Bishop Fulton Sheen is renown as a flaming apostate.To agree with her misconceptions of the Catholic faith is your right, but it stil doesn't make them correct.
“There are not one hundred people in the United States who hate The Catholic Church, but there are millions who hate what they wrongly perceive the Catholic Church to be.”
― Fulton J. Sheen
Bishop Fulton Sheen is renown as a flaming apostate.
I could care less for the Romanist church but I do care for the lost souls in that church organization. They do not dare preach correct soteriology.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
In your opinion what is an acceptable church or denomination? Are there any lost souls in these church organizations as well?
I would think there are probably lost souls in ALL denominations and church organizations.. JMO
No argument from me. All denominations are filled with souls that need Jesus Christ including all the independent bible churches around the world.In your opinion what is an acceptable church or denomination? Are there any lost souls in these church organizations as well?
I put up an answer to this thread before, and reading through now I am overcome with indignation.
Mary is dead. She is not in heaven! No where in scripture does it say this! She is not a deity she is not able to answer prayer she is not part of the Godhead AT ALL! Scripter says
John 3:13
No one has ascended to heaven but He who came down from heaven, that is, the Son of Man who is in heaven.
There is a flaw within the RCC and it was conceived even before it's foundation around 400AD. People do not want to let go! To be with Christ and in His Church we have to let go and let Jesus do it, within us. This is how grace works, there is nothing we can do except accepting what He has done by dying on the Cross, this is the 'gospel' the Good news, and afterwards we still do not have to do anything, certainly nothing that is "ordained" by man. Yes there is baptism but the acceptance comes first or what would there be except a bath and we all have those (hopefully), and this baptism was ordained by Jesus himself (as for Cornelius and his household they had to accept Jesus before being baptised and they were).
As for the rest of it 'the doctrine of the communion of the saints' etc where is this scriptural? We are saints are we not? Paul wrote "To the saints at Ephesus" meaning the congregation not special individuals who had been canonised, what is canonised? We are told by God DO NOT ADD TO HIS WORD! and NOT TO TAKE ANYTHING AWAY!
Jesus said through John when he wrote revelation that He hated the deeds of the Nicolations, Hated is such a strong word and the Spirit convicts within us when things like this come up and they are pointed out, like now, and there is always a reaction,good or bad. The deeds on the Nicolations compromises the Word of God, it waters it down, it takes from what is not of God and makes it simulate what is. When Constantine said 'everyone become Christian' there was a relief among the brethren that they were not going to be thrown to the lions or persecuted any more and everyone (Christians) thought that they would be safe now. But the temples that abounded in the Roman world which were given over to Christianity became the focus, the priests which held power within the population were not giving in without a fight, and take counsel they might from Christians around them they did not give up seats of power, and being forced to become a Christian did not mean becoming one. It meant a true representation of the faith was not being told those who needed to know it, because those who were doing the telling did not know it them selves.
There is in scripture mention of the 'secrets of the Kingdom', it also says that these secrets, now Jesus was risen and ascended were made known, these secrets were the things written about Christ within the old testament which were by what Christ did fulfilled so all could understand. The RCC took this and turned it upside down using Latin to hide the truth from the people, the Word only to be written in Latin, the words of God only spoken in Latin, the rituals of the pagan temples kept (because they controlled the people) and incorporated within the Latin texts.
The end of all this which people do not seem to see is that from being killed for their faith, Christians suddenly started killing for their faith. The deeds of the Nicolations incorporated within the New church the teachings of the old pagan religions which is why we have saints days, Christmas, Easter, purgatory, and last but not least a wealthy church that feeds itself while its parishioners starve.
As for miracles done in saints names, is not Satan known as an 'angel of light'? While those miracles done in Jesus name will not be manifest within the world because that is not what they are for, they edify the Church not Man or woman.
I am going to stop now because my blood is boiling and I wish to remain a member of CC. If this specific post is answered please use scriptural references, the KJV or NTV even the GN translations. lets keep this real.
You must be in some kind of cult that denies life after death. God is a God of the living, not the dead.I put up an answer to this thread before, and reading through now I am overcome with indignation.
Mary is dead. She is not in heaven! No where in scripture does it say this! She is not a deity she is not able to answer prayer she is not part of the Godhead AT ALL! Scripter says
No one claims that Mary came down from heaven, that's a stupid assumption, which proves your profound ignorance and abuse of scripture. Because no one came from and ascended into heaven the way Jesus did. John 6:35,41,48,51 - Jesus says four times "I AM the bread from heaven." It is He, Himself, the eternal bread from heaven. But your Docetic heresy has reduced His Bread to a symbol.John 3:13
No one has ascended to heaven but He who came down from heaven, that is, the Son of Man who is in heaven.
