G
GreenNnice
Guest
1. Its a mix of my last and first name dude. Its disrespectful and demeaning.
2. I agree with your point, but you are saying Phil is doing that, which he isn't because he uses scripture to prove his points. Scripture is God's word, so he is basing his faith of off God, not becoming or claiming to be God.
3. How do you know God is using them? Maybe they think they are called, but are not. God's word doesn't support, in fact is against, women teaching, so why are you for it if God is against it. I can say God is against it because he says he is in the bible.
1. ok, first and last name, i get it. anyway, point is, I'm not disrespecting you, Histuck, I nic everyone, it's something I do, I've been on c.c. 5+ years and I've always done that. Don't like it, that's fine, . Say 'hey, don't nic me.' no problem. A few do, not many, most like my nics for them. but, yeah, that's that, youngtuck
2. I use Scripture to prove my points. Isaiah 55 and, most recently, in my last post, no less, 1 Corinthians 2 . No, He is claiming to be God when he claims that no woman can be used by Him to preach and teach men in a church. God can do anything He wants, Histuck.
3. They are being used ! Again, don't be naive. OK, God's Word doesn't support it, yet, there they are leading a church that was dead before they arrived and now is producing fruit. That said, do I think that the church should be searching for a man to lead the congregation that the women put in order by God's will? Yes. I do. But, again, God could have that woman pastor that church for years and years too. Again, Isaiah 55 states, 'God's ways are different than ours and thoughts are higher.' God's purpose in this world is way beyond you and I's reason. And, again, too, I agree, in MOST cases, a woman is not the best choice for a congregation, if for no other rreason, there are too many men who will not lilsten to them--which is not right--but they understand Scripture that way as an absolute and it is sad, and, i'm sure God cries