Does Anyone Here Teach The Following?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

1ofthem

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
3,729
1,921
113
Amen!! What people don't get is that in MacArthur's book "The Gospel According to Jesus" he was only solidifying the true Gospel preached by the church for centuries. But, people have been so hoodwinked by the false free will gospel and decisional regeneration they could only see it as "works salvation." Any evidence of conversion, on-going sanctification, examination of conversion are all met with "that's a works gospel." Just think about that for a minute, it tells you people hold to not only a false gospel but to antinomianism. They will never see it but by God's grace.
Do you ever read the Bible for yourself or are you just into reading books that other men wrote about it?...smh
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,160
29,463
113
Molinists believe in middle knowledge, we believe in God's sovreign decree over all things, that's very different from the molinistic view, where God has 3 kinds of will and knowledge. Also the best world view is impossible, because God is perfect and unchangeable, He's unfazed by circumstances, and cannot change His mind, so He wouldn't look at all these multitute of universes and pick the best of them, because He's also all knowing, He would just create everything perfectly from the get go, that's why God says that in His creation, everything was very good.
I am not clear on the three types of knowledge aspect, but I have been affirming God's will operating in three modes for quite some time, even before hearing of Molinism (just heard of it today!). Do you disagree with God's will operating in three modes, those being sovereign, moral, and permissive?
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.
And if Jesus atoned for everybody w/o exception then the whole world, everybody w/o exception is saved.

Atoning sacrifice is also propitiation in other versions. Propitiation means God's wrath has been appeased, satiated. Now, if God's wrath has been appeased, then on the day of Judgment, there's not to be meted out. If none is meted out, then all w/o exception are saved.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,719
113
Don't you just love his passive-aggressive drive-by post?
I had "filed him away" at some point. Seems to follow me from thread to thread calling me names, slandering, lying, and talking about being loving.

None of them can prove their accusations. I recall this clan coming into my threads to protect wolves and to right off the bat call me everything but a white man for exposing well known heretics.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
I think it's wrong, and what do you mean the problem of time?
It seems to me that you think it is wrong because God would have to look at possible worlds and select ones.

But it is obvious it is just a human imagination, in God all knowledge is from eternity, so when we say "He selected the best world" we just say that He created such a world to exist.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,719
113
He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.
Oh, so everyone's sins have been atoned for? Wow. Do you know what that implies? If everyone's sins are atoned for then all are saved. You'd then be a Universalist with your take on the verse.
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,719
113
It seems to me that you think it is wrong because God would have to look at possible worlds and select ones.
Why would a perfect God have to look at options when all He does is perfect in all ways at all times.
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.
From Theopedia | An encyclopedia of Biblical Christianity....


Propitiation

"Propitiation means the turning away of wrath by an offering. In relation to soteriology, propitiation means placating or satisfying the wrath of God by the atoning sacrifice of Christ." Charles C. Ryrie (1999-01-11). Basic Theology: A Popular Systematic Guide to Understanding Biblical Truth (Kindle Locations 5503-5504). Moody Publishers. Kindle Edition.
"The word propitiation carries the basic idea of appeasement, or satisfaction, specifically towards God. Propitiation is a two-part act that involves appeasing the wrath of an offended person and being reconciled to them."^[1]^ Propitiation is that "by which it becomes consistent with his character and government to pardon and bless the sinner. The propitiation does not procure his love or make him loving; it only renders it consistent for him to exercise his love towards sinners."^[2]^
Background

Luke 18:13. In the parable of the "Pharisee and the Tax Collector", we also have an extraordinary use of the same word group. Note the Tax Collector cries out, "God, be merciful to me a sinner". Although our English translations do not bear it out in obvious fashion, this is a cognate verb, "be merciful" (hilaskomai). Note Colin Browns discussion: Vol. 3, 160
In Rom. 3:25 and Heb. 9:5 the Greek word hilasterion (KJV, "mercy-seat") is used. It is the word employed by the Septuagint (LXX). translators in Ex. 25:17 and elsewhere as the equivalent for the Hebrew kapporeth, which means "covering," and is used of the lid of the ark of the covenant (Ex. 25:21; 30:6). Hilasterion came to denote not only the mercy-seat or lid of the ark, but also propitiation or reconciliation by blood. On the great day of atonement the high priest carried the blood of the sacrifice he offered for all the people within the veil and sprinkled with it the "mercy-seat," and so made propitiation.^ [3]^
In 1 John 2:2; 4:10, Christ is called the "propitiation for our sins." Here a different Greek word is used, hilasmos. Christ is "the propitiation," because by his becoming our substitute and assuming our obligations he expiated our guilt, covering it by the vicarious punishment which he endured. (Compare Heb. 2:17, where the expression "make reconciliation" of the KJV is more correctly in the ASV "make propitiation").^[4]^
Propitiation versus Expiation

