THIS is part of the problem -- as I see it.
Never in my life until now have I even heard of such a thing.
The phrase "caught up" - 'expanded' into its FULL meaning - means "caught up
into the air" (
First Heaven - above the earth. ).
The phrase "caught up" - in of itself -
does not include the idea of "goes back to heaven with Jesus" ( and NEVER HAS, as far as I am concerned).
The idea of "goes back to heaven with Jesus" is totally and completely separate from the idea of "caught up"...
Even the people I know that believe the notion of "goes back to heaven with Jesus" -- to them, it is not part of "caught up" - but rather, a separate occurance that happens directly thereafter.
For some reason, people seem to want to include
just as many details of their belief-system as absolutely possible into the word 'rapture'.
Why can't people see 'rapture' as simply "caught up [ into the air ]"...???
Moreover,
some of the worst confusion is caused by people who-are-so-sure that when someone uses the word 'rapture' - "they
obviously MUST be including all-of-the-things-I-have-ever-heard-anyone-include-in-the-definition"...
If people would simply not ASSUME so much about what the other person means when they use the word 'rapture' -- DUH -- that would help a lot.
Least possible confusion: 'rapture' => "caught up" => "caught up
into the air"
I can disagree with someone "all day" about their notion of "goes back to heaven with Jesus" ( directly after the rapture ) - and tell them:
"It is not there." ( in the scriptures )
But I NEVER assume that anyone's definition of 'rapture' includes anything more than "caught up
into the air" --
unless they actually define it to mean more than that.