It is so easy for all of us to say how the rape victim should fee, how the rape victim should interprit her rape, how the rape victim should tell her future husband because HE MIGHT FEEL DEFRAUDED. So tell me guys when does it become about the vicitm??? When does it come about how she or he wants to process it???? When does it NOT become about how anybody she might come across might feel about her just because she deals with it on the level she knows best how to.
How dare we decide how she should feel, how dare we suggest how she or he should interprit it. How many of you have sat opposite someone who has been raped? All we ever need to do is love people with the love of the Lord. .
It must be awful to be the victim of rape. I know it must be difficult to deal with that. But the fact that a woman getting off as a virgin when she wasn't one is so wicked in the sight of God that He gave a righteous and just law to Israel that such women should be stoned is a pretty good reason to tell a prospective husband. In the Old Testament, the man who could have his wife stoned for not being a virgin on her wedding night had paid a bride price for virgins.
Let's say a man was missing certain reproductive organs, maybe certain parts that could make having a baby possible, or say he knew he was sterile. Shouldn't he disclose that before getting married? Let's say some street gang had tortured him and cut off parts of him, and he had suffered that trauma. Would his trauma justify his not telling his future wife that he wouldn't be able to function as a normal man in this regard or have children? I'd say it would be wicked for him to willingly withold this information.
It is a normal expectation to expect your partner to be a virgin on his/her wedding night. Just as it is a normal expectation to expect your partner to have the regular body parts and to be able to bear children. If you are unable to provide any of these things, you should disclose it so the other person can make up their mind with all the information.
And quite frankly if that husband on the wedding night feels defrauded it would be off to the divorce courts for me first thing in the morning. To think that I fell in love with and married a man I had to share my past with??? Where is this is the word? I am responsible to him only AFTER my marriage for my acts and happenings
In the Old Testament, instead of the divorce court, it could have been the field with the stones in it, for her, and not for him. Hopefully, someone who has gone through such trauma will heal up first. I know there are people who repress memories.
Just from a practical perspective, wouldn't it be incredibly foolish for a woman to wilingly withold the fact that she had been raped from a future spouse? Shouldn't she be know that he will accept that fact and accept her and her past before marrying him? What if it were a problem for him, afterwards?
If she knows he is wanting to marry a virgin-- and it could be a sin against his conscience not to if you think about it-- and she lies about it after she was raped, that's a horrible thing to do to her husband, even though something horrible had been done to her.