If the Titanic Were Sinking Today, Who Should Have First Access to the Lifeboats?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

In an Emergency Situation, People Should be Saved in This Order:

  • 1. Children; 2. Women; 3. Men. (For all votes, please state your thoughts as to why in your post.)

    Votes: 10 43.5%
  • 1. Children; 2. Men; 3. Women

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1. Children; 2. Women OR Men (each gender should have an equal right to be saved.)

    Votes: 4 17.4%
  • 1. Women; 2. Children; 3. Men.

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • 1. Men OR Women (equal rights); 2. Children.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other--I have another opinion I would like to share in my post.

    Votes: 10 43.5%

  • Total voters
    23

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,075
13,601
113
#41
Who should have first access? The people closest to the lifeboats. Provided that there are enough, and that there aren't passengers prevented from access as there were in the 1997 movie. Of course, the crew should help the passengers, and not simply jump in first. After that, I think it is up to each passenger to decide for themselves whether to go or to leave place for another. Again referencing the '97 movie and the real tragedy, no place in a lifeboat should go unused.

Yes, the selfish and self-important will be saved... temporarily. But there is judgment coming, and no lifeboats out of that.
 

Born_Again

Senior Member
Nov 15, 2014
1,585
129
63
#42
We're all gonna drown, but I got a helmet. :D
 

violakat

Senior Member
Apr 23, 2014
1,236
21
38
#43
In general, I would say children first, especially the youngest, as they would have a less likely chance of surviving. And then 2nd would be what adult who would not survive, such as a paraplegic/quadriplegic, someone who is on crutches or missing an a limb, etc. Then either or.
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#44
I'm 6'3'' 200+ lbs. im getting on a boat whether you like it or not
 

AsifinPassing

Senior Member
Jul 13, 2010
3,608
40
48
#45
Leo should get first seat in the lifeboats. I really felt like he was greatly mistreated.

 
N

NukePooch

Guest
#46
Well, it should be women, children, and the disabled first.

But, in today's society?





 
Sep 6, 2013
4,430
117
63
#47
Leo should get first seat in the lifeboats. I really felt like he was greatly mistreated.


It's not like they didn't have two hours to construct their own boat out of doors, life preservers and bed sheets.


(Talking about Jack and Rose here... I'm sure the actual passengers didn't realize they wouldn't have a place in the boats until too late. So senseless and tragic.)
 

Roh_Chris

Senior Member
Jun 15, 2014
4,728
58
48
#48
"Did you say there is place on the lifeboat for me?"

"Hold on for a minute, I have to update my FB status and tweet about this." :p
 
W

wwjd_kilden

Guest
#49
the thing is, what messed up the Titanic even was failure of planning / organization / leadership, . If a ship has enough lifeboats, good routines and people do as told, it shouldn't matter who goes first because all should get a place in a boat
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,058
3,373
113
#50
the thing is, what messed up the Titanic even was failure of planning / organization / leadership, . If a ship has enough lifeboats, good routines and people do as told, it shouldn't matter who goes first because all should get a place in a boat

This was a major problem with the Titanic.....lifeboats for less than half the occupants. It's builders and designers were so certain that they had build a ship that was unsinkable that they felt the extra lifeboats would clutter the deck too much.
 

Roh_Chris

Senior Member
Jun 15, 2014
4,728
58
48
#51

This was a major problem with the Titanic.....lifeboats for less than half the occupants. It's builders and designers were so certain that they had build a ship that was unsinkable that they felt the extra lifeboats would clutter the deck too much.
And add to the ship's deadweight tonnage.
 
S

Stone5524

Guest
#52
For best results I would fill them first with air
 
H

HonestlyHumbled

Guest
#54
1. Women and Children
2. Men

Why?
Because men are physically stronger than women and children. The children need to be cared for.
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,058
3,373
113
#55
I'm fairly sure they WERE already filled with air before the Titanic even left on it's voyage.. :confused:
Modern ships predominantly us self inflating rubber life rafts since they take up very little space prior to being inflated. In the days of the Titanic life boats were basically over sized wood row boats.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,599
6,801
113
#56
The Order of this is well established in Naval Law is it not?

Women and children, Elderly, Injured, Sick [all these being equal], Men, Crew, Captain as I recall..........could be wrong
 

seoulsearch

OutWrite Trouble
May 23, 2009
16,245
5,212
113
#57
The Order of this is well established in Naval Law is it not?

Women and children, Elderly, Injured, Sick [all these being equal], Men, Crew, Captain as I recall..........could be wrong
The heart and feeling behind this thread isn't actually about the Titanic at all, but rather, how men are valued--or undervalued--in our society.

The Titanic happened to be a very striking example, which is why the title is centered around it, but the actual issue doesn't have anything to do with the Titanic or Naval Law.

I don't always succeed but I almost always write threads in a way that the original post must be read in order to fully understand the meaning of the thread's title.

(I'm glad you posted this though, as I find this law to be interesting... and have wondered how it came to be established in the first place.)
 

zeroturbulence

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2009
24,641
4,300
113
#58
On the Costa Concordia, the captain was one of the first ones on a lifeboat...

concordia-processo-800x533.jpg
 
C

crosstweed

Guest
#59
I once read the biography of a man by the name of Rev. John Harper.

It was a short but powerful book ("the Titanic's Last Hero", or something to that effect). I wept like a baby and prayed God would make me that sacrificial in spirit. I just now looked him up on the Titanic's passenger list. The web page doesn't have a lot of information about him personally, but the biography I read consisted of some of his own words, eulogies and letters written about him after his death, and what happened that night on the Titanic, and what he did, according to passengers who survived, including his niece and his little daughter. He without hesitation put her and his niece on the life boat and remained on the ship - knowing he was sending his child away an orphan (her mother had died a few years prior in childbirth). So what did this deeply devoted Christian man who was totally sold out for God have to say about who should be on the life boats?

"Get the women, children, and the unsaved into the lifeboats!"
He could have made use of the opportunity to get on the lifeboat... after all, who was going to take care of his child? But instead, those who were were picked up later by rescue ship said that he gave away his life jacket to someone who wasn't saved... and spent his last minutes pleading with people to accept Christ.

I think the unsaved and the children should be the first ones on the life boats. And I'm not sexist, but I think the women should be next after them, and here's why: men are supposed to protect and provide for women. That is the role that God has given him. If I were a man, I would take the same position. There's an unselfishness about it that is nonexistent in cultures that haven't been touched by Christ. I mean, can you visualize a ship full of Muslims going down and them putting the women and kids on the boat first? Their oldest sons, maybe... "Sorry Fatima... You've always been my favorite, but..."

It's one thing if a woman volunteers to stay in order that someone else can go, but for some reason, any other arrangement feels... cowardly.

I'd rather have my last testimony be ====> this. <====== God help us all.
 

garet82

Senior Member
Jan 20, 2011
679
85
28
#60
Myself. Coz i cant swim. Last time i just got back from other island n hd to use ship to got back. Even i only be there for three hours i got unconfortable with the ship. It was night n i walked outside to got fresh air, i saw all dark. I remembered titanic ship n it made me unconfortable thingking if the ship accidently sunk n i became fish food lol
Silly me :D lol