Women Pastors? Help me.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
H

HisHolly

Guest
People use Corinth letter to justify part of this claim but in the OT I gave an example that contradicts.. It's doesn't apply BC some don't want women speaking, or to have a prominent role.. its lack of truth.. I gave the Luke 2:36-39 as a NT example..
 
H

HisHolly

Guest
New covenant has nada to do with position in authority.. Christ didn't say I'm here to change who is where.. body is as designed..
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
People use Corinth letter to justify part of this claim but in the OT I gave an example that contradicts.. It's doesn't apply BC some don't want women speaking, or to have a prominent role.. its lack of truth.. I gave the Luke 2:36-39 as a NT example..
Scripture cannot contradict scripture. How shall we reconcile your perceived contradiction?

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

jerry2465

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
160
10
18
Luke 2:36-39 is in the OT?
no but Deborah the judge is from the old testament. There is a very clear order to things described in the NT which overrides the OT order on several things.
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,075
1,701
113
How so? The scriptures I've seen discussed are about women not having authority over men?
Because Debra was not a member of Christ's church.... ?

She lived in a previous era, under a completely different covenant. Nothing that happened under the old covenant establishes a precedent for what is under the new covenant.... hence the "new" part of the new covenant...

sorry if this sounds abrupt, I have to rush off to a dental appointment :eek: and don't have time to elaborate....
 
S

StanJ

Guest
again.... where is the scriptural reference to a local assembly that had only ONE elder/pastor/overseer....
The scriptures I have read that reference this always mention elders (plural)
Titus 1:7-9
Acts 20:28
1 Peter 2:25
 
S

StanJ

Guest
Because Debra was not a member of Christ's church.... ?
She lived in a previous era, under a completely different covenant. Nothing that happened under the old covenant establishes a precedent for what is under the new covenant.... hence the "new" part of the new covenant...
She was a member of the congregation of Israel which was the church. the office might have been different but it was still an office of authority and teaching. The New Covenant meant that the law was done away with so that God could have a personal relationship with each one of us it did not mean that the principles he had formed in the Old Testament where to be done away with. New means exactly that and new way of doing things which did not include subjugating woman even more!
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Perhaps one could say that Debra influenced authority because of her proximity to it rather than say she exerted authority in place of the king.

Scripture is trying to teach that a woman should not be the head of a local assembly of believers. Women certainly have a ministry in the local assembly but not as it's head. Jesus did not make Mary, His mother, to be head of the disciples but gave her into the care of one whom He trusted.

God does have a natural order of things. It is always troublesome when man goes around Gods order to establish his own.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
S

StanJ

Guest
Hornetguy, If you are trying to say that the example of a church in the NT did not have one person over the assembly but rather a group of elders...then you are correct. Paul ordained elders in every church he established. People use Timothy as an example of a single pastor being over the church, however that is not really an example of a pastor being over a church because Timothy was the personal representative for Paul. Paul was imprisoned and he knew that Timothy would do exactly what he would do, so he personally placed Timothy in that position. It is apparent that James was a prominent person in the Jerusalem church, however they had elders and when they chose the 7 deacons the entire church had an impute.
The overseer by that very name is the one that oversees the local church. There is never more than one Overseer in a local church. Whether that translates today to a superintendent of a denomination it's something else to discuss but any organization including the church has levels of authority which does not mean only Jesus as the head.
 
S

StanJ

Guest
from what I can see diakonos can have a few meanings, so technically all translations are probably accurate (I know I'm not qualified to teach a translator how to do his job). The word can mean "minister" or it can mean "servant" or it can simply mean a "runner" , someone who would do general tasks in the church, which to me fits scripture exactly. In my understanding (incomplete understanding, because I'm not God) I see the use of diakonos in Romans 16 as a "worker" in the church (Phoebe in this case) and probably someone who is a helper to Paul, helping him with general tasks in the church.

1249 diákonos (from 1223 /diá, "thoroughly" and konis, "dust") – properly, "thoroughly raise up dust by moving in a hurry, and so to minister" (WP, 1, 162); ministry (sacred service).
1249 /diákonos ("ministry") in the NT usually refers to the Lord inspiring His servants to carry out His plan for His people – i.e. as His "minister" (like a deacon serving Him in a local church).
[A. T. Robertson, "1249 (diákonos) properly means 'to kick up dust,' as one running an errand." 1249 (diákonos) is the root of the English terms, "diaconate, deacon."
This root (diakon-) is "probably connected with the verb diōkō, 'to hasten after, pursue' (perhaps originally said of a runner)" (Vine, Unger, White, NT, 147).]
Just because a word does have several connotations does not mean you get to pick and choose which connotation you accept. That is done by the people who Translate the Greek or Hebrew into English because they have the credentials and the wherewithal to understand the context. Anybody who has been studying the Bible for a good amount of time will understand the context used here and realize it is not problematic. Anybody who understands proper biblical hermeneutics doesn't argue about this issue. Only those who are prejudiced against women for whatever reason have a problem with this issue.
 
S

StanJ

Guest
Stan, context is what defines something, the man who called Phoebe a servant also said that a woman could not have authority over a man in the church. So when you put both those scriptures together we should be able to discern that Paul meant that Phoebe was actually a "servant" and not someone who had authority over men in the church.
That is not factual. Paul did not say that women couldn't have authority over men in the church, Paul said a woman, meaning wife, could not have authority over a man, meaning her husband.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
Subjugating woman is not a biblical teaching. God has a government designed for at home and another when different families gather together in a assembly. Because of the new reformed order that has to do with women covering their glory, the hair, along with the covering she must be silent.

