The flat earth is not true,for there is mountains,and hills,and holes,and different areas with different elevations,across the planet.
So listen to logic and stop the debate.
When we observe it going from light to dark,or dark to light,it appears to vanish,and appear,at one time,which would make sense on a globe earth as the sun goes down.
If you shine a flashlight you can see the dividing point of the light from the dark,as the light can only go so far.
If it rains we can see the rain ahead of us,and if it passes through our area we can observe it get dry,and then the rain as it leaves our area,causing a dividing point that we can see.
A dividing point.
If it is dark for so long,and light for so long,then the light of the sun can only go so far concerning a flat earth.
If the sun is always 3000 miles above the earth's surface why don't we see the dividing point of the light from the dark,as it goes from dark to light,and light to dark.
We should be able to observe darkness ahead of us,as it is light in our area,and see the darkness pass through our area,and then observe the light leaving our area and going off in to the distance.
There should be a dividing point for the sun is always 3000 miles above the earth's surface,and the light can only go so far,for there is night and day,so we should be able to see a dividing point between the light and the dark.
But on a globe earth it would not be like that but when the sun basically goes down the light would appear to all go,or appear in one steady stream that we can observe.
A genius with an I.Q. of 250 did a table test to prove that on a flat earth the sun can appear to come up over the horizon,by placing a camera at table level,and back about 6 feet,although it appeared to be below the table level,but he is the genius,not me,so who am I to question him,and ran a quarter across the table,and it appeared to come up over the horizon,for now you do not see it,now you do,even though it ran across a flat surface.
But the sun is not going along the earth's surface,and the earth is not behind the sun when we would observe it coming up over the horizon,and we are not floating in space to be able to observe it at the end of the earth.Funny.
But where is the dividing point that we should be able to observe of the light from the dark if the sun is always 3000 miles above the earth's surface,and the light of the sun can only go so far as it does not light the entire planet at one time.
We should be able to see with the naked eye as we are standing outside the dividing point between light and dark,for the light of the sun can only go so far,and then it is dark after that,and the sun is always 3000 miles above earth,so it is a steady light stream at the same level.
I do not get it for I know we would see a dividing point for we would have to,for we would see it dark in the distance ahead of us,while it is light in our area,and then the darkness would pass through our area,and we would see the light going away from us in to the distance,for it would have to be like that,for how can it be different.
The darkness would follow the light,and the light the darkness,at that time of the day when it goes from dark to light,and light to dark,in which would be a great amount of darkness following the light,and a great amount of light following the darkness,because the light of the sun can only go so far and have a ending point,and then darkness for the light cannot go any further.
There would have to be a dividing point that we can see that would not be like what we observe happening between it going from dark to light,and light to dark.
On a flat earth going from dark to light,and light to dark,would not appear as what we observe happening,and it does not take research for that for it seems like it would be common sense.
But it would make sense on a global earth with what we observe between light and dark,for when the sun goes down,or comes up,it lights across the planet,for it is low at that point,and makes it appear as it is being all lit up at one time from what we can observe.
It would not appear like that on a flat earth,and the sun always 3000 miles above the earth's surface.
I agree with this. The biggest problem is that most people tend to take what the scriptures say about the description of the Earth very, very literally. You got to remember, the King James is the closest account to the Holy Scriptures, and it doesn't say that the Earth is flat. I truly believe if the Lord wanted that known, He'd have made it known it was completely flat.
There's a lot wrong with the flat Earth model. Number one, it looks EXACTLY like the United Nations logo, almost a spitting image. Number two, if the sun is only 3000 miles away, it shouldn't just be spotting here or there, it should be shining light everywhere on the Earth, and in that case, when the sun rises, how come we see the sunlight reflecting off the bottom of the clouds, especially towards the Easterly clouds? On a flat Earth where the sun is supposed to be fixed and above everything, that shouldn't happen, but it does.
Another thing that bothers me is that there's an Ice Wall around our Earth supposedly, and beyond that is infinity, but nobody has ever seen this thing or even reached the edge. You'd think that with ALL the photos and videos we see of a Globe earth, someone would have substantial evidence to contradict it, but they don't. At least, I don't see it.
As far as a firmament, yes, there is a dome....it's called the atmosphere, and it extends around the entire planet, that's the firmament God put in place to protect our Earth. Don't take the four corners of the Earth literally, when it comes to that verse of scripture, that is referring to the points North, South, East, and West. That is not indicative of a flat Earth by any means.
While it is true that a lot of scientists and mathematicians have a skewed view of the so called "evolution" of man (which is completely false by the way, we know this from God's word), many of the people who work for NASA, JAXA, ESA, and so many other organizations around the world with a space program, are faith driven Christian people, and I don't believe they would stay in that field if they truly felt they were being deceived. They know the truth, and it's an exciting field to study.
Consider this, they say the moon landings were fake. But yet take Neil Armstrong, the first man to ever set foot on the lunar surface. If you read into the background of Neil Armstrong, you will find he was a devout Christian man, loving father, fighter pilot, aerospace engineer, and loving husband. If the moon landings were fake, I would have to believe that somewhere a Christian man such as Armstrong would have walked away and exposed NASA for being deceitful, yet that has never happened, and there is no record of that ever being an occurrence.
Speaking of Armstrong, I have to say, that I admire who this man was, and his belief in our Lord Jesus Christ. After Apollo 11's mission to moon in 1969, he went on a tour of old Jerusalem. When they got to the Hulda Gate, which is at the top of the stairs to the TempleMount, he asked his guide if those were the steps in which Jesus travelled, in which it was confirmed that they were. Neil's response was, "I have to tell you, I am more excited stepping on these stones where my Lord walked, than I was stepping on the moon."
I have to imagine, this was a devout saved follower of Christ, yet the Lord allowed him to see things beyond our wildest dreams and do something that not just ANYONE gets to do. If NASA and the world are in a conspiracy to try and fool the whole world.....I highly doubt this man would have been in on it. You can be saved by Christ and still believe and see the Earth is round in shape. You're not deceived by that.