This could be the last time.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#21
Maybe the "common" understanding of the resurrections is off




I've been studying for about 30 years - first thing I did as a Christian is go out and buy copies of Adam Clarke’s commentaries (around $300 for the set) . A full volume set of Matthew Henry’s commentaries and have been building my library and studying ever since.

I have studied all the “end time”scenarios - I did lean to a “futurist” view for a long time but with some skepticism.

A few years ago I finally bought J. Dwight Pentecost’s “Things to Come” - supposedly THE text on pre-mill. I haves studied it quite extensivly and found it wanting - one of the MAJOR things he errs on is the identity of the whor.e in the book of revelation - but then his protestant roots and bias show through in his work.

Any theology that does not identify the whor.e as 1st century Israel/Jerusalem is entirely wrong as this places the revelation in a future situation rather than it’s correctly 1st century time slot.

This from Pentecost’s book “Things to Come.” page 368 and he's quoting Scofield here so he's in agreement with what he writes:

Scofield writes:

Two “Babylons” are to be distinguished in the revelation: ecclesiastical Babylon, which is apostate Christendom, headed under the Papacy; and political Babylon, which is the beast's confederated empire, the last form of Gentile world dominion.......

He goes on, needless to say that is all bunk and built on a house of cards - by the way I am not Roman Catholic.

Earlier in the work page 364 he mentions Hislop's book "The Two Babylons" another book I bought 20 odd years ago and read and studied intensely.

I repeat any other identification of the whor.e of the book of revelation as 1st century Israel is bound to be wrong.
Brother, this is a nonsense argument because it implies one should trust Revisionists over the actual writers of the Bible.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#22
1John 3:2
[SUP]2 [/SUP]Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears,[SUP][a][/SUP] we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is.
It gets no more clearer than this, this is what the the apostles thought of the return of Christ.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#23
Maybe the "common" understanding of the resurrections is off
really?

John thought when he returned, We will be like him, for we will see him as he is. John fell to the ground when he saw him in his vision, because he could not take it (I do not think he even saw him in all his glory. Scripture says if we saw God as he is, we would die) but here John says we will see him as he is. Thus the men who you claim thought he would return in their lifetime believed we would be resurrected when he comes.


I've been studying for about 30 years - first thing I did as a Christian is go out and buy copies of Adam Clarke’s commentaries (around $300 for the set) . A full volume set of Matthew Henry’s commentaries and have been building my library and studying ever since.

I have studied all the “end time”scenarios - I did lean to a “futurist” view for a long time but with some skepticism.

A few years ago I finally bought J. Dwight Pentecost’s “Things to Come” - supposedly THE text on pre-mill. I haves studied it quite extensivly and found it wanting - one of the MAJOR things he errs on is the identity of the whor.e in the book of revelation - but then his protestant roots and bias show through in his work.

Any theology that does not identify the whor.e as 1st century Israel/Jerusalem is entirely wrong as this places the revelation in a future situation rather than it’s correctly 1st century time slot.

This from Pentecost’s book “Things to Come.” page 368 and he's quoting Scofield here so he's in agreement with what he writes:

Scofield writes:

Two “Babylons” are to be distinguished in the revelation: ecclesiastical Babylon, which is apostate Christendom, headed under the Papacy; and political Babylon, which is the beast's confederated empire, the last form of Gentile world dominion.......

He goes on, needless to say that is all bunk and built on a house of cards - by the way I am not Roman Catholic.

Earlier in the work page 364 he mentions Hislop's book "The Two Babylons" another book I bought 20 odd years ago and read and studied intensely.

I repeat any other identification of the whor.e of the book of revelation as 1st century Israel is bound to be wrong.
I have studied for 30 years also. I have studied the books you have and even more. History and prophesy are my two favorite subjects. So I have more study in this than any other topic.

As for pentecost. I do not agree with everything he said, But he makes alot of great points. the biggest is that you spiritualize prophesy, while pre-milenialists take prophesy literally. And he is correct. this is what separates us.
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#24
really?

John thought when he returned, We will be like him, for we will see him as he is. John fell to the ground when he saw him in his vision, because he could not take it (I do not think he even saw him in all his glory. Scripture says if we saw God as he is, we would die) but here John says we will see him as he is. Thus the men who you claim thought he would return in their lifetime believed we would be resurrected when he comes.




I have studied for 30 years also. I have studied the books you have and even more. History and prophesy are my two favorite subjects. So I have more study in this than any other topic.

As for pentecost. I do not agree with everything he said, But he makes alot of great points. the biggest is that you spiritualize prophesy, while pre-milenialists take prophesy literally. And he is correct. this is what separates us.
Uhhh, now I am going to have to know what a pre-millenialist is. Sigh so much schisms.

