R
you still don't have your facts straight, nor your charges.
keep absorbing from others, one day you might get it.
are they children of abraham or not?
if they are not, how is it the opposite of what i've said?
what i've said is anti-racist.
maybe you can correct me on a new what-does-the Talmud-say thread.
you've had time to tweak your story.
you, on the other hand are a typical american racist.
and ignorant as all get out.
lol....once again, you know nothing about the subject.
asking questions about the holocaust narrative gets you before a tribunal up here
you'll deny that too, likely.
or condone it.
you never did properly address the lies in the holocaust narrative here:
http://christianchat.com/miscellaneous/63081-6-000-000-a.html < click
if you can't handle the truth there, i can start another thread - just for you - to address the monstrous lies.
which serve their purpose daily.
you know so much....maybe you can set the record straight once and for all
now now rachel....i know people get angry when their issues are exposed.
you'll just have to deal with it like a big girl.
you could start today by expanding on your "simpler version" of how your criminal shadow govt led us all into war - for Israel. and how people like you waved the red-white-and-blue after relying on faulty intelligence.
and are still apparently unapologetic, and unrepentant.
see, that's not my problem. it's yours.
Donald Rumsfeld relied on faulty intelligence doesn't cut it.
i don't misrepresent confessional lutheranism.
find any post where i've misrepresented lutheranism
you just don't like the other stuff i post.
oh well.
keep absorbing from others, one day you might get it.
are they children of abraham or not?
if they are not, how is it the opposite of what i've said?
what i've said is anti-racist.
maybe you can correct me on a new what-does-the Talmud-say thread.
you've had time to tweak your story.
you, on the other hand are a typical american racist.
and ignorant as all get out.
lol....once again, you know nothing about the subject.
asking questions about the holocaust narrative gets you before a tribunal up here
you'll deny that too, likely.
or condone it.
you never did properly address the lies in the holocaust narrative here:
http://christianchat.com/miscellaneous/63081-6-000-000-a.html < click
if you can't handle the truth there, i can start another thread - just for you - to address the monstrous lies.
which serve their purpose daily.
you know so much....maybe you can set the record straight once and for all
now now rachel....i know people get angry when their issues are exposed.
you'll just have to deal with it like a big girl.
you could start today by expanding on your "simpler version" of how your criminal shadow govt led us all into war - for Israel. and how people like you waved the red-white-and-blue after relying on faulty intelligence.
and are still apparently unapologetic, and unrepentant.
see, that's not my problem. it's yours.
Donald Rumsfeld relied on faulty intelligence doesn't cut it.
i don't misrepresent confessional lutheranism.
find any post where i've misrepresented lutheranism
you just don't like the other stuff i post.
oh well.
you on the other hand continue to promote from time to time the proven -lie- that the ashkenazi jews are not descendants of abraham because they are turkic khazars instead...
how you don't see the difference is beyond me...it is as if every time you see anyone mention the word 'khazar' you just take it as an endorsement of your view -without actually reading anything else they wrote-
regarding racism...you have used your khazar myth to argue that the israelis have no right to the land currently occupied by the state of israel due to their supposedly being of the -wrong race- for the region...
and regarding ignorance...you are best described as a combination of ignorance and google...you try to impress people with lots of links and quotations from articles you -barely even read- let alone fact check and hope everyone will assume that lots of text means you did lots of homework...
i have no interest in debating the holocaust with you...let's just say i don't think there is any danger of anyone taking -you- seriously on that subject...
and regarding iraq...surprise! i was actually -against- the invasion of iraq...i didn't believe the reasons for the invasion...whether true or faulty...were worth the probable loss of life...
but not knowing what you are talking about as you falsely accuse people is nothing new with you...
now you and i both know what the lutheran confessions say about the antichrist and the man of lawlessness...which you have quite clearly expressed your determined disagreement with...
...or on second thought maybe you -don't- know what the lutheran confessions say...that certainly wouldn't be surprising considering how sloppy the rest of your 'research' is... so if you weren't aware...read 'articles vii and viii' of the apology of the augsburg confession...'article xv' of the apology of the same...'article xxiv' of the same...the section on 'the invocation of saints' in 'article ii' of 'part ii' of the smalcald articles...'article iv' of the same...the section on 'the marks of the antichrist' in the 'treatise on the power and primacy of the pope'...and 'article x' of the 'solid declaration' of the formula of concord...
after you read those you can come back and explain how you can profess confessional lutheranism while dissenting from the lutheran confessions...