Look carefully at what is said in the following verses:
Matthew 24:
[SUP]21[/SUP] For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
Mark 13:
[SUP]19[/SUP] For in those days shall be affliction, such as was not from the beginning of the creation which God created unto this time, neither shall be.
Daniel 12:
[SUP]1[/SUP] And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
Notice that, in Daniel 12:1, there is no mention of an 'after'.
Why is there not a "nor ever shall be" / "neither shall be" in Daniel 12:1 ?
"Think about it..."
Matthew 24:
[SUP]21[/SUP] For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
Mark 13:
[SUP]19[/SUP] For in those days shall be affliction, such as was not from the beginning of the creation which God created unto this time, neither shall be.
Daniel 12:
[SUP]1[/SUP] And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
Notice that, in Daniel 12:1, there is no mention of an 'after'.
Why is there not a "nor ever shall be" / "neither shall be" in Daniel 12:1 ?
"Think about it..."
Daniel is discussing a "NATION." The nation is obviously Israel. Was Daniel referring to events of AD 67-73 or a future event? Did Michael stand up and were "thy people delivered" back in AD 67-73? The answer seems obvious. NO!!
Christ, however, does not specifically mention "a nation." Rather Christ discusses a great tribulation or affliction the likes the world has never seen, nor will ever see again. This has a feel of "global" in scope rather than regional or limited to a nation. If so, it clearly begins when the Abomination of Desolation appears in "the Holy Place" which we all know is in Israel whether it's a future temple, Temple Mount or Jerusalem.
So, could Daniel and Christ be describing the same period? Is it possible that the Nation of Israel will face a worse hardship to come than what they endured in AD 67-73 and at the same time, can the world, or perhaps Christian world, be enduring the same devastating hardship? I don't see why not especially given that the Muslim world clearly hates Israel and all Christians.
The thrust of your point, Gary, seems to be Christ was talking about a period which is not at the end where Daniel was talking about a period at the end. Maybe, maybe not. What if the period is the same and there is a peaceful millennium to follow? Would it make sense that Israel will not endure any worse hardship as it does before Christ returns and that this period is also marked by Christian persecution but then after the Millennium when Satan is loosed there will again be Christian testing and persecution where many will fall but it won't be as bad as it will be prior to Christ's return. Although we know Jerusalem will be surrounded at the end again we also know God intervenes and destroys those who encircle the Saints. Does this idea not sound consistent with both accounts?