With that it's the same as prohibition, how when alcohol was illegal it basically created the mob
The mob has always existed. Prohibition just fueled it. Yes, during prohibition less people drank, and even less amounts. Prices just rose, and it became highly profitable for organized crime. People just wanted their alcohol, and ignored what their money went to.
however once it was made legal again the mod died because it ran out of money.
Organized crime will just move to something else that is just as profitable or a little less profitable.
The same logic can be applied to the drug cartel.
You've provided my answer, to the organized crime moving to other things.
What logic is beyond me is why the government spends millions on a drug "war" that we will never win, when if instead they made it legal and taxed people for buying it.
We spend millions to try and eliminate poverty, we should give up because we will never win.
Then also used that money to help people in treatment
I agree, treatment is better than punishment to start. When do we say, "enough is enough?"
if they want it the amount of wasted money especially now will turn into a surplus of money.
It costs the amount it does now, because it is illegal. Once it's legal, it'll be cheap. Theres not a lot to be made through taxation, when it grows wild.
A common counter to this argument, is that you can make moonshine in a bathtub. Marijuana grows wild in many places of the Midwest and Southern United States, while alcohol doesn't occur naturally to this degree. There is some natural fermentation though.
[/quote]
In countries that have made drugs legal
[/quote]
Not one country has fully legalized drugs. There are some who have taken the "tolerance of drugs" route, which typically includes softer drugs, such as Marijuana, and Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD).
The Netherlands which is notorious for its tolerance of soft drugs, prostitution, and many other not-so-tolerated things here in America, has taken some steps against it.
Amsterdam To Close Many Of Its Brothels, Marijuana Cafes, Sex Shops
they find people are willing to enter treatment more
This is true.
and the
amount of people actually addicted to drugs goes down.
I wouldn't say the addiction rates go down, but definitely casual use does go down.
It takes the mystery and feeling of danger that people get out of these things
To this I agree. See Genesis for a great example. "forbidden fruit"
an all in all is better for a country.
Not so sure about this. Even in the Netherlands the government recognizes it is a huge social problem. They just focus their time and energy less on it.
As far as using something to feel good, that's why everyone should understand moderation, and when you practice it fully then you don't have to worry about something taking over your life.
Why use Marijuana recreationaly to feel good? Isn't God enough? Notice I said recreationaly, I think if under the guidance of a doctor, it could be used to help with many medical problems, such as aquiring appetite after chemo and radiation.
I drink wine on a daily basis, I have been drunk in total 2 times this year. (Counting a full year from this date not from the start of the calendar year. One of those times I was at a wedding.) If someone lives like I do and lets something be a part of your life but not consume your life then you are living well.
I think that is a level of maturity though that everyone should work on having.
Drinking small (moderated) amounts of red wine can greatly improve the condition of the heart. Sometimes it can help keep away heart attacks, strokes, aneurysms, and many other circulatory complications. This is a wise thing to do. Yes, it does require maturity to be moderate in consumption.
I don't think recreational use of Marijuana, or any drug is wise. I don't hold a double-standard on "drugs", I personally think we rely too much on "pill-popping" to make us feel good. I'll tough through a headache, unless it gets absolutely unbearable. At that point, I will only take one Tylenol, and not two, as Tylenol's active ingredient has a high potential to harm your liver.
I take a constitutional stance on Marijuana legalization. The United States government at a federal level, has the right to restrict foreign produced drugs to come into this country, through direct acquisition, tariffs, or other constitutional methods. Anything not specifically mentioned in the Constitution, is up to each state to decide how to act. Marijuana and drugs are not addressed in the Federal Constitution, so there for each state has the right to regulate or de-regulate Marijuana and drugs within it's borders, but not outside. Each state can do this through direct means, or through tariffs. If we followed the Constitution 100%, we wouldn't have social issues being debated on the national level. Each state could decide for itself.
California, while I disagree with the idea, they could legalize Marijuana if the citizens wanted to. South Carolina, shouldn't be forced to legalize it though, if they don't want to. If we followed this concept, we would be better off.