Christian Leaders Threaten Civil Disobedience Pending SCOTUS Gay Marriage Ruling
- Thread starter crossnote
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Zoophiles unite! LOL
Seriously though, sex is not a civil right.
That's the whole issue in the homosexual agenda. They have equal rights as people but their perversion is not granted immunity from being called deviant.
Well, at least not until they harassed the American Psychiatric Association so as to force them,under duress, to change their categorizing of homosexuality as a mental disorder in future publications of the DSM. Starting with, if I'm not mistaken, DSM IV.
That is what set this whole thing about homosexual marriage to be pursued on Constitutional grounds.
The mentally infirm can't argue for the right to be mentally infirm and thereby "equal" to others not so afflicted.
Otherwise, they were equal. They just weren't entitled to display their mental illness, their sexual deviance, in public.
Now, all that's changed because, and like everything else pertaining to icons and term references to and within their community, they've hijacked the civil rights struggle that blacks underwent in this country and claimed theirs is now on par with that in a contemporary respect.
Hogwash of course. Race is not a choice. Race is an obvious proven genetic factor.
While homosexuality is not. It's a deviant behavior and one that is often a choice or the end result of abuse. But it has not been proven to be genetic. It's aberrant and contrary to natural law so that genetic factor for normalcy isn't about to be found.
Even the APA, when they agreed under bullying pressure to alter the DSM's for future publication, did not do so having advanced that edit on new scientific discoveries that refuted their prior diagnosis. It was only a matter of public pressure from the homosexual community that caused the change.
Now though those who are diagnosed as mentally ill by the APA of old are able to adopt, or retain surrogates. They're able to silence Christians opposed on moral and religious grounds, while being above the laws themselves when they discriminate against Christians because politicians are all consumed with reparations to the lawful discrimination that use to protect America from deviant sexual behaviorists.
And in matters of consent. One can consent to being hit by a car while their buddies film the idiocy in hopes of making either the Darwin Awards top 10, or a spot on YouTube under the heading, today's dumbest. That doesn't make it right.
And as actor, if he ever works again, Doug Hutchison proved when he married his 16 year old victim having met her when she was 14, the consent that allowed a ephebophile to wed there was that of the victims parents signing consent on her behalf.
Think about that. An ephebophile married a minor child with her parents consent. That wasn't marched for. That wasn't pursued invoking similarity in the struggle to that of the blacks civil rights. That consent was able to be inked under the law that already existed in his state. It could even be national.
Homosexuals and trans-afflicted aren't starting our nation on the road to Hell. They're in the front of the parade of a whole string of deviants who've been engineering this nations southbound ride for years!
It's not homophobic to stand up for Christ.
And as a point of note, the other, of many, terms that the homo-sexual community hijacked is that term; homophobic.
In the beginning its true definition concerned a straight male being worried his mannerisms, like effeminate traits, how he dressed, etc... would make some think he was homosexual. Therefore he was 'phobic' (afraid) of being thought homosexual-(homo) i.e. homophobic.
Christians aren't homophobic. We're scripturally inclined and morally focused against unnatural behaviorists who think they're equal to straights.
Homo-sexuality doesn't stand equal to heterosexual sex.
How absurd to think it PC to say otherwise.
Seriously though, sex is not a civil right.
That's the whole issue in the homosexual agenda. They have equal rights as people but their perversion is not granted immunity from being called deviant.
Well, at least not until they harassed the American Psychiatric Association so as to force them,under duress, to change their categorizing of homosexuality as a mental disorder in future publications of the DSM. Starting with, if I'm not mistaken, DSM IV.
That is what set this whole thing about homosexual marriage to be pursued on Constitutional grounds.
The mentally infirm can't argue for the right to be mentally infirm and thereby "equal" to others not so afflicted.
Otherwise, they were equal. They just weren't entitled to display their mental illness, their sexual deviance, in public.
Now, all that's changed because, and like everything else pertaining to icons and term references to and within their community, they've hijacked the civil rights struggle that blacks underwent in this country and claimed theirs is now on par with that in a contemporary respect.
Hogwash of course. Race is not a choice. Race is an obvious proven genetic factor.
While homosexuality is not. It's a deviant behavior and one that is often a choice or the end result of abuse. But it has not been proven to be genetic. It's aberrant and contrary to natural law so that genetic factor for normalcy isn't about to be found.
Even the APA, when they agreed under bullying pressure to alter the DSM's for future publication, did not do so having advanced that edit on new scientific discoveries that refuted their prior diagnosis. It was only a matter of public pressure from the homosexual community that caused the change.
Now though those who are diagnosed as mentally ill by the APA of old are able to adopt, or retain surrogates. They're able to silence Christians opposed on moral and religious grounds, while being above the laws themselves when they discriminate against Christians because politicians are all consumed with reparations to the lawful discrimination that use to protect America from deviant sexual behaviorists.
And in matters of consent. One can consent to being hit by a car while their buddies film the idiocy in hopes of making either the Darwin Awards top 10, or a spot on YouTube under the heading, today's dumbest. That doesn't make it right.
And as actor, if he ever works again, Doug Hutchison proved when he married his 16 year old victim having met her when she was 14, the consent that allowed a ephebophile to wed there was that of the victims parents signing consent on her behalf.
Think about that. An ephebophile married a minor child with her parents consent. That wasn't marched for. That wasn't pursued invoking similarity in the struggle to that of the blacks civil rights. That consent was able to be inked under the law that already existed in his state. It could even be national.
Homosexuals and trans-afflicted aren't starting our nation on the road to Hell. They're in the front of the parade of a whole string of deviants who've been engineering this nations southbound ride for years!
It's not homophobic to stand up for Christ.
And as a point of note, the other, of many, terms that the homo-sexual community hijacked is that term; homophobic.
In the beginning its true definition concerned a straight male being worried his mannerisms, like effeminate traits, how he dressed, etc... would make some think he was homosexual. Therefore he was 'phobic' (afraid) of being thought homosexual-(homo) i.e. homophobic.
Christians aren't homophobic. We're scripturally inclined and morally focused against unnatural behaviorists who think they're equal to straights.
Homo-sexuality doesn't stand equal to heterosexual sex.
How absurd to think it PC to say otherwise.
OK, so we'll just let anyone marry anyone else -- or anything else.
A
. ‘Father’ to marry ‘son,’ with court’s blessing!
Well, at least 'legally' father/son.
But still this is the type of craziness coming.
Well, at least 'legally' father/son.
But still this is the type of craziness coming.
I find this interesting. I just wonder to what extent they mean "civil disobedience." Do they mean like peaceful walks or something? Because I know if they legalized gay marriage in Arizona my pastor would by no means marry a person. Would that be considered civil disobedience? Because if that's the case then I'm all for that kind of disobedience.
O
organizations that engage in sexual perversion with who or whatever, is assessable right here, right now people,
on the internet...
and, this is acceptable with many - so we have wonder, when will it be acceptable with the majority?
what evil will show its head Next, because we do know that evil begets evil and something terrible in is the works
that will be disguised as something good and something for all good
citizens to get-aboard the band-wagon?????
PSALM 119:126.
It is time for You, Lord, to work, for they have made void Thy Law.'
on the internet...
and, this is acceptable with many - so we have wonder, when will it be acceptable with the majority?
what evil will show its head Next, because we do know that evil begets evil and something terrible in is the works
that will be disguised as something good and something for all good
citizens to get-aboard the band-wagon?????
PSALM 119:126.
It is time for You, Lord, to work, for they have made void Thy Law.'