Well, maybe men shouldn't cut their beards. I'm just saying.
I think Yahweh had it in his mind how he wanted us to look. There are things he does in scripture for his own pleasure.
[SUP]Exodus 29:17 [/SUP]Cut the ram into pieces and wash the internal organs and the legs, putting them with the head and the other pieces. [SUP]18 [/SUP]Then burn the entire ram on the altar. It is a burnt offering to the Lord, a pleasing aroma, a food offering presented to the Lord.
In Yahweh's world, women look like women, and men have beards, and we are free from the marks the Pagans put on their skin, and we are like innocent children/lambs before him. (I could dig up scripture on all of that, if you want me to, but I'm guessing you've read them, too. )
I believe that being pleasing is important. In the word, it says my husband is my head, and my desire is for him. That makes sense to me now because truly I love to be pleasing to my husband. I love it when he says I please him. I love it when he is pleased and says nothing at all. We were made to be companions of Yahweh. In our naked creation he proclaimed our bodies: "GOOD." The way were were created pleases him. Why would we ever want to be not pleasing to him?
Should he lead me to a doctor to remove my tattoos, I would have them removed. I'm not opposed, if it would please My Father. However, I will cross that bridge when I come to it.
I think Yahweh had it in his mind how he wanted us to look. There are things he does in scripture for his own pleasure.
[SUP]Exodus 29:17 [/SUP]Cut the ram into pieces and wash the internal organs and the legs, putting them with the head and the other pieces. [SUP]18 [/SUP]Then burn the entire ram on the altar. It is a burnt offering to the Lord, a pleasing aroma, a food offering presented to the Lord.
In Yahweh's world, women look like women, and men have beards, and we are free from the marks the Pagans put on their skin, and we are like innocent children/lambs before him. (I could dig up scripture on all of that, if you want me to, but I'm guessing you've read them, too. )
I believe that being pleasing is important. In the word, it says my husband is my head, and my desire is for him. That makes sense to me now because truly I love to be pleasing to my husband. I love it when he says I please him. I love it when he is pleased and says nothing at all. We were made to be companions of Yahweh. In our naked creation he proclaimed our bodies: "GOOD." The way were were created pleases him. Why would we ever want to be not pleasing to him?
Should he lead me to a doctor to remove my tattoos, I would have them removed. I'm not opposed, if it would please My Father. However, I will cross that bridge when I come to it.
Hi there. MrsRoseTreasure:
I can appreciate what you are saying; it does still come back to how broadly you interpret the verse in Leviticus 19, evidently.
For example, in Isaiah 49.16, the Lord says: "I have graven thee upon the palms of my hand" (Amplified Bible: graven, tattooed) or in Ezekiel 16.12, where the Lord Himself gives earrings and even a nose ring to Zion; can it really be said that the Lord is going against whatever He is interpreted as saying in Leviticus 19?
No. This is my answer, anyway. (Saying yes would pose problems about the unity of Scripture.)
Maybe it can be said that the issue is not as clear-cut as uniquely basing a viewpoint on a very broad interpretation of one verse would make out.
(There are also still problems internal to Leviticus 19, in that preachers who try to apply the 'cutting' verse rather broadly and yet don't have a bushy beard, would seem to have no grounds to stand on.)
Blessings.
I can appreciate what you are saying; it does still come back to how broadly you interpret the verse in Leviticus 19, evidently.
For example, in Isaiah 49.16, the Lord says: "I have graven thee upon the palms of my hand" (Amplified Bible: graven, tattooed) or in Ezekiel 16.12, where the Lord Himself gives earrings and even a nose ring to Zion; can it really be said that the Lord is going against whatever He is interpreted as saying in Leviticus 19?
No. This is my answer, anyway. (Saying yes would pose problems about the unity of Scripture.)
Maybe it can be said that the issue is not as clear-cut as uniquely basing a viewpoint on a very broad interpretation of one verse would make out.
(There are also still problems internal to Leviticus 19, in that preachers who try to apply the 'cutting' verse rather broadly and yet don't have a bushy beard, would seem to have no grounds to stand on.)
Blessings.