So no woman participates in these bible lessons or discussion in your church even though all males may say something wrong during the discussion which is not bible base and the woman cannot correct them there
So they are just to sit there and listen hmmm were there ever a time when the woman sat on one side and the men on the other during the times of the apostles ?
You are trying to find a way to use human logic to rationalize away the simple language of the prohibition through the use of scenarios. This will not work.
The inherent problem with using scenarios as a tool for challenging things in scripture is that scenarios are always rooted in one's own desires, whether consciously or unconsciously, and to render the biblical text contingent upon the context of the scenario. The scenario will always be presented as a human condition and are always the product of human intelligence. Here is what scenarios are designed to do.
1. Scenarios are an attempt to rationalize human will and behavior that is contrary to a foundational truth.
2. Scenarios will generally ignore the language of the biblical text.
3. Scenarios are used to justify a given human agenda. i.e. The end justifies the means.
4. Scenarios are an attempt to overturn the authority of the Word of God in favor of human will.
5. Scenarios exalt human intelligence above the intelligence of God.
6. Scenarios assume that the language of the biblical text cannot stand against the logical argument.
7. Scenarios assume that scripture will break down in the extreme case.
In short, the use of scenarios never add to our understand of the Word of God nor will they overturn the will of God.