There it is again. Everyone knows? I don't even know that. It is what you imagine, only, but proclaim as truth.Everyone knows you hate me, ...
There it is again. Everyone knows? I don't even know that. It is what you imagine, only, but proclaim as truth.Everyone knows you hate me, ...
Why do you falsely accuse me of getting mad when I explain that I had linked to another thread?
WHat, am I supposed to lie?
do you and PW think you are really going to affect me by attacking me? I can not read what he says, But the fact he got mad at me for somethign I did not do. and was unwilling to admit it when he was called out on it, he has lost any respect he could have had.
I neither yelled nor got mad. Why do you continue to lie about others the way you do?So you get mad at me because I did not know it was a link.
Then yell at me, And I tried to explain I did not know it was a link. and it is all on me??
Please ignore me..
[/B]
I think the important thing to remember here is that Christ has already won.
Many have claimed it is slander to say those who call people who believe in obedience and righteousness as legalists, do not themselves support obedience and righteousness.
The real question is, are we talking about the same thing? The answer is no because they reject the principles and morality we would want to obey and call righteousness.
So the question is obedience to what in their eyes?
Take the sermon on the mount. They say that is addressed to Jews and not christians.
The Lords prayer, old covenant. In fact everything before the cross is irrelevant.
Righteousness? Well nothing in the law, because that is just for Jews or to convict of failure.
Now there is much in the letters of the apostles but it does not relate to penal or civil govenance, rather personal attitudes and emotional responses. But everything that refers back to Jews or Jewish attitudes is also excluded. So you will hear the words context, but that just means ignore or apply this area to your life depending on the audience.So though these people appear to have the same language as us, they actually approve of a different moral and relationship model.
It is why the language can be the same but the actual implications different.
Not surprisingly this is actually a different faith but with a similar language. Now they argue it is the true faith and what we have practised for 2000 years is actually false legalism and self justification.Now they will strut and preen and say they are being loving to the weak believer and condemning the pharisee for their legalism and hypocracy. Now this appears on the surface a legitimate position until you realise it is they who continually confess about sin and failure, about being bound and never able to be free from issues. The bestthey do is repress ones conscience, say the Holy Spirit never convicts of sin, and say walking in the Spirit is the goal, but [they],continually walk in the flesh which they feel guilty about.
The whole premise is you can never walk in fellowship before the Lord in purity and righteousness, even redeemed washed and purified. So though they claim they are freeing themselves from condemnation, they actually believe they deserve it. {Please Note: FIVE slanderous accusations in one sentence!}
Their response is the christian is called to be perfect which is impossible. The problem is "perfect" is in the eyes of the beholder. To say righteous, blameless, walking in love and the Holy Spirit, the apostles say this should be our position and should be our experience. If this is not possible, why did Jesus die on the cross, why are we called the body of Christ, holy, redeemed, a glory to the King of Kings.
Now I talk as I do, because I believe your heart can be cleaned, your emotions can respond on the inside the same as the outside, you can be really alive, rejoicing, knowing you are a child of heaven and Christ has done a new work in you.
They do not hold to this, thoughthey talk of grace, it is grace to a flawed and failed people who actually stay like that except of occasional miraculous healings. Anything else is of the flesh.
Take the sermon on the mount. They say that is addressed to Jews and not christians.
The Lords prayer, old covenant. In fact everything before the cross is irrelevant.
I believe we should not follow Jesus Christ, because I don't feel like it
I believe it is Jesus that not only saves us, but guides and leads us under the direction of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is the one who convicts us of sin, and when I am walking with my eyes fixed on Jesus, he will always lead me into all truth.
"And when he comes, he will convict the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment:" John 16:8
"When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come." John 16:13
Well EG ... twice today you slandered me ... I posted a quote & nothing else ... then twice you said I meant this or that by it when I had not said one word.
Do I get an apology?
I wonder how often you accuse others of slandering you but refuse to own up to your own.I think I said this last week.
This thread needs to be closed. It has lost all semblance of respectability. (considerring this thread was started as a slander against me, I think I have the right to ask that it be closed)
so you are telling me you did not post that verse to prove one can lose salvation?
Why else would you post it?
Not everyone is interested in resolution.Someone is going to have to pass this message to EG, since EG has chosen to place me on his ignore list.
How will you ever resolve anything if you simply place everyone you disagree with on your ignore list?
Not everyone is interested in resolution.
Some just want to be right all the time.
I want to be both, but know it is not always possible, and am willing to admit when I am wrong.This is quite true. As for myself, I would rather be happy than right.
then why would ANYONE fear losing salvation.
Are we not saved by Gods PERFECT LOVE??
what is it that makes this so hard to believe?
Someone is going to have to pass this message to EG, since EG has chosen to place me on his ignore list.
How will you ever resolve anything if you simply place everyone you disagree with on your ignore list?
That's right - I did not.