If the rules of the site are to not promote anything ungodly, why do we allow people who divorce and re-marry (while their ex spouse is still alive) to continue to fellowship on here while justifying the sin of adultery? If that issue were dealt with on the same level as homosexuality, nearly half of straight heterosexual married couples in the church would be condemned to hell if they don't change their ways, reconcile with their true spouses or separate and remain single.
Instead most are silent and plead the grace of Christ -- because otherwise they come face to face with a personal sin from which they have no escape if they wish to remain in a committed relationship with their current spouse. No escape because they made a bad choice the first time around, committed sin the first time around, were abused the first time around, yet "chose" to re-marry someone new out of personal desire, forgiveness, or Christian goals with a more compatible partner.
If one can find an exception clause (not always the case in every divorce), it is clearly only meant to protect the victim of unfaithfulness, and not the perpetrator should that person later repent and return to Christ, only to find their ex-spouse has moved on and married someone else. How is adultery any different from homosexuality in this context? The one we come face to face with every day in our churches, with fellow believers?
Maybe that's a good place to start in learning how to deal with homosexual sinners in love. Because while sexual immorality is clearly a major sin, one that Jesus commanded to "go and sin no more," no such command was given for minor sins. The ones of the mind and heart that we struggle with every day as a result of our fallen condition. If we were truly able to go and sin no more from every sin tendency that affects as us humans, we would be perfect and never sin again. Which is not possible as long as we are in this earthly body. We strive for perfection in Christ, but fall short daily.
I say this because there seems to be a disproportionate response on this topic compared to other sins a Christian commits -- in spite of still being saved. The Bible is clear that only the Father can draw a sinner to repentance (John 6:44), and that each will be brought "in his own order" (1 Corinthians 15:23). If it is not time for that person to come to the fullness of Christ, no amount of preaching or persuasion will convert them. I don't see that truth proclaimed as much in the arguments here. Instead I see immediate condemnation without much thought to how the present may in fact be leading to a future reconciliation.