Are women allowed to Preach?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
This is one of his favourite phrases when he disagrees with someone. Dismiss their opinion/observation as "nonsense".

Not every piece of scripture has manuscript variance and notable alterations so no, the accusation that anything in scripture could be questioned on that basis is unfounded.
Thats why it is better to just ignore certain people Just not worth it..
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,769
113
It's not at variance with his own ideas. It's at variance with other scripture, including what Paul has said elsewhere.

But then, this is what you always find unless you let go of the letter and seek the spirit of the word.
More nonsense from the naysayers, who are now attempting to cast doubt on the written Word of God. The fact that ABSOLUTELY every English translation has 1 Cor 14:34 and ABSOLUTELY every Greek text has the same verse is sufficient to confirm that there is no doubt whatsoever about this verse or this passage of Scripture or the context in which it was written.

Let me put it more bluntly: WHEN CHRISTIANS CAST DOUBT ON AUTHENTIC SCRIPTURE THEY ARE DOING THE DEVIL'S WORK.
 

Stunnedbygrace

Senior Member
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
823
113
Okay, you're right. We are all doing the devils work. We should be kicked out. :rolleyes:
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest


I was saved in jail. I went to a place called faith farm for about a year. It is a place for alcoholics and addicts. Often I have seen men enter under the influence and some so strung out they could barely speak. Many of those same men are now some of the greatest ambassadors for Christ I have ever seen. While I am not a homosexual I have seen both men and women delivered from that and much worse at places like celebrate recovery. I do not like to ever try and put limits on how God works or who He chooses. He choose me though I was a truly evil person, selfish and greedy. He choose you too and though you may not see it, when He saved you you were just as unworthy and unclean as those you speak of. I have found that humbleness brings blessings, and for me that means never forgetting just how bad I had become before He liberated me.
That was a very good testimony my friend and I am so glad you sought after the LORD and found Him. That was the greatest and most wise decision you ever made in your entire life. I am not afraid to admit that I too was a horribly selfish person at one time caught up in the evil web of alcoholism and drugs. And just as you, I have seen the walls of jail many times. I understand there are places that will receive an individual no matter his/her condition or state of mind and immediately have them go through a detox program and begin to minister unto them. Those facilities are a valuable asset to our society and we could surely use many more of them. However, in our earlier conversation we were speaking of the "church" itself. The Bible states that a minister must protect his flock. In doing so, there are simply certain individuals not in any condition to be sitting among the congregation until they receive some other type of treatment for their problems. Such as detox. It would not be wise to allow those "strung out" as you say to be sitting aside his congregation while he is attempting to minister the gospel. In those cases the individual needs to go through some other sort of program first, just like you were mentioning, "before" sitting in the pews of a church. Your testimony that you went to "faith farm" prior to sitting directly in a church is a prime example of just what I am referring to. I have not suggested placing any limits upon who should be offered help and the true word. If that is, in any way, what you believe then you have misunderstood my thoughts and my position. Again , I am glad you have turned your life around and I have no desire to attack you on anything. I simply felt it necessary to point out the fact that not everyone is ready to begin sitting within the church. I pointed out that fact, only because it appeared as though you were thinking it was fine for "anyone" to immediately join the congregation. Something that is not always a wise thing to do.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
692
113
So for argument's sake, if we make the assumption that 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 was not written by Paul, we are left with 1 Timothy 2:11-12, which says:

Let a wife learn in stillness in all submission. And a wife I do not transfer to their care to teach, nor to dominate a husband, but to be in stillness. 1 Timothy 2:11-12

stillness
G2271 ἡσυχία hesuchia (hay-soo-khee'-ah) n.
1. (as noun) stillness, i.e. desistance from bustle or language

dominate
G831 αὐθεντέω authenteo (au-then-teh'-o) v.
1. to act of oneself
2. (figuratively) dominate

Perhaps Paul was simply giving rules of conduct for the churches he supervised in a Mediterranean environment, where nowadays women are known to be talkative, animated and demonstrative.
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest
Do you think men are in charge of the church?
What I believe is exactly what the Bible says. God appointed man to keep His commandments and to be the teachers within the church. According to scripture, it is very clear that God chose to work through man to pass along His word inside of the church. Anyone that believes anything to the contrary, is disregarding what the Bible states. It is God who is in charge of the church and He has set forth clear rules as to how he wants that to take place.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
692
113
Notice how 1 Corinthians 14:29-40 flows without verses 34,35. It's all about prophesying decently and in order.

