Is there such a thing as an atheist?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sep 10, 2013
1,428
19
0
Ah but we celebrate the social occasion not the day itself. Just as December 25th is not the day of the birth of Jesus, just a pagan adjustment which has become accepted, we celebrate not the coming of the new year or departing of the last, instead just because others of our social groups come together and make merry. And the only thing eternal about New years in the hangover I had following the last one!!!
Of course there is a difference between the way an ancient religious man understood New Year (re-creation of the world) and modern men celebrate it. However, there are atheists (probably not you) that understand New Year differently; they make plans for the year to come and try to put a good start to it. This comes from a deep religious need of man to place himself in harmony (sacrality) and escape chaos (profanity).
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
15,456
208
63
I have lost belief in God, I wouldn't lie to you about this. Nor am I deceiving myself. You might say though I am still seeking Jesus, but it is the historical Jesus I search for, the one who I believe has been hidden from our eyes. Jesus for me is a man, not a supernatural being, but God is not something I believe in any longer.
Thank you for your open honesty, and care, No I am not like many claimed Christians that in essence do the below said by:
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
Neely J Hopkins If you need a book written by men thousands of years ago to tell you how to be a good person then you have much bigger problems with yourself than with the basic human rights of others who have nothing to do with you. You want to be a Christian? That's fine, but not everyone does, so you have no right to dictate to others based on your personal beliefs. Maybe you should ask yourself who are you really trying to save?
/QUOTE]

that was a quote I got off face book, after seeing a picture that I don't yet know how to get to here

That says in it, if you are using the Bible to hurt other people, you are using it wrong.
Then the picture shows three people with Bibles over top a person beaten up by them

And underneath it states:
Love does no harm to his neighbor, therefore Love is the fulfillment of the Law

And the quote above is what is quoted after that.
I am not that well versed with computers yet, learning little at a time. Yet anyway
I am not a Bible persecuting thumper, and I do not think the creator that created it all here is either.

But many a people can be and are, unfortunately, and that does not seem to effect you, get you mad and Kudos from me to you on that

And I see God differently as just Love full of Love, Mercy, and there is no more work to be done, so all I do is share this truth
I see the whole Bible as one big bottom line Love Story to all, and not all view that way,
I think they just don't see when they condemn using the word to justify their actions they are in essence the thief

John 10:10
The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.

Stopping one from doing the condemning as that video you liked to all Christians. I saw right then and there you get it, and am elated over it
I guess I have had too many close experiences, to know and understand God is Spirit we do not see, the same as we do not see the air, yet we know it is there.
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
But then the whole speculation ricochets on what you have just stated. How do you know that wives of Noah's sons had any family left? How do you know there had children or babies?...It's could have been like Lot Cycel, God sent angels to tell Lot to leave Sodom, they even asked him to warn his relatives. Lot tried to tell his relatives who evidently ignored him.
Oh, it could have been, though that's not mentioned, however, the only way off was the Ark in this case. The Bible account doesn't mention anyone coming to seek refuge, though apparently the movie Noah shows this; and really, why wouldn't they come. I'd expect it. Maybe one or two of the women had no family, but none of them having family is a stretch. No, they aren't given names and they are not given families, and no one thinks to ask Noah for refuge? I am afraid this account is far from realistic.

Another thing that bothers me is that the Ark was larger than Nelson's flagship Victory which took three years and 250 men to build. How many years would it have taken for Noah and his sons to build the Victory? By my reckoning it would have taken them at least 187 years if they could have done it at all. It is estimated that Victory required about 6000 trees. Did Noah and his sons cut down and dress the lumber of 6000 trees by themselves when he built the Ark, or did he contract out? I imagine British sawmills were more efficient than anything Noah had available. Might it have taken 200 years to build the larger Ark? I guess God was in no hurry to drown the world.

There are other issues with this as well. It seems to me that when people accept the story of the Ark they do the same thing I once did. I accepted the account without thinking. I think that’s generally what people do. It never occurs to anyone to look into the details.
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
Thank you for your open honesty...
And thank you for your easy going nature and your kind words.

homwardbound said:
But many a people can be and are, unfortunately, and that does not seem to effect you, get you mad and Kudos from me to you on that
:) I tell you, my skin has toughened quite a lot since I started visiting forums, and if you look back over all my posts -- too much of a chore for sure -- you will find a few places where I got a little short. I always regret these lapses, but I suppose we all have them from time to time.
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
Atheism is a temporary delusional state which dissipates upon the death of the physical body at which point the atheist's soul enters spiritual dimensions beyond this material universe for judgment, without the benefit of atonement, before God almighty.
The sad thing, it occurs to me, is that if I am right I will never know it, and you will never know you were wrong. :)
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
My apologies if I misread it, but aren't other gods mentioned in the bible? Acts mentions something about him fighting other gods.
William Dever believes there is good reason to think Asherah was once worshiped as Yahweh's consort. See his book, Did God Have a Wife?
 