Nonsense. You can't find any scholarly source, such as an encyclopedia or history book, to support this ridiculous charge. It's fundie propaganda and nothing more. Do you reject the Council of Ephesus of 451 AD which defended the Incarnation against heresy? Do you accept the heresies of Nestorius? You see, you don't know who that is, because your steady diet of anti-Catholic bigotry won't allow you to learn or think for yourself.There is a flaw within the RCC and it was conceived even before it's foundation around 400AD
Now you are sounding like a Catholic. If Catholicism is wrong, so are you, since 90% of your doctrines are borrowed from the Catholic Church.People do not want to let go! To be with Christ and in His Church we have to let go and let Jesus do it, within us. This is how grace works, there is nothing we can do except accepting what He has done by dying on the Cross, this is the 'gospel' the Good news, and afterwards we still do not have to do anything, certainly nothing that is "ordained" by man. Yes there is baptism but the acceptance comes first or what would there be except a bath and we all have those (hopefully), and this baptism was ordained by Jesus himself (as for Cornelius and his household they had to accept Jesus before being baptised and they were).
It's been posted several times. If you are not interested in finding out what the doctrine really means, (because you haven't got a clue) then you are in no position to be making infallible declarations on the subject.As for the rest of it 'the doctrine of the communion of the saints' etc where is this scriptural? We are saints are we not? Paul wrote "To the saints at Ephesus" meaning the congregation not special individuals who had been canonised, what is canonised? We are told by God DO NOT ADD TO HIS WORD! and NOT TO TAKE ANYTHING AWAY!
Do you think the Catholic Church ever accepted the evils of Nicholataus? Where is your proof?Jesus said through John when he wrote revelation that He hated the deeds of the Nicolations, Hated is such a strong word and the Spirit convicts within us when things like this come up and they are pointed out, like now, and there is always a reaction,good or bad. The deeds on the Nicolations compromises the Word of God, it waters it down, it takes from what is not of God and makes it simulate what is.
This makes no sense. Priests serve, they do not hold power. That is an anti-Catholic myth. You probably deny the Church had anything to do with the final compilation of the Holy Books of the bible in 397 AD because to admit it means you would have to change your big boogie man theory.When Constantine said 'everyone become Christian' there was a relief among the brethren that they were not going to be thrown to the lions or persecuted any more and everyone (Christians) thought that they would be safe now. But the temples that abounded in the Roman world which were given over to Christianity became the focus, the priests which held power within the population were not giving in without a fight, and take counsel they might from Christians around them they did not give up seats of power, and being forced to become a Christian did not mean becoming one. It meant a true representation of the faith was not being told those who needed to know it, because those who were doing the telling did not know it them selves.
You have no scholarly documentation to support this lie. The Bible was translated into Latin in the 4th century because anyone who could read knew Latin. It was a universal language and still is. St. Jerome chose Latin so MORE people could read it, not everyone could read the original Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic manuscripts. Doctors will often write prescriptions in LATIN so any pharmacist anywhere in the world can read it. Look in a botony or zoology book, the names are all in Latin. It's a universal language. Your anti-Catholic paranoia is based on ignorance.There is in scripture mention of the 'secrets of the Kingdom', it also says that these secrets, now Jesus was risen and ascended were made known, these secrets were the things written about Christ within the old testament which were by what Christ did fulfilled so all could understand. The RCC took this and turned it upside down using Latin to hide the truth from the people, the Word only to be written in Latin, the words of God only spoken in Latin, the rituals of the pagan temples kept (because they controlled the people) and incorporated within the Latin texts.
Where do you get this insanity?The end of all this which people do not seem to see is that from being killed for their faith, Christians suddenly started killing for their faith. The deeds of the Nicolations incorporated within the New church the teachings of the old pagan religions which is why we have saints days, Christmas, Easter, purgatory, and last but not least a wealthy church that feeds itself while its parishioners starve.
How can Satan cast out Satan? A kingdom divided against itself cannot stand. Do you need scripture references for that? Here we are, 2000 years later and still standing as one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church. And when was your church founded? What about Protestant faith healers? Are they Satanists?As for miracles done in saints names, is not Satan known as an 'angel of light'? While those miracles done in Jesus name will not be manifest within the world because that is not what they are for, they edify the Church not Man or woman.
I am going to stop now because my blood is boiling and I wish to remain a member of CC. If this specific post is answered please use scriptural references, the KJV or NTV even the GN translations. lets keep this real.
Other mediators does not mean equal mediators. If you, a subordinate mediator, prays for someone who needs it, does that make Jesus's death on the cross unnecessary? The principle is the same, the family of God on earth is one with the family of God in heaven. If you choose to live in a broken home, that's up to you.If there are other mediators between us and God then wouldn't that make Jesus's death on the cross unnecessary?
That's a brainless insult. Make an intelligent inquirery and do some reading on the subject beforehand. I don't relish in making anyone look stupid, so if you want to have a discussion with me, read the above links first. If you continue in this amoral, sinful persecution of Catholics, you will go on my ignore list.Catholicism summarized. ... let's completely ignore the Bible and just make up our own doctrine.
"Why would any true Christian show "respect" to a religion that is leading billions of people to hell, Ford?
It's the same as showing respect to Satanism, or Buddhism, Hinduism, Mormonism, or any other religion that is damning souls!