Propitiation literally means to make favorable and specifically includes the idea of dealing with God’s wrath against sinners. Expiation literally means to make pious and implies either the removal or cleansing of sin.
The idea of propitiation includes that of expiation as its means; but the word "expiation" has no reference to quenching God’s righteous anger. The difference is that the object of expiation is sin, not God. One propitiates a person, and one expiates a problem. Christ's death was therefore both an expiation and a propitiation. By expiating (removing the problem of) sin God was made propitious (favorable) to us.
The case for translating the Greek word hilasterion as "expiation" was put forward by C. H. Dodd in 1935 and gained wide support.^[5]^ As a result hilasterion has been translated as ‘expiation’ in the RSV and some other modern versions. But a generation of debate has shown, especially in the work of Leon Morris, that the linguistic evidence appears to favor “propitiation” as the more appropriate rendering.^ [6]^
ESV Study Bible on Propitiation in Romans 3:25

"Jesus' blood 'propitiated' or satisfied God’s wrath (1:18), so that his holiness was not compromised in forgiving sinners. Some scholars have argued that the word propitiation should be translated expiation (the wiping away of sin), but the word cannot be restricted to the wiping away of sins as it also refers to the satisfaction or appeasement of God’s wrath, turning it to favor (cf. note on John 18:11). God’s righteous anger needed to be appeased before sin could be forgiven, and God in his love sent his Son (who offered himself willingly) to satisfy God’s holy anger against sin. In this way God demonstrated his righteousness, which here refers particularly to his holiness and justice. God’s justice was called into question because in his patience he had overlooked former sins. In other words, how could God as the utterly Holy One tolerate human sin without inflicting full punishment on human beings immediately? Paul’s answer is that God looked forward to the cross of Christ where the full payment for the guilt of sin would be made, where Christ would die in the place of sinners. In the OT, propitiation (or the complete satisfaction of the wrath of God) is symbolically foreshadowed in several incidents: e.g., Ex. 32:11–14; Num. 25:8, 11; Josh. 7:25–26."
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,160
29,463
113
And if Jesus atoned for everybody w/o exception then the whole world, everybody w/o exception is saved.

Atoning sacrifice is also propitiation in other versions. Propitiation means God's wrath has been appeased, satiated. Now, if God's wrath has been appeased, then on the day of Judgment, there's not to be meted out. If none is meted out, then all w/o exception are saved.
That is where man's will comes in, for some reject Jesus, yes?

If they reject Jesus, they are not saved.

Do you disagree with 1 John 2:2?
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
There are more than a handful that reject the concept of hell and the lake of fire and the eternal aspect of suffering......
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,160
29,463
113
There are more than a handful that reject the concept of hell and the lake of fire and the eternal aspect of suffering......
You may as well say that there are many here who reject the goodness of God :D It would be a more true statement.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
You may as well say that there are many here who reject the goodness of God :D It would be a more true statement.
The same goodness, righteousness and holiness that led to the instantanious death and judgment of death upon even the innocent like the son of David and Bathsheba.....God's righteousness and holiness demands justice and judgment...his reward for faith and faithfulness is eternal......the flip side of the coin is equally true....!
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
That is where man's will comes in, for some reject Jesus, yes?

If they reject Jesus, they are not saved.

Do you disagree with 1 John 2:2?
I disagree with your interpretation of 1 John 2:2. If Jesus atoned for everyone w/o exception, then all w/o exception have been reconciled to God. None who have been reconciled to God die lost.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,160
29,463
113
The same goodness, righteousness and holiness that led to the instantanious death and judgment of death upon even the innocent like the son of David and Bathsheba.....God's righteousness and holiness demands justice and judgment...his reward for faith and faithfulness is eternal......the flip side of the coin is equally true....!
And yet Scripture plainly states that only God is immortal, while many bleat about the immortality of the soul and make up all sorts of nonsense in that regard, despite the plain teaching of Scripture that the wages of sin is death.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Got to go, its 00:30 here :) So the best world must wait till tomorrow.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,160
29,463
113
I disagree with your interpretation of 1 John 2:2. If Jesus atoned for everyone w/o exception, then all w/o exception have been reconciled to God. None who have been reconciled to God die lost.
Jesus atoned for all sin but that of blasphemy... He said so :)
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
Jesus atoned for all sin but that of blasphemy... He said so :)
And if all sin is atoned for, all go to heaven. The atonement removes God's wrath. Where there's no wrath, there's no punishment.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,160
29,463
113
And if all sin is atoned for, all go to heaven. The atonement removes God's wrath. Where there's no wrath, there's no punishment.
Why do you deliberately overlook blasphemy???