K

Kerry

Guest
Oh come on I'm not gonna haggle you. Just want to know how you been doing?
 
K

Kerry

Guest
Hey, I am nuisance to many believers on this site. Yeah, I know I talk hard against you and Cycel, but sometimes I have too. But the fact is I enjoy it. Maybe I shouldn't, But I do. I like a good discussion. Sometimes y'all show me up and sometimes I show y'all up. But the battle is fun and I care about you guy's.

Anyway I'm about to sign off. May you be blessed by God.
 
Sep 14, 2013
915
5
0
Hey, I am nuisance to many believers on this site. Yeah, I know I talk hard against you and Cycel, but sometimes I have too. But the fact is I enjoy it. Maybe I shouldn't, But I do. I like a good discussion. Sometimes y'all show me up and sometimes I show y'all up. But the battle is fun and I care about you guy's.

Anyway I'm about to sign off. May you be blessed by God.
Lol I feel exactly the same about you lot! I love the battle too. And yeah, I do say some things I shouldn't myself. But I think your all great.

That's the niceties over!!!
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
No sadness here. I'll answer your post properly when I get some time as I would like to correct this false assertion of yours; however, am busy right now. Peace.

The sad thing, it occurs to me, is that if I am right I will never know it, and you will never know you were wrong. :)
 
S

Spokenpassage

Guest
Oh, it could have been, though that's not mentioned, however, the only way off was the Ark in this case. The Bible account doesn't mention anyone coming to seek refuge, though apparently the movie Noah shows this; and really, why wouldn't they come. I'd expect it. Maybe one or two of the women had no family, but none of them having family is a stretch. No, they aren't given names and they are not given families, and no one thinks to ask Noah for refuge? I am afraid this account is far from realistic.

Well here's an interesting piece that you've just encountered, the women are barely mentioned as well as their families. Lots of religions and mythologies add in names and details about things. In this case, women weren't viewed in the same way as men in this near eastern culture. Jews thousands of years ago kept genealogy, which is also documented history, didn't find it completely adequate for women to be mentioned either. As we see here both have this in common, as well it is considered documented as historical. So from you have just brought up makes it even more real by how Israel kept it within the lines. Reason I say that is for very good reasons (and I know I'm going off track). Jews did not tolerate false witnessed, false documented, or even distorted writings. In the ancient near east when copying the scrolls, if they were to mess up on a jot they would burn it, burn their cloths, bathe, and start all over. This was completely a superstition back then, just as it was to say God's name; they said Adonai in place of YHWH for fear of breaking the third commandment. Nowadays they write G-d in English if you have ever seen that (this is nothing new to you I'm sure lol).

Another thing that bothers me is that the Ark was larger than Nelson's flagship Victory which took three years and 250 men to build. How many years would it have taken for Noah and his sons to build the Victory? By my reckoning it would have taken them at least 187 years if they could have done it at all. It is estimated that Victory required about 6000 trees. Did Noah and his sons cut down and dress the lumber of 6000 trees by themselves when he built the Ark, or did he contract out? I imagine British sawmills were more efficient than anything Noah had available. Might it have taken 200 years to build the larger Ark? I guess God was in no hurry to drown the world.
Funny Cycel, because if this were a made up story we would have said Noah was a professional at making this Ark. Apparently God uses ordinary people for extraordinary purposes (you will find this not uncommon in the bible). Genesis 5:32 tells us Noah was 500 years old and became the father of his three sons, and Genesis 7:6 tells us Noah was 600 when the waters came. This is a hint of how long it must have taken him, a guess is a 100 years cycel. I do believe God used a simple man to build an Ark that survived a flood, in contrast to the titanic built by claimed professionals. Why doubt the power of God?

There are other issues with this as well. It seems to me that when people accept the story of the Ark they do the same thing I once did. I accepted the account without thinking. I think that’s generally what people do. It never occurs to anyone to look into the details.
Well we are at odds, I've come to believe it by thinking as well cycel. It's also amazing how many varieties and similarities of this exact story exists in ancient cultures and modern religions. It's no surprise that this was one of the many stories that were generationally passed down and changed with nations and cultures after Noah's descendants repopulated the earth.
 
