I want to understand the Catholic faith so....

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
There's a huge difference between calling out crappy beliefs and attacking people of that belief. Or even assuming everyone in that belief believes what they're being told they believe. Notice I didn't include everything that was said. Much that was said was going after the beliefs. That's good. But attacking the people who believe it? Not good! Here, Misc, or in BJ's Wholesale Club at 24th and Oregon.

Basic tenet of most, if not all, networking sites. Should be a given for Christian sites. Should be a given for Christians.
I've made my self pretty clear i try not to attack the person personally when attacking the doctrine.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
So it's alright for YOU to viciously tear into PROTESTANT doctrine,
but if someone tears into YOUR doctrine...
they are "without ethics."


And... YOU want to play the victim now?

Seriously?

Seriously?


You come here just to argue, and create contention... and now you're the victim?

That's convenient.
When did she "tear into the Protestant doctrine?"

I saw her telling why she doesn't bother explaining things to protestants. And for convenience sake, many of us gave wonderful examples of what she was talking about right on this thread. She isn't a victim, nor is she claiming to be one. (I don't know her well, but one thing you can't call her is a victim. lol) She is certainly being targeted by a mob mentality though.

She'd like to actually discuss stuff, but, instead of discussing, she's been attacked and, sometimes, attacked for who she isn't. (I've seen her use scripture. She even used it again in the post you're rallying again. You're claiming she's done stuff she hasn't done.)

RobOp tells in his PM's that some folks are saved on here. Truly a miracle because often our stance is to attack those who don't believe what we believe. (I am as guilty as the next guy.)

What would you do if you were her? She is "spiritual." She's willing to talk. And yet, YES! She is being attacked. SHE is, not just her church is.

She's listened. We haven't! She's been trying to follow the God of the Bible as far back as she remembers, yet she doesn't know if she is born again. Yeesh! This is an open invitation to truly talk to her, and yet what is everyone doing? Attacking her! Attacking her church!

So let's gag on perception and forget the obvious! Same thing we did to ZZ. Last I heard, it wasn't the church/denomination that saves, but dang if we aren't pushing that one anyway.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
You honestly believe you're the only person on the forum who knows what "rhetoric" means?

You honestly think you can just spout some words, and it magically makes all your other words change or disappear?

Unbelievable.

You should run for office.

No really, you should be a politician.

The plural possessive pronoun "our" is often used in a condescending way to mean "your".

We do this all the time.
Everyone on this forum has heard an adult tell some children,
"Alright, now lets put our mittens on."
And the adult had no mittens.

You know perfectly well "our" is often a condescending way to say "your", and it's contingent on context.

That's the most irritating thing.
You act as if everyone outside of yourself must surely be such an idiot they'll believe any ridiculous thing you say.

If I took you seriously, I'd be insulted.
Well, you honestly thought you could peg her down in one thread, so 1-1 score at best.
 
Jun 23, 2015
1,990
37
0
Whoa, whoa whoa! I fully agree with you on your post with the mixed up, freaky doctrine they have, so how do you see me criticizing you on that?

Let me run down the list of "loving" things people have said about Catholics on this psot only:
-- They are getting special supernatural plagues particularly for them.
-- They are spiritual adulterers.
-- They're heretics.
-- They call Mary the Mother of Humanity and the queen of heaven.
-- They call someone other than God Father.
-- The pope tells them to despite Jesus's explicit instructions.
-- They're what's in a garbage can.
-- The deification of Mary is a fact.
-- They judge us!
-- They don't feed starving parishioners.
-- They call us names and haters.
-- They're a cult.
-- They've murdered millions and millions.
-- They never use the Bible to support these little accusations.
-- Take the boulder off your shoulder and you don't make it to heaven by people being nice to you. take the boulder off your shoulder for a moment, toss it aside and start over. As a CHRISTIAN, you do not make it to heaven by demanding people be 'nice' to you. You make it to heaven by being nice to your enemies, blessing them that curse and persecute you, etc. God is NOT going to take you aside and ask "DID you get on the internet recently and make sure those people knew how you were treated? There, there, my child...let your Father rap his arms around you and comfort you...I will take care of those chatroom members who did not associate with you, once and for all!". There are no pity parties given here. (People stuck up for tourist, but treated the Catholics they don't know like this anyway.)
-- doctrine and scripture is perverted.
-- The RC is the Antichrist.
-- There is fiction in your head. (Followed quickly by Good-bye and God bless.)
--
you never quote the Bible, and don't seem to hold it in high regard. (Said to someone who has quoted and seems to have regard for it.)
--
Respectfully:
I asked you if it agrees with what the bible says? Just give me a succinct answer! Is that possible with you or do you always need to answer in your
self-aggrandizing, bloviated manner in which you respond to everyone! Im quite tired of your vain babblings. You impress noone but yourself.
Just answer the question!! YES OR NO!

