No rather Christ is the fulfillment, and was not from the Levitical priesthood, under the Law of Moses
Hebrews 8:6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better
covenant, which was established upon better promises.
Hebrews 8:7 For if that first
covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
Hebrews 8:8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new
covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
Hebrews 8:9 not according to the
covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my
covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
Hebrews 8:10 For this
is the
covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
What Laws? The Laws of Love?
Hebrews 7:11-12
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
[SUP]11 [/SUP]If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need
was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? [SUP]12 [/SUP]For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.
On the mount of transfiguration the change came. Jesus built the new temple, and that's what Hebrews is referring to.
John 2:19 (KJV)
[SUP]
19 [/SUP]Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
I will quote where the added words covenant were in three verses when the writer was actually referring to the old temple, and talking about the physical priesthood that sacrifices in the temple mad by man.
Hebrews 8:7 (KJV)
[SUP]
7 [/SUP]For if that first "
covenant" (it was faulty because it was physical and not spiritual) had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
God didn't make a mistake. It is the flesh that made it faulty. Nevertheless, we are to compare spiritual with spiritual. That's what the old is for, to compare it with the newness in spirit.
Hebrews 8:13 (KJV)
[SUP]
13 [/SUP]In that he saith, A new "
covenant," (added word referring to the old temple) he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old
is ready to vanish away.
Hebrews 9:1 (KJV)
[SUP]
1 [/SUP]Then verily the first "
covenant" (Obviously sacrificial ordinances within the temple) had also ordinances of divine service, and a worldly sanctuary.
Acts 7:48-50 (KJV)
[SUP]
48 [/SUP]Howbeit the most High dwelleth
not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet,
[SUP]
49 [/SUP]Heaven
is my throne, and earth
is my footstool: what house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what
is the place of my rest?
[SUP]
50 [/SUP]Hath not my hand made all these things?
Isaiah 66:1-2 (KJV)
[SUP]
1 [/SUP]Thus saith the LORD, The heaven
is my throne, and the earth
is my footstool:
where is the house that ye build unto me? and where
is the place of my rest?
[SUP]
2 [/SUP]For all those
things hath mine hand made, and all those
things have been, saith the LORD: but to this
man will I look,
even to
him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word.