Not By Works

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

BillG

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2017
9,025
4,444
113
Hi Endoscopy, simple answer, many bible students believe that Cain's offering is the works of his hands and not the blood sacrifice that God requires for the forgiveness of sin's. Able's offering was by grace through faith but Cain's offering was by works not grace. Dcon said he will be gone for a couple of days, if my answer is insufficient he will set things straight.

Genesis4:4-5
4b)
The Lord looked with favor on Abel and his offering, 5) but on Cain and his offering he did not look with favor. So Cain was very angry, and his face was downcast.

Hebrews11:4
4)
By faith Abel offered to God a more acceptable sacrifice than Cain, through which he was commended as righteous, God commending him by accepting his gifts. And through his faith, though he died, he still speaks.

Hebrews9:22
22)
According to the Law, in fact, nearly everything must be purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.
Would Cain and Abel have known the difference between the blood sacrifice for forgiveness and works for forgiveness?

We know in genesis that God said about crushing the head of the one who bruised his heel.

Would Adam & Eve knew what that it meant?

What do you think?
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Would Cain and Abel have known the difference between the blood sacrifice for forgiveness and works for forgiveness?

We know in genesis that God said about crushing the head of the one who bruised his heel.

Would Adam & Eve knew what that it meant?

What do you think?
For Abel to offer a lamb without blemish or spot and shed blood he would have had to have known....NOT TO MENTION that he would have known the story of GOD SHEDDING BLOOD anf making skins to cover Adam and Eve's shame.
 

BillG

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2017
9,025
4,444
113
Does that make me a millionaire that owns a mansion and a yacht? hahah
Nope but one day you will have a mansion in heaven or at least live in one.

If before then you become a millionaire, throw some my way so I can upgrade from my garden shed.
 

BillG

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2017
9,025
4,444
113
For Abel to offer a lamb without blemish or spot and shed blood he would have had to have known....NOT TO MENTION that he would have known the story of GOD SHEDDING BLOOD anf making skins to cover Adam and Eve's shame.
TT was right
 

benhur

Senior Member
Feb 8, 2018
1,534
121
63
Again for the sake of new readers the following must be rejected or denied to teach a salvation that can be lost like a dime in the park...

The gifts if God are irrevocable
The seal of God can be broken
We are saved to the uttermost
We are kept by the power of God
Eternal life does not mean eternal life
Everlasting life means temporary life
Born of incorruptable seed
Justified means guilty
LOSE NOTHING means tossed away
Will not forsake you means forsaken
Chastisment means loss if salvation
In the Father's hand means yanked out of
In the Son's hand means yanked out of
I will lose nothing means something is lost
I will nevet leave thee means we have been left

and on and on and on.......if the above are chunked aside and or do not mean what they mean NO ONE IS SAVED or will be saved.....

There is not a just man upon the esrth that does good and sins not!
You can have all of the above, but John says:

John 15:1-3 King James Version (KJV)
15 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman.
2 Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.

Notice Jesus says "EVERY BRANCH IN ME" will be taken away if they do not produce fruit. What this means is you can claim your saved and trust and have faith all you want, but if all that power does not produce fruit, you will not be with Jesus in EL. Sorry.
 

RedeemedGift

Senior Member
May 28, 2017
158
41
28
34
All of scripture is given by God. Are you saying the words of Jesus to look at the works (fruit) to see what a person is should be ignored. Remember he was talking about wolves in sheep's clothing. In other words a secular person masquerading as a Christian. Today fake ministers have taken over denominations. Gary North wrote the book Crossed Fingers documenting the take over of Presbyterian USA in 1932 by secular ministers in order to have access to the church funds. The last true minister in control of some church funds, a Reverend Mechan, was defrocked to remove him from the mission money. These are the wolves in sheep's clothing we are to look to their fruits (works). As Jesus said you will know them by their fruits. As I stated before at a special invitation evening service with refreshments being served a man from a Lutheran church heard the gospel message for the first time. That man testified to the fruits of the minister of that church. Thus proving he was a wolf in sheep's clothing. The fruit of a secular minister is never preaching the gospel message. By their fruits you shall know them. I stand by that statement of Jesus. The fruit of a Christian minister is always preaching the gospel. The fruit of a secular minister is never preaching the gospel message.
All scripture is indeed given by God which is why He cannot be confused with what His gospel message is supposed to be.

You are referring to Matthew 7:16? Is the interpretation you have of it consistent with the immediate context? The context is of false teachers who are likened to bad trees. What is the fruit of a teacher? His teachings. False prophets are clearly identified as unbelievers, those who are not saved. Christ was not asserting a works-based salvation "gospel", or else why did the apostle John bother recording Christ's words that clearly contradict the idea you are asserting to be true?

This secular minister is an example of what all too often happens in a church, but it has nothing to do with any idea of a saint gaining or losing their salvation based on any works.
 

benhur

Senior Member
Feb 8, 2018
1,534
121
63
[QUOT3E="calibob, post: 3714250, member: 270740"]That's where a part of the problem lay. Many OSAS people would say people who would do as you have described weren't really saved at all aren't circumcised in the heart or the Holy Spirit wouldn't allow them to do as you say. Kneeling at a cross or an alter and just saying the sinners prayer doesn't save anyone. If it doesn't come from the heart it's dung.