  • Let two or three prophets speak, and the others evaluate. (1 Corinthians 14:29)
  • And if [something] is revealed to another who is seated, the first must be silent. (1 Corinthians 14:30)
  • For you are all able to prophesy in turn, in order that all may learn and all may be encouraged, (1 Corinthians 14:31)
  • and the spirits of prophets are subject to prophets. (1 Corinthians 14:32)
  • For God is not [a God of] disorder but of peace. As in all the churches of the saints, (1 Corinthians 14:33)
    [*]the women must be silent in the churches, for it is not permitted for them to speak, but they must be in submission, just as the law also says. (1 Corinthians 14:34)
    [*]But if they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home, for it is shameful for a woman to speak in church. (1 Corinthians 14:35)
  • Or has the word of God gone out from you, or has it come to you only? (1 Corinthians 14:36)
  • If anyone thinks he is a prophet or spiritual, he should recognize that [the things] which I am writing to you are a command of the Lord. (1 Corinthians 14:37)
  • But if anyone ignores [this], he is ignored. (1 Corinthians 14:38)
  • So then, my brothers, desire to prophesy, and do not prevent speaking with tongues. (1 Corinthians 14:39)
  • But let all [things] be [done] decently and according to proper procedure. (1 Corinthians 14:40)
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest
Sorry. Every time anyone is allowed to enter. The only time they are approached is if they do 1 Cor. 14 disrupting. (You know the one where you think women shouldn't preach, but really it's about order in the gathering?) And they are most definitely approached then. By one or two elders, (depending on the situation), and then escorted to another room to talk/witness.

IF he/they cannot calm the person down and get to the point of communicating, then, and only then, is the person escorted out. AND, if it is a mental problem, they are escorted out to an ambulance for treatment.

The church should always be open to anyone.

Membership, however, is given to the ones who declare they believe certain things all Christians need to believe.
So then, you are oh so animate that "anyone" should be allowed into the church, then you would have no problem if a drunkard was sitting next to you getting sick all over your dress. And no problem if a pedophile was fondling your grand daughter right next to you. And no problem if two homosexuals were having sex in the pews. Now, according to what you have said, then you would be in favor of these people staying for the sermon and all the members having to suffer through the ordeal of dealing with this ungodly situation. That is the stance you have taken with your words because you are a very unreasonable and argumentative woman who rejects common sense. Obviously, these things should never be allowed to happen within a church, yet you have offered them great defense.
 
Sep 4, 2012
14,424
692
113
Apparently this is how 1 Corinthians 14 appears in about half of the western manuscripts.

  • Let two or three prophets speak, and the others evaluate. (1 Corinthians 14:29)
  • And if [something] is revealed to another who is seated, the first must be silent. (1 Corinthians 14:30)
  • For you are all able to prophesy in turn, in order that all may learn and all may be encouraged, (1 Corinthians 14:31)
  • and the spirits of prophets are subject to prophets. (1 Corinthians 14:32)
  • For God is not [a God of] disorder but of peace. As in all the churches of the saints, (1 Corinthians 14:33)
  • Or has the word of God gone out from you, or has it come to you only? (1 Corinthians 14:36)
  • If anyone thinks he is a prophet or spiritual, he should recognize that [the things] which I am writing to you are a command of the Lord. (1 Corinthians 14:37)
  • But if anyone ignores [this], he is ignored. (1 Corinthians 14:38)
  • So then, my brothers, desire to prophesy, and do not prevent speaking with tongues. (1 Corinthians 14:39)
  • But let all [things] be [done] decently and according to proper procedure. (1 Corinthians 14:40)
    [*]the women must be silent in the churches, for it is not permitted for them to speak, but they must be in submission, just as the law also says. (1 Corinthians 14:34)
    [*]But if they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home, for it is shameful for a woman to speak in church. (1 Corinthians 14:35)
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,536
17,013
113
69
Tennessee
If God's word has allowed it? Absolutely! Are we not to submit authority to God's word? It's not a degrading of women issue. It's an obedience issue.
Glad to hear this. I will give a like to your post. We're all good.
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,536
17,013
113
69
Tennessee
More nonsense from the naysayers, who are now attempting to cast doubt on the written Word of God. The fact that ABSOLUTELY every English translation has 1 Cor 14:34 and ABSOLUTELY every Greek text has the same verse is sufficient to confirm that there is no doubt whatsoever about this verse or this passage of Scripture or the context in which it was written.

Let me put it more bluntly: WHEN CHRISTIANS CAST DOUBT ON AUTHENTIC SCRIPTURE THEY ARE DOING THE DEVIL'S WORK.
Casting doubt and expressing doubt are two different things.
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest
Casting doubt and expressing doubt are two different things.
That right there is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. They are exactly the same thing. When one expresses doubt for God's word on this forum, then certainly they are casting it for others to hear. And the casting of that doubt is obviously an expression of it.
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest
Sorry, but you have just gone out where the buses don't run with this diatribe.