Would you kiss the Satanic Bible, Ford? How about the Book of Mormon? Would you kiss the Koran?
Will Muslims make it to heaven, Ford? How about Buddhists, Hindus, Satanists, Mormons, etc.?"
From August 2015 - and you've been ducking answering it ever since.
Show us fordman where in the Scriptures did Jesus ever say Mary is the mother of all men?
I just found another question:fordman 1. Where the "The Sinners Prayer"[FONT=Arial said:is located in Scripture?[/FONT]
2. Where "
Infant Dedications" (in lieu of Infant Baptism) is located in Scripture?
3. Where Denying infants Baptism is located in Scripture?
4. Where the objection to"dancing and alcohol" is located in Scripture?
5. Where the Protestant practice of the "The Altar Call"is located in Scriprure? (do you even have an altar in your church?)
6. Where the serving of "grape juice" for communion rather than wine is located in Scripture?
7. Where it say's in the Bible that "Scripture interprets Scripture?"
I'll stop at these seven to let you catch up, but have many more Protestant/non-Catholic traditions (small t) I'd like you to show where they are located in Scripture, Okay?
Pax Christi
Fundamentalists are sometimes horrified when the Virgin Mary is referred to as the Mother of God. However, their reaction often rests upon a misapprehension of not only what this particular title of Mary signifies but also who Jesus was, and what their own theological forebears, the Protestant Reformers, had to say regarding this doctrine.
A woman is a man’s mother either if she carried him in her womb or if she was the woman contributing half of his genetic matter or both. Mary was the mother of Jesus in both of these senses; because she not only carried Jesus in her womb but also supplied all of the genetic matter for his human body, since it was through her—not Joseph—that Jesus "was descended from David according to the flesh" (Rom. 1:3).
Since Mary is Jesus’ mother, it must be concluded that she is also the Mother of God: If Mary is the mother of Jesus, and if Jesus is God, then Mary is the Mother of God. There is no way out of this logical syllogism, the valid form of which has been recognized by classical logicians since before the time of Christ.
Although Mary is the Mother of God, she is not his mother in the sense that she is older than God or the source of her Son’s divinity, for she is neither. Rather, we say that she is the Mother of God in the sense that she carried in her womb a divine person—Jesus Christ, God "in the flesh" (2 John 7, cf. John 1:14)—and in the sense that she contributed the genetic matter to the human form God took in Jesus Christ.
To avoid this conclusion, Fundamentalists often assert that Mary did not carry God in her womb, but only carried Christ’s human nature. This assertion reinvents a heresy from the fifth century known as Nestorianism, which runs aground on the fact that a mother does not merely carry the human nature of her child in her womb. Rather, she carries the person of her child. Women do not give birth to human natures; they give birth to persons. Mary thus carried and gave birth to the person of Jesus Christ, and the person she gave birth to was God.
The Nestorian claim that Mary did not give birth to the unified person of Jesus Christ attempts to separate Christ’s human nature from his divine nature, creating two separate and distinctpersons—one divine and one human—united in a loose affiliation. It is therefore a Christological heresy, which even the Protestant Reformers recognized. Both Martin Luther and John Calvin insisted on Mary’s divine maternity. In fact, it even appears that Nestorius himself may not have believed the heresy named after him. Further, the "Nestorian" church has now signed a joint declaration on Christology with the Catholic Church and recognizes Mary’s divine maternity, just as other Christians do.
Since denying that Mary is God’s mother implies doubt about Jesus’ divinity, it is clear why Christians (until recent times) have been unanimous in proclaiming Mary as Mother of God.
The Church Fathers, of course, agreed, and the following passages witness to their lively recognition of the sacred truth and great gift of divine maternity that was bestowed upon Mary, the humble handmaid of the Lord.
Irenaeus
"The Virgin Mary, being obedient to his word, received from an angel the glad tidings that she would bear God" (Against Heresies, 5:19:1 [A.D. 189]).
Hippolytus
"[T]o all generations they [the prophets] have pictured forth the grandest subjects for contemplation and for action. Thus, too, they preached of the advent of God in the flesh to the world, his advent by the spotless and God-bearing (theotokos) Mary in the way of birth and growth, and the manner of his life and conversation with men, and his manifestation by baptism, and the new birth that was to be to all men, and the regeneration by the laver [of baptism]" (Discourse on the End of the World 1 [A.D. 217]). Catholic Answers
I just found another question:
Why did the practice (prayers to the saints) develop in the first place among Christians of the first generation, or (in a more skeptical view) in the second generation, right around John’s death? Is this yet another instance of the “train” of the early Church de-railing before it even got up any speed into the journey through Church history, over the rails of God’s Providence (forgive the clumsy analogy!)? Why, if this practice is wrong and un-apostolic, do we find no protest among the early Christians and Fathers against it?
Well KenAllen, then you are calling your Protestant Reformers liers!Mary was the mother of the body that Jesus used to walk on the Earth.
God has no mother! God is Eternal with no beginning or end.