-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
N
both guilty true
but i disagree it was a cop out
the other option was lying
i also dont think eve did a cop out
...
she was also honest
and she was the only one who was decieved
id say what adam did being KNOWINGLY against God
may have been worse
even so
1 Timothy 2:14
14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression
but i disagree it was a cop out
the other option was lying
i also dont think eve did a cop out
...
she was also honest
and she was the only one who was decieved
id say what adam did being KNOWINGLY against God
may have been worse
even so
1 Timothy 2:14
14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression
B
It's called the blame game, neither one of them were willing to admit the didn't listen to God's word, and say Yes Father I didn't listen,
regardless if Eve wanted Adam to eat the friut, it was Adam's choice to obey God or to disobey God, Adam chose the latter.
Correct, Adam wasn't directly tempted by the serpent, he never heard the words of the serpent or was tempted by the serpent, it's a profound difference.
regardless if Eve wanted Adam to eat the friut, it was Adam's choice to obey God or to disobey God, Adam chose the latter.
Correct, Adam wasn't directly tempted by the serpent, he never heard the words of the serpent or was tempted by the serpent, it's a profound difference.
Last edited:
Kayla
Have you noticed that fashion trends for younger generation men tend to make them more effeminate? Skinny jeans that are rolled up at the ankles untucked shirts[looks like blouse or dress] little suede shoes and suede chukka boots, faded haircuts, big beards, handlebar mustaches, piercings and trendy spectacles/glasses and even little caps........the younger generation male pastor looks like a gay boy ad for ambercrombie and fitch or Calvin Klein....
I hear all the time......I have to dress this way to be relevant and popular with those I am trying to reach....
funny thing about relevance and popularity....Jesus and his "squad" never had to be relevant and for sure, were not ever popular....
Have you noticed that fashion trends for younger generation men tend to make them more effeminate? Skinny jeans that are rolled up at the ankles untucked shirts[looks like blouse or dress] little suede shoes and suede chukka boots, faded haircuts, big beards, handlebar mustaches, piercings and trendy spectacles/glasses and even little caps........the younger generation male pastor looks like a gay boy ad for ambercrombie and fitch or Calvin Klein....
I hear all the time......I have to dress this way to be relevant and popular with those I am trying to reach....
funny thing about relevance and popularity....Jesus and his "squad" never had to be relevant and for sure, were not ever popular....
K
Yes,I have noticed,I think men notice it more possibly. I cannot understand why a man that isn't gay would wear these things,especially the tight pants that are obviously meant to advertise to other gay men.Yet I see young married men wearing them and it looks ridiculous. It looks like they are wearing their little brother clothes. It looks far from masculine. And if my husband,which he definitely wouldn't,came home with skinny pants that would be a trip back to the store. It kind of a joke between us as he's tall and broad and would look hysterical in the "new style".
An interesting detail to take note of here is that the commandment was not given to Eve directly but to Adam, for Eve was not yet made when God instituted that stipulation in relation to the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Another is the fact that we do not know why Eve added to it by saying they must not touch the tree, as well as not eating of it. Men may of course say Eve added that all by herself, when it is just as possible that Adam added that when he told Eve. We simply are not told.
N
ive always wondered that
like maybe she went to grab it
and he was like
"DONT TOUCH THAT"
and simply explained not to eat it
and neither lied
but eve just assumed maybe because Adam told her not to even touch it
lol me and my brother argued about this very topic for weeks when i FIRST read Genisis
i also assumed adam threw eve under the bus too
thought it was very cowardly
like maybe she went to grab it
and he was like
"DONT TOUCH THAT"
and simply explained not to eat it
and neither lied
but eve just assumed maybe because Adam told her not to even touch it
lol me and my brother argued about this very topic for weeks when i FIRST read Genisis
i also assumed adam threw eve under the bus too
thought it was very cowardly
as soon as Eve entered into dialogue with the serpent, she seems to have been
brought under his power/spell, and therefore she started embellishing, and they
were both were drawn-away by their own LUST - just one more way of looking at it...
even though they both 'walked/talked' with God, obviously they both had
the same human 'traits' as we do today...
there's an 'old Jewish saying, we are all like Adam and Eve'.
brought under his power/spell, and therefore she started embellishing, and they
were both were drawn-away by their own LUST - just one more way of looking at it...
even though they both 'walked/talked' with God, obviously they both had
the same human 'traits' as we do today...
there's an 'old Jewish saying, we are all like Adam and Eve'.
I have not heard their teachings before... but it is something that became a well known practice within Judaism, which contributed greatly to the terrible letter of the law they had to follow, such as not even picking up a mat on Sabbath because that was considered work. I have heard the idea is called "putting a hedge around." It is meant to protect but just goes to ridiculous extremes as we can easily see, and the result is a legalism that Jesus spoke against often to those that promoted such things, those people being largely the scribes and Pharisees.
K
I particularly dislike the floppy hairstyle,shaved on both sides. A few years ago men were wearing shoes that were long and pointed at the toe. I dont know if you remember it. I joked with my husband that I was going to buy him a pair. He wears size 14, I might just as well buy him canoes.rofl You can dress with style without dressing IN the style. Not that I care much for style or name brands. Im often asked where I get my clothes and I just smile and keep the secret and let them think it cost big dollars when its from Wal-mart.lol lol