Saddleback Church Ousted from Southern Baptist Convention Over Female Pastor

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,781
13,414
113
Yes, But women cannot be pastors, deacons etc, it’s not scriptural
Paul would disagree with you...

Romans 16:1 I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a deacon of the church in Cenchreae. (NIV)

Also, there isn't a verse in the entire Bible saying that women cannot be pastors.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,071
5,424
113
62
Paul would disagree with you...

Romans 16:1 I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a deacon of the church in Cenchreae. (NIV)

Also, there isn't a verse in the entire Bible saying that women cannot be pastors.
Just looking for a fuller understanding of what you believe--holding up white flag--

Why do you believe the term deacon should be preferred over servant in Romans 1?
Also, how do you reconcile verses that seem to teach that overseers should be husbands of one wife and rule well their families?
 

ButterflyJones

Active member
Feb 5, 2023
698
230
43
I think its just means there are no longer any suitable men in that church who are capable of pastoring. Women have always been (unpaid) shepherdesses its nothing new.
God calls whom he will to minister his word.

I think it evident when Paul stated we are all one in Christ Jesus, as he proved when he did not discriminate against women serving in ministry in the churches he founded, as prophetesses, or walking with him as what we today call missionaries, when gender discrimination does enter into a church today that it is not because of Paul's example. Or teaching.

Paul would fail to be consistent in his teachings if he stated we are all one in Christ if someone then insists Paul said women cannot teach in church or have authority because they are women.

The idea that is precisely what Paul taught is not only false but cannot be a falsehood defended as his truth using the argument that women are inferior due to their sex.

Not when women are the God ordained gateway by which new life enters this world. And certainly not when by one man sin entered the world because that man followed his woman's example, while abandoning God's teaching and command.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,071
5,424
113
62
God calls whom he will to minister his word.

I think it evident when Paul stated we are all one in Christ Jesus, as he proved when he did not discriminate against women serving in ministry in the churches he founded, as prophetesses, or walking with him as what we today call missionaries, when gender discrimination does enter into a church today that it is not because of Paul's example. Or teaching.

Paul would fail to be consistent in his teachings if he stated we are all one in Christ if someone then insists Paul said women cannot teach in church or have authority because they are women.

The idea that is precisely what Paul taught is not only false but cannot be a falsehood defended as his truth using the argument that women are inferior due to their sex.

Not when women are the God ordained gateway by which new life enters this world. And certainly not when by one man sin entered the world because that man followed his woman's example, while abandoning God's teaching and command.
The idea isn't that women are inferior in Christ. Is Christ inferior to the Father. No. But His role did require Him to take a subservient position.
Those who believe women cannot serve because they are of less value in the body of Christ are clearly wrong. Those that view it as a matter of hierarchy aren't denigrating the value of women. They believe they have a biblical basis.
You may not agree with their conclusions but their motivation isn't necessarily bad.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,035
1,733
113
The idea isn't that women are inferior in Christ. Is Christ inferior to the Father. No. But His role did require Him to take a subservient position.
Those who believe women cannot serve because they are of less value in the body of Christ are clearly wrong. Those that view it as a matter of hierarchy aren't denigrating the value of women. They believe they have a biblical basis.
You may not agree with their conclusions but their motivation isn't necessarily bad.
It kinda does imply an inferiority tho. Christ submitted to the Father, yet Thomas still called Him, my Lord and my God. And even Father lifted Him up, saying, this is My Beloved Son. Listen to Him.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,071
5,424
113
62
It kinda does imply an inferiority tho. Christ submitted to the Father, yet Thomas still called Him, my Lord and my God. And even Father lifted Him up, saying, this is My Beloved Son. Listen to Him.
Let's see...

Seated on a throne....laying in a manger...

Worshipped and adored....ridiculed and scorned...

Creating planets and stars....making an end table...

Not inferior at all.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,607
13,017
113
God calls whom he will to minister his word.
That statement has to be carefully scrutinized. The ministry of the Word is given to those who have received one of these spiritual gifts: apostle, prophet, evangelist, pastor, or teacher. Elders within a church would have these gifts, and God has spelled out the qualification of elders in detail. And God has limited these spiritual gifts to men (males) for a very specific reason.

Elders are not deacons, and deacons are not elders. And in the New Testament churches, there was always a plurality of elders called "the presbytery" in Scripture (not just one man trying to be the shepherd for a whole church). No women were allowed to be elders or deacons. This is also why Christian women are commanded (a) to cover their heads during worship and (b) remain silent during worship. Furthermore they may not preach, or teach, or usurp authority within a local church. Even the Catholic church (for all its false teachings and much of its history) barred women from becoming "priests". That is because of what is in the Bible.

If you care to explore all this in Scripture, do your due diligence (going all the way back to Moses and the elders of Israel). But do not try and pervert or minimize the truth. The Southern Baptist Convention -- for all its faults -- did what was biblical in ousting Saddleback church from their fellowship (of course too little and too late). But today many Christians (including Rick Warren) reject Bible truth because it does not suit their fancy. And then we have a whole host of false apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers on radio and TV.
 

ButterflyJones

Active member
Feb 5, 2023
698
230
43
The idea isn't that women are inferior in Christ. Is Christ inferior to the Father. No. But His role did require Him to take a subservient position.
Those who believe women cannot serve because they are of less value in the body of Christ are clearly wrong. Those that view it as a matter of hierarchy aren't denigrating the value of women. They believe they have a biblical basis.
You may not agree with their conclusions but their motivation isn't necessarily bad.
Yet it is in error.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,035
1,733
113
Let's see...

