A philosophical argument is not proof you really don't get that,
How is it not? You use philosophy to try and prove God doesn't exist. Whether you recognize it or not. Science is a philosophy.
How can a man physically live to 930 years old a human being can not do so?
After the flood of Noah, things changed, people didn't live past 120. So whatever it was, is different now.
My values and standards are no less valid then those you may have
Do you know what it means for morality to be Objective, Subjective, or Nihilistic?
Watch this video, and summarize it. I'll be waiting for your response.
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKkcZ9ZSI5o[/video]
and in terms of Christ there may of been a man called Jesus Christ it doesn't mean he was a god
We don't claim that simply because he existed he was a god. Nor do we claim he was a god(this would imply many gods,thus polytheism). We claim he was God.
and was then ressurected there is no proof for that.
Depends on your evidential base, if you are a naturalist, you can't allow for that to begin with, regardless of the evidence.
If you're a naturalist, I see no reason why you should accept the resurrection based on historical analysis.