this pic SIDE-BY-SIDE to a pic of Obama's inauguration, during actual peak attendance (when the Mall WAS full) just to create a FALSE NARRATIVE and LIE to the public.

LINK:
Here is the link to an EARLIER PICTURES put up by CNN, attempting to claim the Washington Mall was half empty for Trumps inauguration.
The 2 pics comparing Obama and Trump attendance are at top of page; you can click back and forth between the two.
* The Obama pic IS from peak attendance; the Trump pic is SIGNIFICANTLY PRIOR TO peak attendance... CNN compares 2 different types of pictures in order to lie to the public.

Comparing Donald Trump and Barack Obama's inaugural crowd sizes - CNNPolitics.com


5. It is also provable from various video footage and interviews that many people were stuck at check points, and were never able to even enter the event.

Many people could never even get INTO the inauguration.
This is a well known fact, and there is much video footage to verify this, and no major media outlet even DISCUSSED this in the smallest way.


6. When Spicer claimed Trump's inauguration was the most "widely viewed" inauguration around the world, CNN and other media outlets immediately attacked these statements, without checking any facts at all.

A. Over 30 million people watched the inauguration on television in the U.S.
B. You can find at least 30 million ONLINE INTERNET VIEWERS of the inauguration just from sourcing a dozen major websites... without even digging.
C. Actual numbers are unknown, but I'm sure you could poke around and find many more millions of views coming from online sources, and from various international media outlets.

Therefore, at the very least, Trump's and Spicer's claims are perfectly within the realm of being "reasonable."


7. As far as Trump's live attendance, and comparing it to Obama's live attendance: we really don't know the exact numbers for either event, and that isn't the main point or the main problem.

A. The main point is CNN posted a FAKE picture, showing the Washington Mall HALF EMPTY, and claiming this was from PEAK ATTENDANCE... and they created this FAKE NEWS to imply nobody liked Trump enough to show up for his inauguration.

Foul journalism.

B. Both Trump and Spicer said the live attendance "looked like" it was probably 1 million or 1.5 million ... they did not claim it absolutely WAS this number, nor does anyone really have definite numbers anyway. Also, the Washington Mall actually WAS FULL during the Trump event... clearly giving anyone there the impression the attendance was some very large number.

You can see pictures from the podium angle, where Trump was, and see that from his vantage point, the entire Washington Mall did look completely full. Also, you can view the Mall from other angles and see the mall WAS INDEED FULL.

(This does NOT mean that during Obama's inauguration there couldn't have been more people in the area, either squeezed into the Mall, or nearby. I don't think anyone suggested this, nor is it relevant to the thesis here.)


C. I am NOT making the claim Trump's live attendance was greater than Obama's live attendance.
I would assert that as our first black president, Obama did have an enormous attendance... and rightly so.
My assertion is simply that the Washington Mall WAS full during Trump's inauguration, and that CNN intentionally lied to the public about this.



Conclusion:

A. The Washington Mall WAS FULL during Trump's inauguration, and CNN LIED about this, intentionally, in order to disparage our 45th president.

B. The media attacked everything Trump and Spicer said about this, without checking any facts, even though CNN's lies were provable.

C. We don't know actual attendance numbers, and it SHOULD be irrelevant... but CNN keeps attacking everything Trump does... every day... over and over... whether they have facts or not.

D. If CNN would just choose to be HALFWAY honest, we could stop talking about all of these non-issue issues, like inauguration attendance.
Liberals: SO TOLERENT THEY HAVE TO LIE
 
Dec 1, 2014
9,701
252
0
To me this march is a non issue. Ignore them and perhaps they'll go away. I have no respect for these women,0 respect. I didn't see any of these fems dancing around in vagina costumes when Bill Clinton played his trick with a cigar and an intern. I didn't see women around the world marching when Bill bedded women from the Govs. mansion to the WH. As someone on my FB page said "Bill would hump a snake if it would hold still long enough". But no protest when Hillary was nominated to run with Bill in tow back to the WH.

Besides that fact is the fact that one of the organizers of the march is Muslim and supports Sharia Law! In case you don't know,or have forgotten, here is a little taste of Sharia,

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-20202686

The couple threw acid on their daughter for looking at a boy. They didn't take her for medical help till the next morning. She said it was her destiny to die that way. The girls siblings are crying no understanding why their sister had to die. Totally satanic religion.

So to me the march is full of silly women and should be ignored. They have nothing to say worth hearing. As far as the subject of fems being ugly I wouldnt tar all with the same brush.But many go out of their way to look as manly as possible, hiding any feminine attributes at all. For a man that is attracted to women who act like women then yes,they might find many fems ugly. To me I dont look at the face,I look at their hearts and from what I saw thats where the ugliness was coming from.
Yeah, but . . . but . . . think about the children. ;)
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
Yeah, but . . . but . . . think about the children. ;)

Oh,thanks for reminding me! Another reason I have no respect for them,abortion. How can you stand for womens rights and not unborn women?!