People must be "stable" enough to come to the assembly? Show me any kind of scripture for that, Mr "I'm here to teach you the word more clearly"

The "pastor" decides who is stable enough to enter? Show me ANY scripture that says that. Or ANY scripture that says an assembly is run by "a pastor" ..... NOT scriptural at all.

Yes, PLEASE show me a scripture about that... And don't give me the scripture about doing things "decently and in order".... that is strictly about what happens in an assembly, NOT about who gets to attend.

Jesus came to save sinners. He fellowshipped with the lowest of the low in his society... sat down and ate with them. The church assembly is a HOSPITAL FOR SINNERS, for YOUR edification... not some exclusive country club that only those "good enough" can enter...

Your brand of acceptance is sickening, and is why most of the "lost" of this world want nothing to do with it. I urge you to read what Jesus actually did, and what he taught, and repent from your haughty, exclusive beliefs.

You should be ashamed...
1COR 14:37 If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.

1COR 14:38 But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.

1COR 14:39 Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues.

1COR 14:40 Let all things be done decently and in order.

"DECENTLY AND IN ORDER" certainly IS about who gets to attend. How do you expect things to be done in orderly fashion when you allow disorderly people to attend ? You refuse to apply logic to your argument. And it is common sense that dictates the pastor must make these decisions as he is the one God has placed in charge of the gathering.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,325
13,713
113
Are you saying God has allowed women to be pastors over a local church but they are not an elder? Is this anti-female? Women cannot be elders?

Genesis 3 and Ephesians 5:22-23 God is the head of Christ. Christ is the head of the husband. The husband is the head of his wife.
Asking questions based on bad paraphrases or misrepresentations of my words is silly and adds nothing to the conversation except rabbit trails. Quote me accurately, and respond to what I actually wrote. Don’t put words in my mouth and waste your time responding to those; that’s called a straw man fallacy.

I have already addressed Genesis 3 and your misrepresentation of 1 Corinthians 11.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,325
13,713
113
More nonsense from the naysayers, who are now attempting to cast doubt on the written Word of God. The fact that ABSOLUTELY every English translation has 1 Cor 14:34 and ABSOLUTELY every Greek text has the same verse is sufficient to confirm that there is no doubt whatsoever about this verse or this passage of Scripture or the context in which it was written.

Let me put it more bluntly: WHEN CHRISTIANS CAST DOUBT ON AUTHENTIC SCRIPTURE THEY ARE DOING THE DEVIL'S WORK.
So don't cast doubt on it!

The issue is never with what the Scripture says. You keep harping on this as though we're saying "black" when Scripture says "red". That is a complete misrepresentation of the issues.

The issue is entirely one of interpretation.

Since you choose to be blunt, you must desire that in response: Get off your straw hobby horse and deal with the actual arguments put forth, or get out of the thread.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,325
13,713
113
That right there is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. They are exactly the same thing. When one expresses doubt for God's word on this forum, then certainly they are casting it for others to hear. And the casting of that doubt is obviously an expression of it.
I disagree. Expressing doubt is like, "I am not convinced of that. I'd like to research it more." Casting doubt is like, "I am certain that wording comes from a corrupted source." "Casting" has the sense of causing others to doubt; "expressing" doesn't.

For the record, I see far more of the latter from KJV-only proponents than from those who use a variety of translations.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
What I believe is exactly what the Bible says. God appointed man to keep His commandments and to be the teachers within the church. According to scripture, it is very clear that God chose to work through man to pass along His word inside of the church. Anyone that believes anything to the contrary, is disregarding what the Bible states. It is God who is in charge of the church and He has set forth clear rules as to how he wants that to take place.
What you believe God's word is teaching you is your opinion as a private interpretation..Like fingerprints evey man has one. There is one infalible teacher as our giude and comforter. In that way we are intsrtcted to call no man teacher of earth.Men unlike Christ a differnt kind of teaching ministry, we do need any human to teach us

The fact of the matter is God is not served by human lips or hands. Why you would desire to make it about male dna?


It is God who makes one different giving them gifts that are not of themselves.
 
L

loyaldisciple

Guest
I disagree. Expressing doubt is like, "I am not convinced of that. I'd like to research it more." Casting doubt is like, "I am certain that wording comes from a corrupted source." "Casting" has the sense of causing others to doubt; "expressing" doesn't.

For the record, I see far more of the latter from KJV-only proponents than from those who use a variety of translations.
You can disagree all you want that casting doubt and expressing doubt are not the same thing, but that doesn't change the fact that they are the same. One cannot cast doubt without expressing it. And one cannot express any doubt without at least casting it upon one person. And those in here expressing their doubt of God's word is casting it upon the entire forum of people witnessing that doubt.