Also I see people always saying "spiritualizing" as if this be different than taking the accounts literally. Why is this? Are not the spiritual parts of the Bible literal?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#25
Uhhh, now I am going to have to know what a pre-millenialist is. Sigh so much schisms.

Also I see people always saying "spiritualizing" as if this be different than taking the accounts literally. Why is this? Are not the spiritual parts of the Bible literal?

lol. A pre-mellinialists believes in a future 1000 year literal reign of Christ on earth.

there is also ammilenialism, Then there are post mellinialists, Who believes christ returns after the millennium.

You also have pre-trib, mid trib and post trib.

It can confusing trying to understand and know all the beliefs out there.

Preterism is a term I never heard until last year in this chatroom..
 

Bookends

Senior Member
Aug 28, 2012
4,225
99
48
#26
The Old Testament prophetic word that pairs with above:

Hos_6:2 After two days will he revive us: in the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight.
Sounds like the Lords resurrection to me.
 

Bookends

Senior Member
Aug 28, 2012
4,225
99
48
#27
Uhhh, now I am going to have to know what a pre-millenialist is. Sigh so much schisms.

Also I see people always saying "spiritualizing" as if this be different than taking the accounts literally. Why is this? Are not the spiritual parts of the Bible literal?
Yes, figurative language needs to be take as figurative, Poetic language as poetic, metaphor language as metaphors, sarcastic language as sarcastic, hyperbole language as hyperboles etc. etc. ...

Wow, I'm so hungry I could eat a thousand dogs.
 
L

Larry_Stotle

Guest
#28

lol. A pre-mellinialists believes in a future 1000 year literal reign of Christ on earth.

there is also ammilenialism, Then there are post mellinialists, Who believes christ returns after the millennium.

You also have pre-trib, mid trib and post trib.

It can confusing trying to understand and know all the beliefs out there.

Preterism is a term I never heard until last year in this chatroom..
All those tribs, dibs, and bibs are all based on the wrong identity of the whor.e in the book of revelation - once it is established that the whor.e is 1st century Israel the rest falls into place as for timing and interpretation of the symbols.

The whor.e of Babylon is NOT the Roman Catholic church, is not the EU, is not the World Wide Council of churches and is not some rebuilt "Babylon in Iraq.

The book of revelation and various new testament writings all point to 1st century apostate Israel as the whor.e of Babylon.

Rev 18:4 KJV) And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.


"Come out of her, my people" I believe relates to those that were still trying to keep the old Mosaic Law and not abiding by the doctrine of Christ and the apostles.

Apostate Israel - the persecutor of the saints, the killer of prophets and the Lord Jesus"

(Rev 18:5 KJV) For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.

(Rev 11:8 KJV) And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

Jerusalem is the only place where "our Lord was crucified" - therefore the prophecy is dealing with only that city and apostate Israel that killed him and the prophets.

(1 Th 2:15 KJV) Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

(1 Th 2:16 KJV) Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

(Rev 18:5 KJV) For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.

(Mat 23:31 KJV) Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.

(Mat 23:32 KJV) Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.

All this points to a 1st century "wrath" on Babylon - aka 1st century apostate Israel/Jerusalem.

(Mat 23:37 KJV) O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

(Mat 23:38 KJV) Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

This all came to pass in 70AD.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Rev 17:5 KJV) And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

(Rev 18:21 KJV)...........thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.


(Rev 18:23 KJV)............and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee...

So who is this bridegroom and bride?

Rev 21:9 KJV).................I will show thee the bride, the Lamb's wife...

(Luke 5:35 KJV) But the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken away from them, and then shall they fast in those days.

It is well known that after the death and resurrection of Jesus that the disciples bore witness to the Jesus in the temple in Israel (aka BABYLON) - James was known to have been a constant witness there.

(Acts 5:42 KJV) And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.

This was the voice of of the bridegroom and of the bride that would no longer be found in the temple especially after it's destruction in 70AD if not quite some time before.
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#29
Yes, figurative language needs to be take as figurative, Poetic language as poetic, metaphor language as metaphors, sarcastic language as sarcastic, hyperbole language as hyperboles etc. etc. ...

Wow, I'm so hungry I could eat a thousand dogs.

Lol I get that, but then I suppose we must ask what Spiritual means then

@EG Ahh I think I kinda get what you're saying. Lol I will have to look up the millenialisms sometime to figure out which one makes most sense.

