but not a conspiracy to lie to you (all the world).
just lies after the fact to cover up blunders?
not sure.
maybe getting you confused with someone else.
This is business as usual, it's called hegemony.
alright.
nothing new then that the hegemonic powers make plans to hold their positions, regardless of the "price".
dollars and cents.
we agree on that.
again, i perhaps have had you confused with the people who live in reality, where no such hegemonic structure exists, neither does ever it work toward consolidating its power; nor make plans generations in advance.
That's not surprising to anyone who understands the concept of millions of US dollars in petroleum profits.
petroleum profits?
lol...if you say so.
I was against Iraq invasion because there's no evidence that Iraqis were involved in 9/11, and the United States was already busy in Afghanistan.
what were they doing in Afghanistan?
something about a coalition of the willing if i recall.
was it a reactionary strike following 9-11?
smoking out the bad guys kinda thing?
did they ever find them....or no.
nobody seems to want to post the names we have in the official narrative. i wonder why.
I was against Iraq invasion because there's no evidence that Iraqis were involved in 9/11
you knew even while Mr. Rumsfeld was relying on faulty intelligence that there was no evidence the Iraqis were involved in 9-11?
maybe you should have called the Pentagon.
Saddam appeared to be too dictatorial to allow Al-Qaeda to operate in Iraq, in my opinion.
Al-Qaeda?
was it Al-Qaeda Saddam was trying to keep out of Iraq?
or someone else?
did he get double-crossed?
what and who is Al-Qaeda?
Of course I have theories, and it's pretty obvious if you look at the way the language changed.
sounds like a conspiracy theory to me.
too bad you're a conspiracy theorist who picks and chooses his theories, and doesn't follow through with what he does know.
we could have had a conversation.
That was the Clinton administration, not Bush Jr. or Obama,
i see.
the administration changes...through the democratic voting process - but the policies and agendas remain the same.
same trajectory.
no inter-connectedness though.
just people reacting to mistakes and faulty intelligence.
actually the single agenda regardless of party is good indication you're under fascism.
the policies and world-wide aggression says global fascism.
eh...nah. that's ridiculous.
and her defense of genocide is obscene. I'm an American, I know what they do, but they still gave me only one vote.
but she was and still is walking around free.
defense of genocide?
how about active participation in it.
active involvement in planning for it.
any idea who she is?
The mistakes are the result of all the competent people preferring private industry jobs.
then...everything you just said is moot?
now you've gone back to mistakes.
and incompetence.
there was something about OIL.
and hegemony.
and neocons.
IT is the economic, political, and military hegemony of the United States.
is it?
broadly speaking that's a pat answer.
does that include you as an american?
how about your neighbor?
who is calling the shots down there?
any idea?
what interest doe the united States have in Iraq?
or Syria?
be specific if you could.
is it global hegemony?
when did that become american policy?
Too bad you're a Holocaust denier, we could have a real conversation about it.
do you have anything else?
you haven't asked me what i deny.
and you do not appear to know much about the subject. if you did you'd have said so.
so there's no conversation to be had.
Neocons are the latest incarnation of grand chessboard players. I have little tolerance for them because they're imperialistic and secretive. That doesn't make them competent.
grand chessboard players?
imperialistic and secretive?
that sounds mysterious.
who are they?
what are their names?
are they really secretive? or have they written extensive policy papers making it plain who they are and what they want?
you tell me.
anti-Semitism - Wiktionary
Noun
anti-Semitism (plural anti-Semitisms)
(narrower sense)
Prejudice, discrimination or hostility directed against Jews; anti-Jewism (anti-Jewishness).
Hate? I'd construct my language carefully if I lived in Canada. It's up to the RCMP if they want to "prove" anything.
yes...lots of pressure everywhere to silence criticism.
i wonder why?
why didn't you comment on this?
[video=youtube;D0kWAqZxJVE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0kWAqZxJVE[/video]
"Anti-semitic, its a trick we always use it"
is Former Israeli Minister Shulamit Aloni antisemitic?
just answer yes or no.
R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46
Public incitement of hatred
319. (1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Marginal note:Wilful promotion of hatred
(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
this proves what?
that i could wind up before a tribunal, based on your continuing unsubstantiated claim that i'm a holocaust denier?
you haven't defined Holocaust; denier; or exactly what you think it is i deny.
you haven't old me what the officially accepted narrative is, therefore, i don't know what parts you think i "deny".
that won't matter at all, though, since the issue not asking questions about WW2 and the events around it.
the issue is being stopped by any means possible from doing so.
i don't know if you commented on this video posted earlier either.
BILL MOYERS JOURNAL | Christian Zionism | PBS - Hagee and the Xtian Zionists call for:
a military
preemptive strike, on Iran....
to prevent...a nuclear holocaust.....in Israel.
this is acceptable speech, even welcomed and encouraged.
we hear it at the UN; from Tel Aviv; from Washington; from so-called churches in North America.
THE PROPOSAL -
an holocaust (death by burning) in Iran committed by the United States, for on Israel's behalf,
with no evidence whatsoever Iran has or are pursuing WMD <<<HEY THAT SOUNDS FAMILIAR is acceptable.
and american christians wave the israeli flag as they cheer for this.
these things are rarely if ever openly condemned.
we have Americans (?
) dropping bombs on japanese citizens - burning them alive.
we have Americans dropping napalm on Vietnamese burning them alive.
we have Israel dropping white phosphorous on Palestinians, burning them alive.
and then we have this:
Too bad you're a Holocaust denier.
according to the official definition, if you accept the [Jewish] Holocaust Historians
revised facts, so are you
no one was burned alive in death camps.
there were no death camps on German soil - Simon Wiesenthal
did you get around to addressing that?
because according to the original official definition (
which has been revised), Mr. Wiesenthal would have been a holocaust denier.
that's why none of you will ever truly address it.
you've been well trained.
sad, but true.
and it's your problem, not mine.