Just so you know brethren, what John146 is hiding about the theory of Hyper-Dispensationalism which he is preaching here...
They basically only recognize Apostle Paul's Epistles as being for Christ's Church, with the rest of The Bible meant only for Israel. That is simply just another deeper level of men's doctrines with its main purpose to support the false pre-trib rapture theory which Darby also preached in 1830's Great Britain, having gotten the idea from the Edward Irving church and twistings on Margaret McDonald's Scripture mumblings when she was in bed sick.
Although a pre-trib rapture theory can be disproved even in Apostle Paul's Epistles, they still seek to narrow any direct statements against it, like with our Lord Jesus telling His disciples upon the Mount of Olives in Matt.24 and Mark 13 about the day of His return and gathering of His Church AFTER... the tribulation. "Oh, that's only meant for Jews," they will say. "We only need to heed what Apostle Paul taught," they will say.
Well... not only Hyper-Dispensationalists, but most traditional Dispensationalists also refuse our Lord Jesus' revealing there in His Olivet Discourse about His coming to gather His Church after... the "great tribulation" He forewarned us about. All the pre-trib rapture traditions refuse to recognize that Matt.24:29-31 and Mark 13:24-27 Scripture being for Christ's Church. And that is just ONE example of many Scripture outside Paul's Epistles they refuse to recognize involving Christ's Church.
But then they will... use what Apostle John said in John 14 about Christ preparing the "many mansions" being for the Church, showing us how they are hypocrites seeking gain (filthy lucre). American Indians would call that speaking with a "forked tongue". They aren't serious about what God's Word says, they instead are serious about creating for themselves positions of authority over other brethren, and great publishing houses like they wanted their Berean Bible Society thingy to evolve to, putting money in their pockets! (see history of that involving C.R. Stam, et al).
Thus I have added yet another to my Ignore List...
They basically only recognize Apostle Paul's Epistles as being for Christ's Church, with the rest of The Bible meant only for Israel. That is simply just another deeper level of men's doctrines with its main purpose to support the false pre-trib rapture theory which Darby also preached in 1830's Great Britain, having gotten the idea from the Edward Irving church and twistings on Margaret McDonald's Scripture mumblings when she was in bed sick.
Although a pre-trib rapture theory can be disproved even in Apostle Paul's Epistles, they still seek to narrow any direct statements against it, like with our Lord Jesus telling His disciples upon the Mount of Olives in Matt.24 and Mark 13 about the day of His return and gathering of His Church AFTER... the tribulation. "Oh, that's only meant for Jews," they will say. "We only need to heed what Apostle Paul taught," they will say.
Well... not only Hyper-Dispensationalists, but most traditional Dispensationalists also refuse our Lord Jesus' revealing there in His Olivet Discourse about His coming to gather His Church after... the "great tribulation" He forewarned us about. All the pre-trib rapture traditions refuse to recognize that Matt.24:29-31 and Mark 13:24-27 Scripture being for Christ's Church. And that is just ONE example of many Scripture outside Paul's Epistles they refuse to recognize involving Christ's Church.
But then they will... use what Apostle John said in John 14 about Christ preparing the "many mansions" being for the Church, showing us how they are hypocrites seeking gain (filthy lucre). American Indians would call that speaking with a "forked tongue". They aren't serious about what God's Word says, they instead are serious about creating for themselves positions of authority over other brethren, and great publishing houses like they wanted their Berean Bible Society thingy to evolve to, putting money in their pockets! (see history of that involving C.R. Stam, et al).
Thus I have added yet another to my Ignore List...
But your ad hominem against Darby by using Irving and McDonald is unproven.
Sticking to Scriptural proof of what you actually believe rather than only attacking the stance of another will give you more mileage...but it may also open your view to attacks as well, but at least you will be more credible.