Heh I had actually heard of Preterism years ago and found it intriguing at first, but upon examination of ancient secular history and Bible Prophecy, especially Revelation, I found it to align with neither.
 

ob77

Banned
Mar 8, 2014
273
3
0
#30
Well this could be the last time
This could be the last time
Maybe the last time
I don't know, oh no, oh no

Original lyrics by Hal Lindsey.​


Whoda thunk the futurists are Rolling Stones fans and love singing this tune..

Ok yet another thread on 70AD - but please try and answer the questions posed in the following.

(1 Pet 1:1 KJV) Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,

(1 Pet 1:2 KJV) Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.

Peter is writing to the scattered tribes of Israel and tells them they are in the last time:

(1 Pet 1:5 KJV) Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.

Literally the "last season" - A season does not last 1980 + years or language becomes meaningless.

John affirms the above:

(1 John 2:18 KJV) Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

Literally the "last hour" - a last hour does not last 1980 + years or language becomes meaningless.

Of one thing we can be certain of is the apostolic testimony of the "last time" and of the "end of the age" was spoken of as imminent to the time they lived.

The futurists trying to argue math with the numbers in Daniel and trying to plonk it somewhere in history in any other time than which it belongs consciously ignore language in scripture.

(1 Pet 4:5 KJV) Who shall give account to him that is ready (Greek - etoimws) to judge the quick and the dead.

(1 Pet 4:7 KJV) But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer.

At hand does not mean 1980+ years later or language becomes meaningless.

The interesting things about the above in Peter in regards to ready (Greek - etoimws) with this tense 3 times in the New Testament - in the other two usages it is quite evident that the "ready" means not far off - not 1980 + years later.

(Acts 21:13 KJV) Then Paul answered, What mean ye to weep and to break mine heart? for I am ready (Greek - etoimws) not to be bound only, but also to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.

We all know that Paul being "ready" to die at Jerusalem happened with in his lifetime.

(2 Cor 12:14 KJV) Behold, the third time I am ready (Greek - etoimws) to come to you; and I will not be burdensome to you: for I seek not yours, but you: for the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children.

Again we see the usage of the word - Paul was not thinking of dropping by in a couple of centuries.

(1 Pet 4:17 KJV) For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?

The judgment was at hand, and this does not apply to the judgment that all will undergo upon death it is the white throne judgment that is in view.

The futurists love to use fuzzy math rather than accepting the language of writers of the NT - words like "last time", the end of all things is at hand, "shortly come to pass" all lose their meaning in futurist "theology".


(Rom 13:11 KJV) And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed.

(Rom 13:12 KJV) The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.

Paul is telling them that the day in near for their salvation - at hand does not mean 1980+ years in the future

(1 Th 5:9 KJV) For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ,

Paul is telling the Christians of the 1st century that they would escape the wrath coming on 1st century Jerusalem - history informs us that the early Christian escaped to Pella.

Paul does not say they would not suffer persecution from the enemy but they would escape the wrath:

(Mat 3:7 KJV) But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

There was not much point in John telling these vipers to escape if the wrath has not come some 1980 + years
Instead of going through all that, just read Matthew 24. You will know it when you see it. Other than that, all the other crap is exactly that.....crap.
 

ob77

Banned
Mar 8, 2014
273
3
0
#31
Instead of going through all that, just read Matthew 24. You will know it when you see it. Other than that, all the other crap is exactly that.....crap.
One other thing, no one said WHEN the wrath was to occur, simply that it was coming, and it is, and we will see it.
 

Bookends

Senior Member
Aug 28, 2012
4,225
99
48
#32
The moon turn red and stars fell on the Denver Broncos on the day of the super bowl 2014 when the Seattle Seahawks steamed rolled them.
 

Bookends

Senior Member
Aug 28, 2012
4,225
99
48
#33
Lol I get that, but then I suppose we must ask what Spiritual means then

@EG Ahh I think I kinda get what you're saying. Lol I will have to look up the millenialisms sometime to figure out which one makes most sense.

Heh I had actually heard of Preterism years ago and found it intriguing at first, but upon examination of ancient secular history and Bible Prophecy, especially Revelation, I found it to align with neither.
Quite odd isn't, I found Preterism to be the best fit with both prophecy and History. Strange how we come to two different conclusions.
 
L

Larry_Stotle

Guest
#34
@EG Ahh I think I kinda get what you're saying. Lol I will have to look up the millenialisms sometime to figure out which one makes most sense.

