Re: Since Acts 2:38 teaches that the baptism commanded is "for the remission of sins,
What have I said since the beginning? Did I not say that baptism is the FIRST STEP AND ACT OF FAITH and then when we step out and act in FAITH, God then acts and does when we response IN FAITH?
So you admit that FAITH in Christ is "already established prior to stepping out and performing an act of faith," a work that follows faith? All good works are an act of faith, but not faith itself. Did Paul say in Ephesians 2:8 that we have been saved by stepping out and performing an act of faith, a work, or through FAITH? There is a difference.
It is the shed WATER of Jesus that cleanses us. It is by faith we receive it, and we received in baptism.
The literal shed water of Jesus? Do you believe this water has saving properties in it's chemistry and we literally contact it in the waters of baptism? I've heard people who attend the church of Christ say that we contact the shed blood of Christ in baptism, but I have not heard them say we contact the shed water. Do you attend the church of Christ? So what do you do with these verses in Scripture that connect LIVING WATER with everlasting life? John 4:10,14; 7:37-38.
Yet you leave OUT places such as Acts 2 and Acts that SAYS otherwise.
On the surface, they only "appear" to say otherwise. Scripture must harmonize with Scripture.
[SUP]38 [/SUP]Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. [SUP]39 [/SUP]The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”
In Acts 2:38, "for the remission of sins" does not refer back to both clauses, "you all repent" and "each one of you be baptized," but refers only to the first. Peter is saying "repent unto the remission of your sins," the same as in Acts 3:19. The clause "each one of you be baptized" is parenthetical.
Acts 3:19 -
Repent therefore and
be converted, that your
sins may be blotted out, so that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord. *What happened to baptism?
Acts 10:43 - To Him all the prophets witness that, through His name, whoever
believes in Him will receive remission of sins. 44 While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. 45 And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because
the gift of the Holy Spirit (compare with Acts 2:38 -
the gift of the Holy Spirit) had been poured out on the Gentiles also. 46 For they heard them
speak with tongues and magnify God. 47 Then Peter answered,
"Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?" *What happened to baptism in verse 43?
Acts 11:17 - If therefore God gave them the
same gift as He gave us
when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ, (PRIOR TO WATER BAPTISM) who was I that I could withstand God?" When they heard these things they became silent; and they glorified God, saying, "Then God has also granted to the Gentiles
repentance unto life. *What happened to baptism?
Acts 15:8 - So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them by
giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, 9 and made
no distinction between us and them,
purifying their hearts by faith. *What happened to baptism?
Faith in Jesus Christ "implied in genuine repentance" (rather than water baptism) brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38; 3:19; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 16:31). *Perfect Harmony*
Acts 22
[SUP]14 [/SUP]“Then he said: ‘The God of our ancestors has chosen you to know his will and to see the Righteous One and to hear words from his mouth. [SUP]15 [/SUP]You will be his witness to all people of what you have seen and heard. [SUP]16 [/SUP]And now what are you waiting for? Get up, be baptized and wash your sins away, calling on his name.’
The Greek aorist participle, epikalesamenos, translated "calling on His name" refers either to action that is simultaneous with or before that of the main verb, "be baptized." Here Paul’s calling on Christ’s name for salvation preceded his water baptism. The participle may be translated "having called on His name" which makes more sense, as it would clearly indicate the order of the events. Kenneth Wuest picks up on this Greek nuance and translates the verse as follows: "And now, why are you delaying? Having arisen, be baptized and wash away your sins, having previously called upon His Name" (Acts 22:16, Wuest's Expanded NT). As Greek scholar AT Robertson points out -
baptism is the picture of death, burial and resurrection, so here baptism pictures the change that had already taken place when Paul surrendered to Jesus on the way. Baptism here pictures the washing away of sins by the blood of Christ. Our sins are already washed away by the blood of Christ and we are saved when we repent/believe/call upon the name of the Lord (Acts 3:19; Acts 10:43; Romans 3:24-26; 10:13) BEFORE water baptism. Paul tells that he did not receive or hear the Gospel from Ananias, but rather he heard it directly from Christ. Galatians 1:11-12 says, "For I would have you know, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man. For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ." It also should be noted that Paul at the time when Ananias prayed for him to receive his sight, he was
filled with the Holy Spirit (Acts 9:17)--this was
before he was baptized (Acts 9:18). Verse 17 connects his being filled with the Spirit with the receiving of his sight. We know that he received his sight
prior to his water baptism. It is also interesting that when Paul recounted this event again later in Acts (Acts 26:12-18), he did not mention Ananias or what Ananias said to him at all. Verse 18 again would confirm the idea that Paul received Christ as Savior prior to receiving water baptism since here Christ is telling Paul he will be a messenger for Him concerning forgiveness of sins for Gentiles as they have faith in Him. It would seem unlikely that Christ would commission Paul if Paul had not yet believed in Him and was not saved.
*No single text of scripture is to be interpreted out of context, and this includes the entirety of scripture. No scripture is to be interpretated in isololation from the totality of scripture. Practically speaking, a singular and obscure verse is to be subservient to multiple and clear verses, and not vice versa.