T
The grouping of socialism/communism into one camp was a flaw in the polling. One can easily be a socialist but not ascribe to the tenets of Marx. Just ask Benito Moussolini, Saint Simon, and Charles Fourier.
I lumped them together because many Americans seem to use them somewhat interchangeably.
Technically, according to the original meanings of the words, socialism is the "transition stage" from capitalism to communism. In practice, it has become "communism lite" -- the acceptance of certain programs being run by the government without giving over total authority of every last aspect of everything to the government. In true communism, EVERYTHING is controlled by the government: property, groceries, toothpicks, etc. This is what Marx envisioned. Marx predicted that nations would move to that system slowly, one program at a time. Today, countries recognize total communism is crazy (to put it bluntly), but that some things MUST be run by government. Heck, EVERY goverenment that has ever existed has had elements of socialism -- or else it wouldn't be a government. The very act of being a government, governing, is socialistic in nature. The more programs that are controlled by the government, the more socialist a country is. We (the U.S.) have socialized military and infrastructure. We sort of have socialized education, but public schools aren't so much run by the government as vice-versa. And even after Obamacare is in full swing, we will NOT have socialized medicine, not even close. Most health care will still be delivered by private (probably mostly non-profit) corporations.
I didn't really mean to get into a discussion of political systems, but I totally get what you're saying.