Seated on a throne....laying in a manger...

Worshipped and adored....ridiculed and scorned...

Creating planets and stars....making an end table...

Not inferior at all.
I was speaking toward the claim of the regard of women' equality to men's comparison to God the Son's equality to God the Father. Nowhere did the Father ever pat the Son on the Head and tell Him, 'Now be a good Boy."
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
15,071
5,424
113
62
I was speaking toward the claim of the regard of women' equality to men's comparison to God the Son's equality to God the Father. Nowhere did the Father ever pat the Son on the Head and tell Him, 'Now be a good Boy."
Somehow I can't picture someone patting you on the head. Not twice anyway.
I know that the treatment of women throughout history has been wanting. I even recognize there are men in the body of Christ who perpetuate the same. I don't excuse their behavior. But a blanket denouncement is often evidence of some injustice that left scars that have yet to heal and doesn't address the real issue.
 

ButterflyJones

Active member
Feb 5, 2023
698
230
43
That statement has to be carefully scrutinized. The ministry of the Word is given to those who have received one of these spiritual gifts: apostle, prophet, evangelist, pastor, or teacher. Elders within a church would have these gifts, and God has spelled out the qualification of elders in detail. And God has limited these spiritual gifts to men (males) for a very specific reason.

Elders are not deacons, and deacons are not elders. And in the New Testament churches, there was always a plurality of elders called "the presbytery" in Scripture (not just one man trying to be the shepherd for a whole church). No women were allowed to be elders or deacons. This is also why Christian women are commanded (a) to cover their heads during worship and (b) remain silent during worship. Furthermore they may not preach, or teach, or usurp authority within a local church. Even the Catholic church (for all its false teachings and much of its history) barred women from becoming "priests". That is because of what is in the Bible.

If you care to explore all this in Scripture, do your due diligence (going all the way back to Moses and the elders of Israel). But do not try and pervert or minimize the truth. The Southern Baptist Convention -- for all its faults -- did what was biblical in ousting Saddleback church from their fellowship (of course too little and too late). But today many Christians (including Rick Warren) reject Bible truth because it does not suit their fancy. And then we have a whole host of false apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers on radio and TV.
All one has to do is not insist God practices the sin of sex discrimination.

Every last woman serving in an office in God's churches, from pastor to Sunday school proves God calls whom he wills to his service. Because he said, we are all one in him.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,035
1,733
113
Somehow I can't picture someone patting you on the head. Not twice anyway.
:ROFL:
I know that the treatment of women throughout history has been wanting. I even recognize there are men in the body of Christ who perpetuate the same. I don't excuse their behavior. But a blanket denouncement is often evidence of some injustice that left scars that have yet to heal and doesn't address the real issue.
I'm only speaking to the former. And the brothers that know better are those who've help tremendously in the healing, even if there is no intent or maybe ever realizing it.
 

2ndTimeIsTheCharm

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2023
1,446
754
113
How are they ' fortunate' to have a chaplain that is out of line with Scripture?

The Scriptures are His Truth never meant to be thee socially acceptable plan of the world.

If you read the Bible, God does make exceptions where male leadership is lacking. This thread has already gone over that.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
6,035
1,733
113
If you read the Bible, God does make exceptions where male leadership is lacking. This thread has already gone over that.
I might challenge the "where male leadership is lacking" qualification when I feel more ambitious, and energetic.
 

Lanolin

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2018
23,460
7,178
113
Saddleback sounds like a bunch of brats who cant handle it when theres a female at the helm

sorry
so, if your mother is a widow does that mean she cant lead your family?

What about the Queen of England, who had no brothers, did people expect her husband Prince Phillip to take over just cos he was male.

When you the firstborn female, you take on the role of firstborn. You dont wait for the firstborn male.

Im sorry does everyone just expect all families to have firstborns as males? doesnt happen in real life.
 

Beckie

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
2,516
935
113
If you read the Bible, God does make exceptions where male leadership is lacking. This thread has already gone over that.
Your post implies i have not read the Bible. A woman, a man being in their Godly places, or roles, is a good part of what makes them Godly. As Christians should we be striving to live according to His ideals or those of the world?
You mentioned Deborah and a couple others . There is the obedient strength of Ruth, who is a grandmother of Jesus. The wisdom and fearlessness of Esther, God used to save the Israelites, the bravery of Rahab another grandmother of Jesus. The women Paul speaks of were strong to live through what was being done to Christians at that time.

Chocolate ice cream is a favorite but i dont want it on apple pie. So much of todays world is man hating. Todays Godless woman does all she can to emasculate . Terms like toxic masculinity is what the world thinks of God's creation. Toxic feminism has murder over 60 million in the last 50 or so years. Who is toxic? We both male and female are not called to walk one foot in the ways of the world and the other on His path.
 

Beckie

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2022
2,516
935
113
Saddleback sounds like a bunch of brats who cant handle it when theres a female at the helm

sorry
so, if your mother is a widow does that mean she cant lead your family?

What about the Queen of England, who had no brothers, did people expect her husband Prince Phillip to take over just cos he was male.

When you the firstborn female, you take on the role of firstborn. You dont wait for the firstborn male.

Im sorry does everyone just expect all families to have firstborns as males? doesnt happen in real life.
LOL really the first born female is the first born female the first born male is the first born male.
 

Lanolin

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2018
23,460
7,178
113
LOL really the first born female is the first born female the first born male is the first born male.
firstborn is firstborn doesnt matter if male or female.