--
I thought you were leaving? (Said more than once, and always followed by a blessing once they were sure he really left.)
--
Your ignorance is not just sad, its blasphemous. You, fordman, worship the Catholic church. You're doomed, and there ain't nothing Mary, the pope or your works can do about it. Did, dot, dash, adios, blasphemer. Make no mistake, you've been warned.
--
did Jesus use a Rosemary? Nope. Did Jesus go to a confessional? Nope. He prayed to God directly finding a quiet place to pray. Did Jesus follow around a 'pope' like figure? Nope. He told everyone to be disciples:

--
don't be conceded and pompous' because you are in our home, ChristianChat. Not the other way around.

First, some of this is just crap. Some of it is true, but the manner it is said is wrong. Second, it's all to target and none of it is love (or respect.) Third, and most important, how long would you put up with people tearing your beliefs this hard and actually listen to them? The Catholics were targeted by a moc. No one was out to bring them to the truth. Want to save someone? Be nice. Be understanding. Don't taunt.

And you said:

-- My guess is that Blain will get sucked in.
Experiential faith is a strong pull along with the mystical element.
-- How about each of those the Roman Catholic Church burned at the stake?
Does the true Church burn people at the stake?
-- So you would like to join those who tortured and burned the saints (if you don't already belong)?
-- have been slippin, slippin into darkness and are becoming a setup for an ecumenical type beast...
-- no that won't do. Countries kill, murder, and do bloody battles: Churches don't...or are at least not supposed to.
-- Ecumenical slop
-- ecumenical mish mash
-- ecumenical lovefest
As I said before, you weren't the worse. But even my Catholic brothers who don't even believe in God or don't think he gets involved with people would have punched you over this junk. There was no love.

So, who's fault is it these people aren't saved? Isn't there a time to truly reach a person? Ford proved he won't here but ZZ and Mary would, if they could hear something past the anger and taunts.

You know this wasn't right. Very much like a mobbing.
Ill add one. Your pontificating rant is nothing more than the pot calling the kettle black! I suppose you must keep up with your unbelievable 36 posts a day regimen somehow. blab blab blab blab blab blab blab...
oh Im sorry, that was too much truth wasnt it?

You have some nerve woman.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
I really get bothered by the us and them mentality that if we aren't of the Right Religion....please someone tell me exactly which one, (religion), that is so I'll know o.k.?
Presbyterian and reformed. (Gives you a choice of religions, but hey, they're the "right ones.")

LOL Just kidding!
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
I've made my self pretty clear i try not to attack the person personally when attacking the doctrine.
Try harder?

I am.

(Ooo ooo, does this land us right back into "if you're trying, you aren't getting grace?" lol)

The whole idea is not to back someone into a corner, because that just makes us defensive. When defensive, we don't listen. And, in this case, the offense should listen back, even if they hear the strawman. It's not a debate. They're real people.

Leave backing into a corner for debates. There's a big difference between debating the lesser points and how we treat people before we know if they're saved. You and I can go strong with each other because we trust the other is saved. BUT look what we've done to two people on this thread through the same tactics. (I honestly believe Fordman isn't listening, so treat him as a debate. I might be wrong.)
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
Was that a joke? I have only been asking a valid (scriptural)question and have yet to get a clear answer!
When you figure out what "respectfully" and "valid" mean, maybe you'd get answers.
Respectfully:
I asked you if it agrees with what the bible says? Just give me a succinct answer! Is that possible with you or do you always need to answer in your
self-aggrandizing, bloviated manner in which you respond to everyone! Im quite tired of your vain babblings. You impress noone but yourself.
Just answer the question!! YES OR NO!