S

Spokenpassage

Guest
The sad thing, it occurs to me, is that if I am right I will never know it, and you will never know you were wrong. :)
But Cycel, it's even a more sadder thing if we are right and you were wrong. I do not want you to fall into the coming condemnation. This doesn't seem much to you, especially from a dude over the internet, but it's true. Why would we Christians spend our entire lives believing a myth? Sure many religions do! Why would the apostles suffer martyrdom for a dead man whom they followed and taught? Or the early church for that matter? We do not seek virgins in heaven, or even human passions in glory. I can and will testify cycel, this life is truly awesome.

I wouldn't have told you this if I were lying or even unsure of myself. I'm 18, I wasn't raised in a religious family, apart from teenagers my age in this world, it's a bitter taste to watch them live like it's their only moment in time. What we testify is true. Would you take my word for it? I have experienced many joys in things, material things, knowledgeable things, organized groups and affiliations, but nothing compare to this truth. As a fellow man, and Christian, I respect your view but the question always comes...What if you're wrong on your end. I do not even take joy at that at all...
 
Jan 18, 2014
193
2
0
Well here's an interesting piece that you've just encountered, the women are barely mentioned as well as their families. Lots of religions and mythologies add in names and details about things. In this case, women weren't viewed in the same way as men in this near eastern culture. Jews thousands of years ago kept genealogy, which is also documented history, didn't find it completely adequate for women to be mentioned either. As we see here both have this in common, as well it is considered documented as historical. So from you have just brought up makes it even more real by how Israel kept it within the lines. Reason I say that is for very good reasons (and I know I'm going off track). Jews did not tolerate false witnessed, false documented, or even distorted writings. In the ancient near east when copying the scrolls, if they were to mess up on a jot they would burn it, burn their cloths, bathe, and start all over. This was completely a superstition back then, just as it was to say God's name; they said Adonai in place of YHWH for fear of breaking the third commandment. Nowadays they write G-d in English if you have ever seen that (this is nothing new to you I'm sure lol).



Funny Cycel, because if this were a made up story we would have said Noah was a professional at making this Ark. Apparently God uses ordinary people for extraordinary purposes (you will find this not uncommon in the bible). Genesis 5:32 tells us Noah was 500 years old and became the father of his three sons, and Genesis 7:6 tells us Noah was 600 when the waters came. This is a hint of how long it must have taken him, a guess is a 100 years cycel. I do believe God used a simple man to build an Ark that survived a flood, in contrast to the titanic built by claimed professionals. Why doubt the power of God?



Well we are at odds, I've come to believe it by thinking as well cycel. It's also amazing how many varieties and similarities of this exact story exists in ancient cultures and modern religions. It's no surprise that this was one of the many stories that were generationally passed down and changed with nations and cultures after Noah's descendants repopulated the earth.
But surely the very notion of a man 600 years old is lunacy in itself. If he were not to age, People of that time would have worshipped him as a God or a Demon. If he aged as a natural human. His body would have been too decrepit to life a hammer let alone build an ark. It's a lovely story but there are too many logistical impossibilities for it to be an accurate account of history.

Understanding Genetics
 
S

Spokenpassage

Guest
But surely the very notion of a man 600 years old is lunacy in itself. If he were not to age, People of that time would have worshipped him as a God or a Demon. If he aged as a natural human. His body would have been too decrepit to life a hammer let alone build an ark. It's a lovely story but there are too many logistical impossibilities for it to be an accurate account of history.

Understanding Genetics
Actually no. People before him lived to, at most, 900-near 1000 years of age so this wouldn't be a phenomenon. Matter of fact during Noah's time was the turning event of age limits. The Lord said in Genesis 6:3 that His Spirit will not strive with man forever, also that man's days would be 120 years (max is what I'm supposing). Aren't you surprised that the death age is at average 80 yet so many people live to be well over a hundred. I am not lying, my great great grandmother died at 106 in 2008, she was in a nursing home.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
J

Jda016

Guest
But surely the very notion of a man 600 years old is lunacy in itself. If he were not to age, People of that time would have worshipped him as a God or a Demon. If he aged as a natural human. His body would have been too decrepit to life a hammer let alone build an ark. It's a lovely story but there are too many logistical impossibilities for it to be an accurate account of history.

Understanding Genetics
the entire Bible has many "logistical impossibilities," however Jesus replied, "What is impossible with man is possible with God" (Luke 18:27. He is speaking of the New birth here, but I believe it applies to all things).

You are right. By all human logic, a man living past 600 seems absurd. However, if one has faith in an all-powerful God who is actively involved in human life, then it is easy to accept.

And as God has created all things, He can override or change any governance of laws or science He chooses to.