Heh I had actually heard of Preterism years ago and found it intriguing at first, but upon examination of ancient secular history and Bible Prophecy, especially Revelation, I found it to align with neither.
I've got shelves stacked with books from Hal Lindsey, Grant Jeffery, et. al. and others - they are all futurists - and while I would not say they don't have their merits and truly believe in what they write the only view that actually does justice to the time imminent statements littered through the NT and the revelation is preterism - I did not come to this conclusion overnight as I spent most of my years with the other 'isms.
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,543
17,020
113
69
Tennessee
#35
Well this could be the last time
This could be the last time
Maybe the last time
I don't know, oh no, oh no

Original lyrics by Hal Lindsey.​


Whoda thunk the futurists are Rolling Stones fans and love singing this tune..

Ok yet another thread on 70AD - but please try and answer the questions posed in the following.

(1 Pet 1:1 KJV) Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,

(1 Pet 1:2 KJV) Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.

Peter is writing to the scattered tribes of Israel and tells them they are in the last time:

(1 Pet 1:5 KJV) Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.

Literally the "last season" - A season does not last 1980 + years or language becomes meaningless.

John affirms the above:

(1 John 2:18 KJV) Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

Literally the "last hour" - a last hour does not last 1980 + years or language becomes meaningless.

Of one thing we can be certain of is the apostolic testimony of the "last time" and of the "end of the age" was spoken of as imminent to the time they lived.

The futurists trying to argue math with the numbers in Daniel and trying to plonk it somewhere in history in any other time than which it belongs consciously ignore language in scripture.

(1 Pet 4:5 KJV) Who shall give account to him that is ready (Greek - etoimws) to judge the quick and the dead.

(1 Pet 4:7 KJV) But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer.

At hand does not mean 1980+ years later or language becomes meaningless.

The interesting things about the above in Peter in regards to ready (Greek - etoimws) with this tense 3 times in the New Testament - in the other two usages it is quite evident that the "ready" means not far off - not 1980 + years later.

(Acts 21:13 KJV) Then Paul answered, What mean ye to weep and to break mine heart? for I am ready (Greek - etoimws) not to be bound only, but also to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.

We all know that Paul being "ready" to die at Jerusalem happened with in his lifetime.

(2 Cor 12:14 KJV) Behold, the third time I am ready (Greek - etoimws) to come to you; and I will not be burdensome to you: for I seek not yours, but you: for the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children.

Again we see the usage of the word - Paul was not thinking of dropping by in a couple of centuries.

(1 Pet 4:17 KJV) For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?

The judgment was at hand, and this does not apply to the judgment that all will undergo upon death it is the white throne judgment that is in view.

The futurists love to use fuzzy math rather than accepting the language of writers of the NT - words like "last time", the end of all things is at hand, "shortly come to pass" all lose their meaning in futurist "theology".


(Rom 13:11 KJV) And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed.

(Rom 13:12 KJV) The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.

Paul is telling them that the day in near for their salvation - at hand does not mean 1980+ years in the future

(1 Th 5:9 KJV) For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ,

Paul is telling the Christians of the 1st century that they would escape the wrath coming on 1st century Jerusalem - history informs us that the early Christian escaped to Pella.

Paul does not say they would not suffer persecution from the enemy but they would escape the wrath:

(Mat 3:7 KJV) But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?

There was not much point in John telling these vipers to escape if the wrath has not come some 1980 + years
What did you just say?
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,543
17,020
113
69
Tennessee
#36
All those tribs, dibs, and bibs are all based on the wrong identity of the whor.e in the book of revelation - once it is established that the whor.e is 1st century Israel the rest falls into place as for timing and interpretation of the symbols.

The whor.e of Babylon is NOT the Roman Catholic church, is not the EU, is not the World Wide Council of churches and is not some rebuilt "Babylon in Iraq.

The book of revelation and various new testament writings all point to 1st century apostate Israel as the whor.e of Babylon.

Rev 18:4 KJV) And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.


"Come out of her, my people" I believe relates to those that were still trying to keep the old Mosaic Law and not abiding by the doctrine of Christ and the apostles.

Apostate Israel - the persecutor of the saints, the killer of prophets and the Lord Jesus"

(Rev 18:5 KJV) For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.

(Rev 11:8 KJV) And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

Jerusalem is the only place where "our Lord was crucified" - therefore the prophecy is dealing with only that city and apostate Israel that killed him and the prophets.

(1 Th 2:15 KJV) Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

(1 Th 2:16 KJV) Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

(Rev 18:5 KJV) For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.

(Mat 23:31 KJV) Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.

(Mat 23:32 KJV) Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.

All this points to a 1st century "wrath" on Babylon - aka 1st century apostate Israel/Jerusalem.

(Mat 23:37 KJV) O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

(Mat 23:38 KJV) Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

This all came to pass in 70AD.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Rev 17:5 KJV) And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

(Rev 18:21 KJV)...........thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.