Is this how we are saved ( REBORN of the spirit)according to the BIBLE?

2 Timothy 2:16 “But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.”
 
Jun 23, 2015
1,990
37
0
When you figure out what "respectfully" and "valid" mean, maybe you'd get answers.
Haha. Im sorry but I have a difficult time taking anything you say seriously!! You tend to rattle on and on and on. Do us all a favor and go play with your teddy bears more often! I thought you had me on ignore. Please do me a favor and continue.

Blessings
 
Last edited:
Feb 26, 2015
737
7
0
Romans 8:16-17
[SUP]16 [/SUP] The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God,
[SUP]17 [/SUP] and if children, heirs also, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with Him in order that we may also be glorified with Him.

Ephesians 2:8-9
[SUP]8 [/SUP] For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;
[SUP]9 [/SUP] not as a result of works, that no one should boast.

The ONLY "right" religion is the one where we are Children of God. The only "right" religion are those who have accepted Jesus and have received Salvation by Faith and Grace.

All those who teach Salvation is received by Works is not the "right" religion. All those who teach other gods before us like Mary are not of the "right" religion.
 
Jun 23, 2015
1,990
37
0
My question still goes unanswered!! Is it wrong for me to point out to a person who claims to understand salvation but yet the comment on her profile that she was "baptized as a baby and it took", is a contradiction ?
We are not saved by baby baptism. So I am left thinking that one of two things is going on here

: Poetmary understands my point based on scripture and yet is unwilling to admit her flawed thinking OR she still doesnt understand.

Which is it ?

I merely want an answer. Im sure I am not the only one who is perplexed with her contradictory stance .
 
Feb 26, 2015
737
7
0
Tell me PoetMary, do you believe Mary was born without sin?

Romans 3:10
[SUP]10 [/SUP] as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one;
Romans 3:23
[SUP]23 [/SUP] for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,

Romans 5:12
[SUP]12 [/SUP] Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned




Tell me PoetMary, do you believe Mary is a mediator?

1 Timothy 2:5
[SUP]5 [/SUP] For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus

What did you mean in your answer that you have the Indwelling of the Holy Spirit by " through prayer, scripture, fellowship with believers, the sacraments, and right living"?


What Sacraments gives you the Indwelling of the Holy Spirit? And which "right living" gives you the Indwelling of the Holy Spirit?

Ephesians 1:13
[SUP]13 [/SUP] In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
Try harder?

I am.

(Ooo ooo, does this land us right back into "if you're trying, you aren't getting grace?" lol)

The whole idea is not to back someone into a corner, because that just makes us defensive. When defensive, we don't listen. And, in this case, the offense should listen back, even if they hear the strawman. It's not a debate. They're real people.

Leave backing into a corner for debates. There's a big difference between debating the lesser points and how we treat people before we know if they're saved. You and I can go strong with each other because we trust the other is saved. BUT look what we've done to two people on this thread through the same tactics. (I honestly believe Fordman isn't listening, so treat him as a debate. I might be wrong.)
I have my style you have yours. When people leave, they leave on their own accord and do not need mothering to stay. Am I to carry guilt feelings with everyone that leaves a battle zone?
I have always suggested that CC set up a "safe zone" where seekers and new believers can go to ask their sincere questions and the ones who would get booted would be their attackers...until then if I sense someone is, young, weak, or sincerely searching I do my best to be gentle, but when they turn and their agenda becomes apparent then the gloves come off.
 
Jun 23, 2015
1,990
37
0
I have my style you have yours. When people leave, they leave on their own accord and do not need mothering to stay. Am I to carry guilt feelings with everyone that leaves a battle zone?
I have always suggested that CC set up a "safe zone" where seekers and new believers can go to ask their sincere questions and the ones who would get booted would be their attackers...until then if I sense someone is, young, weak, or sincerely searching I do my best to be gentle, but when they turn and their agenda becomes apparent then the gloves come off.
Did Jesus deal with the humble at heart differently than the hardened of heart? Yes!
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,727
3,661
113
This place is a mess.
So? ok, bring on the perfect Church....zzzz
I think another RC'er earlier beat you to the punch and made the same comment :)
Us imperfect ones tend to be messy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.