Maybe the "common" understanding of the resurrections is off
I've been studying for about 30 years - first thing I did as a Christian is go out and buy copies of Adam Clarke’s commentaries (around $300 for the set) . A full volume set of Matthew Henry’s commentaries and have been building my library and studying ever since.
I have studied all the “end time”scenarios - I did lean to a “futurist” view for a long time but with some skepticism.
A few years ago I finally bought J. Dwight Pentecost’s “Things to Come” - supposedly THE text on pre-mill. I haves studied it quite extensivly and found it wanting - one of the MAJOR things he errs on is the identity of the whor.e in the book of revelation - but then his protestant roots and bias show through in his work.
Any theology that does not identify the whor.e as 1st century Israel/Jerusalem is entirely wrong as this places the revelation in a future situation rather than it’s correctly 1st century time slot.
This from Pentecost’s book “Things to Come.” page 368 and he's quoting Scofield here so he's in agreement with what he writes:
Scofield writes:
Two “Babylons” are to be distinguished in the revelation: ecclesiastical Babylon, which is apostate Christendom, headed under the Papacy; and political Babylon, which is the beast's confederated empire, the last form of Gentile world dominion.......
He goes on, needless to say that is all bunk and built on a house of cards - by the way I am not Roman Catholic.
Earlier in the work page 364 he mentions Hislop's book "The Two Babylons" another book I bought 20 odd years ago and read and studied intensely.
I repeat any other identification of the whor.e of the book of revelation as 1st century Israel is bound to be wrong.
I've been studying for about 30 years - first thing I did as a Christian is go out and buy copies of Adam Clarke’s commentaries (around $300 for the set) . A full volume set of Matthew Henry’s commentaries and have been building my library and studying ever since.
I have studied all the “end time”scenarios - I did lean to a “futurist” view for a long time but with some skepticism.
A few years ago I finally bought J. Dwight Pentecost’s “Things to Come” - supposedly THE text on pre-mill. I haves studied it quite extensivly and found it wanting - one of the MAJOR things he errs on is the identity of the whor.e in the book of revelation - but then his protestant roots and bias show through in his work.
Any theology that does not identify the whor.e as 1st century Israel/Jerusalem is entirely wrong as this places the revelation in a future situation rather than it’s correctly 1st century time slot.
This from Pentecost’s book “Things to Come.” page 368 and he's quoting Scofield here so he's in agreement with what he writes:
Scofield writes:
Two “Babylons” are to be distinguished in the revelation: ecclesiastical Babylon, which is apostate Christendom, headed under the Papacy; and political Babylon, which is the beast's confederated empire, the last form of Gentile world dominion.......
He goes on, needless to say that is all bunk and built on a house of cards - by the way I am not Roman Catholic.
Earlier in the work page 364 he mentions Hislop's book "The Two Babylons" another book I bought 20 odd years ago and read and studied intensely.
I repeat any other identification of the whor.e of the book of revelation as 1st century Israel is bound to be wrong.