(Rev 18:23 KJV)............and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee...

So who is this bridegroom and bride?

Rev 21:9 KJV).................I will show thee the bride, the Lamb's wife...

(Luke 5:35 KJV) But the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken away from them, and then shall they fast in those days.

It is well known that after the death and resurrection of Jesus that the disciples bore witness to the Jesus in the temple in Israel (aka BABYLON) - James was known to have been a constant witness there.

(Acts 5:42 KJV) And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.

This was the voice of of the bridegroom and of the bride that would no longer be found in the temple especially after it's destruction in 70AD if not quite some time before.
Oh yeah. Now I get it...
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,570
9,090
113
#38
Of course he returned in 70AD - there is no justification for splitting his address to the disciples into the 40 year period and extraploatiiong parts into the future - doing so is based on presuppositional bias.



Read up on Josephus' Wars of the Jews - it speaks of all of what Jesus said would come in the next 40 years

(Mat 24:29 KJV) Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:

(Mat 24:30 KJV) And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

(Mat 16:28 KJV) Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

(Mat 26:63 KJV) But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God.

(Mat 26:64 KJV) Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall YE see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.

In the above we have two statements from Christ claiming that some would not taste of death and that the high priest and those with him would see his coming.

The problem with futurists “theology” is that it cannot accept that 1st century apostate Israel/Jerusalem is the whor.e in the book of revelation - until it does so the “theology” will be wrong - but that is not the thread topic .

Yes I'm sure the entire 1st century earth inhabitants could only buy and sell with a mark they received on their hand. according to you that happened already right?

I am in awe that there are some Christians that believe this nonsense.
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#39
I've got shelves stacked with books from Hal Lindsey, Grant Jeffery, et. al. and others - they are all futurists - and while I would not say they don't have their merits and truly believe in what they write the only view that actually does justice to the time imminent statements littered through the NT and the revelation is preterism - I did not come to this conclusion overnight as I spent most of my years with the other 'isms.
Lol never heard of those guys so they are as irrelevant as the Preterist Revisionists. Basically you saying that you read Preterist Revisionists and Futurist Revisionists is like me saying I read Brave New World and 1984 and then arguing Huxley was correct over Orwell when in fact all evidence is against both of them lol.

And I certainly did not come to my conclusion overnight either. Nor do I pretend to know every detail of how Revelation will happen, though I do know this is a future event. Though how far into the future? That we shall see, though Jesus cometh quickly.

70 AD Jerusalem isn't the only possible fulfillment of the Whore of Babylon by the way. For Jerusalem still stands and the house of Israel have regained the Promised Land in our time. Thus this prophecy is wide open to still be fulfilled, though I do believe some signs do come before the destruction of the Whore.

Plus you know the whole fact Jerusalem still stands today and the prophecy of the whore says she will be totally destroyed also cancels out the 70 AD Theory.
 
L

Larry_Stotle

Guest
#40
Lol never heard of those guys so they are as irrelevant as the Preterist Revisionists. Basically you saying that you read Preterist Revisionists and Futurist Revisionists is like me saying I read Brave New World and 1984 and then arguing Huxley was correct over Orwell when in fact all evidence is against both of them lol.
Poor comparison.

70 AD Jerusalem isn't the only possible fulfillment of the Whore of Babylon by the way. For Jerusalem still stands and the house of Israel have regained the Promised Land in our time. Thus this prophecy is wide open to still be fulfilled, though I do believe some signs do come before the destruction of the Whore.
Name another that can be considered to be the killer of the OT saints - Jesus laid the guilt and the punishment right at the generation who heard him feet.

(Luke 11:51 KJV) From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.

The above can only be applied to the first century AD

Plus you know the whole fact Jerusalem still stands today and the prophecy of the whore says she will be totally destroyed also cancels out the 70 AD Theory.
(Mark 13:2 KJV) And Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these great buildings? there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

Sure it "stands" - but to claim it will once again be a "religious" center is totally against the intent of scripture.

God does not dwell in temples made with hands - there is never going to be another Jerusalem "centered" temple in Israel - it's a total denial of what the church Christ built is.

The REAL Jerusalem is heavenly not earthy:

(Eph 2:20 KJV) And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;

(Rev 21:14 KJV) And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.


(1 Pet 2:5 KJV) Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.

(Rev 21:19 KJV) And the foundations of the wall of the city were garnished with all manner of precious stones. The first foundation was jasper; the second, sapphire; the third, a chalcedony; the fourth, an emerald;


(Heb 12:22 KJV) But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,

How is it possible that the believers in the 1st century were able to come to mount zion and the heavenly Jerusalem if John's vision is in the future?