The only glory is the unseen glory,( by faith.) We walk by faith and not by sight .She is saved from not being able to teach a male through, childbirth.

If God say woman should be quiet in an assembly atmosphere or cover their hair, as a ceremonial law. Why would someone refuse to do the work rather than receiving the blessing by obeying what it says?.

Even the prophetess Deborah acting as a judge would not go unless the king, a male went along.
 

jerry2465

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
160
10
18
I am definitely not prejudiced against women at all, maybe with that way of thinking God is prejudice in your mind because he says through the inspired writers:

Ephesians 5:22-24 ESV
[SUP]22 [/SUP]Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. [SUP]23 [/SUP]For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. [SUP]24 [/SUP]Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands.

and:

genesis 3:16 ESV



[SUP]16 [/SUP]To the woman he said,
“I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing;
in pain you shall bring forth children.
Your desire shall be contrary to[SUP][a][/SUP] your husband, but he shall rule over you.

And of course the verses that have been posted so many times on this thread, saying that women should remain silent in the assembly.

Its not about being prejudice, its simply what God says very simple and very plain. As I have said throughout this thread, I believe women are just as capable and just as intelligent and just as able in every way as a man, but its simply not the way that God has said he wants it to be. Or even if the verses don't mean what they say, I still plan to obey and not risk the consequences of challenging God, saying he really didn't mean what those verses says.
 

jerry2465

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
160
10
18
Just because a word does have several connotations does not mean you get to pick and choose which connotation you accept. That is done by the people who Translate the Greek or Hebrew into English because they have the credentials and the wherewithal to understand the context. Anybody who has been studying the Bible for a good amount of time will understand the context used here and realize it is not problematic. Anybody who understands proper biblical hermeneutics doesn't argue about this issue. Only those who are prejudiced against women for whatever reason have a problem with this issue.
if a word has more than one connotation, then you pick the one that fits scripture as a whole. If there seems to be a contradiction then I think a person can use the meaning that would eliminate said contradiction.
 
S

StanJ

Guest
By misrepresenting scripture in that a woman cannot have authority over a man in any circumstances is subjugating women, whether you want to admit it or not. By continuing to mix the two scriptures into one issue shows a deliberate attempt to obfuscate the truth. It is not God's will to be a domineering woman in the household and take spiritual leadership and it is also not God's will that man are domineering in the church and take a domineering role by trying to subjugate women into silence. Obviously women cannot be silent in church if they exercise the gifts of tongues or prophecy, which Paul said to forbid not.
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,075
1,701
113
Titus 1:7-9
Acts 20:28
1 Peter 2:25
hmmm... you skipped Titus 1:5, which says
[SUP]5 [/SUP]For this reason I left you in Crete, that you would set in order what remains and appoint elders in every city as I directed you
and Acts.... speaks of overseers... again, plural... even though it was really talking about how the apostles, as a group, are all overseers/shepherds... and it's talking about Christ's church at large... not individual assemblies.
[SUP]25 [/SUP]“And now, behold, I know that all of you, among whom I went about preaching the kingdom, will no longer see my face. [SUP]26 [/SUP]Therefore, I [SUP][o][/SUP]testify to you this day that I am [SUP][p][/SUP]innocent of the blood of all men. [SUP]27 [/SUP]For I did not shrink from declaring to you the whole purpose of God. [SUP]28 [/SUP]Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you [SUP][q][/SUP]overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He [SUP][r][/SUP]purchased [SUP][s][/SUP]with His own blood.
and 1 Peter? it's talking about our one overseer/shepherd.... Jesus...
[SUP]24 [/SUP]and He Himself [SUP][x][/SUP]bore our sins in His body on the [SUP][y][/SUP]cross, so that we might die to [SUP][z][/SUP]sin and live to righteousness; for by His [SUP][aa][/SUP]wounds you were healed. [SUP]25 [/SUP]For you were continually straying like sheep, but now you have returned to the Shepherd and [SUP][ab][/SUP]Guardian of your souls.
Still..... no scriptural reference to any assembly being "led" by ONE person.... but several scriptural references demonstrating multiple elders/overseers/shepherds as almost a requirement.
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
7,075
1,701
113
it did not mean that the principles he had formed in the Old Testament where to be done away with.
Hmmmm... that sort of flies in the face of all the words of Jesus when he repeatedly told the disciples "you have heard it said...... but I tell you..... "

The principle of murder being wrong was formed in the OT, but Jesus said that was done away with, that even to hate someone is wrong, let alone murder them.

That whole passage is about how the OT laws have been superseded by Jesus' new law...
 

EarsToHear

Senior Member
Jan 14, 2016
340
8
0
Hmmmm... that sort of flies in the face of all the words of Jesus when he repeatedly told the disciples "you have heard it said...... but I tell you..... "

The principle of murder being wrong was formed in the OT, but Jesus said that was done away with, that even to hate someone is wrong, let alone murder them.

That whole passage is about how the OT laws have been superseded by Jesus' new law...
Matthew 5:17-20


17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil (blood ordinances, for example).


18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.


19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.


20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.


The blood ordinances, however, were nailed to the cross.