_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



So once you are saved, you are always saved. We get that, that is what OSAS means. But there are many scriptures that tell us that OSAS is not true and the scriptures you give tell me that Christ will always be true to his word, but says nothing about what our obligation is. Our obligation cannot be to just sit by and let Jesus carry us into heaven without lifting a finger.

The scriptures tell us that we have to be active in the work of the Lord. If we are not he will not save us in his kingdom. If we are, he will save us in his kingdom. Are we going to be sheep and follow him and be active in the work of the Lord, or are we going to be goats and be continuously rebellious and not be active in the work of the Lord.

As John 15:2 says "every branch IN ME that does not produce fruit, will be taken away. So be a sheep and produce fruit (be active in the work of the Lord) or lose your EL.
[/QUOTE]
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
You can have all of the above, but John says:

John 15:1-3 King James Version (KJV)
15 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman.
2 Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.

Notice Jesus says "EVERY BRANCH IN ME" will be taken away if they do not produce fruit. What this means is you can claim your saved and trust and have faith all you want, but if all that power does not produce fruit, you will not be with Jesus in EL. Sorry.
You should be sorry for butchering the word of God with your losable salvation drivel....
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
All scripture is indeed given by God which is why He cannot be confused with what His gospel message is supposed to be.

You are referring to Matthew 7:16? Is the interpretation you have of it consistent with the immediate context? The context is of false teachers who are likened to bad trees. What is the fruit of a teacher? His teachings. False prophets are clearly identified as unbelievers, those who are not saved. Christ was not asserting a works-based salvation "gospel", or else why did the apostle John bother recording Christ's words that clearly contradict the idea you are asserting to be true?

This secular minister is an example of what all too often happens in a church, but it has nothing to do with any idea of a saint gaining or losing their salvation based on any works.
@benhur this is how you properly interpret scripture.....of course we all know the word context is not in your vocabulary...nor do you employ it when you yank a verse or verses out of context to peddle a faux salvation that can be lost or kept by self effort!
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Nope but one day you will have a mansion in heaven or at least live in one.

If before then you become a millionaire, throw some my way so I can upgrade from my garden shed.
Hahahhahha technically....I do have 10 houses on 50 acres......cough cough ;)
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Prolly something to do with "Cainology" ;)
Hahahhaah thanks....missed your sword and whitticism hahah You know...I came up with another word as well....Apostatization <-- a buddy who taught English in college in Peroria Illinois was going to submit it for me haha maybe Cainology or Cainologist should be submitted to accurately describe false teachers that peddle a vanilla cafe false blend of faith and works for salvation...haha
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
60,133
29,450
113
Hahahhaah thanks....missed your sword and whitticism hahah You know...I came up with another word as well....Apostatization <-- a buddy who taught English in college in Peroria Illinois was going to submit it for me haha maybe Cainology or Cainologist should be submitted to accurately describe false teachers that peddle a vanilla cafe false blend of faith and works for salvation...haha
Awwww, thanks, David. This is kind of like a home thread for me :cool:
 

TruthTalk

Senior Member
Jul 17, 2017
2,904
2,262
113
Would Cain and Abel have known the difference between the blood sacrifice for forgiveness and works for forgiveness?

We know in genesis that God said about crushing the head of the one who bruised his heel.

Would Adam & Eve knew what that it meant?

What do you think?
I do not have all the info you are asking for but what we do know is after the fall in the garden God made for Adam and Eve garments made from animal skins, bible scholars say that that was the first sacrifice and shedding of blood for forgiveness of sins.

Since Cain and Able were Adam and Eves first children its not a stretch to say that they were given a lesson on how to receive forgiveness of sin. Frankly it is our Sovereign God's decision to reject Cain's offering but the bible does not tell us what Cain did not know or what he did know. However we can take a lesson from Cain about what is not an acceptable offering to God.

Genesis3:21
The LORD God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them.

Genesis3:15
13Then the Lord God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?”
The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.”
14So the Lord God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this,
“Cursed are you above all livestock
and all wild animals!
You will crawl on your belly
and you will eat dust
all the days of your life.
15And I will put enmity
between you and the woman,
and between your offspring a and hers;
he will crush b your head,
and you will strike his heel.”
 

benhur

Senior Member
Feb 8, 2018
1,534
121
63
Brother a few points to ponder....

a. You don't know me nor the depth of what I know or don't know

b. Who cares what Zola has to say...I have seen him before and he is not always right

c. You have seen me post enough to know that I do not just whip belief systems out of a hat and that I am not unlearned in the scriptures

d. Your replies, as well as another poster, have been demeaning, baseless and dismissive of the above as well as of the fact that I am not some 18 year old seminary student....I have 4 years of seminary, 32 years of study, have filled in, preached revivals, taught at upwards of 30 churches, been on TV, radio, internet, written a 212 page book on the subject, and have without embellishment proclaimed to truth to millions....so please....do not treat me like I just came out of sunday school at age 7.....when by the way, I was doing 12th grade algebra, making solor models and studying atoms..............

Yeah I know....the above does not equate to being right and for the record...I am more than willing to admit error and or mold my belief when a greater understanding has come along or I am proven to be in error.

For the last time....I was raised believing in the imminent return, I believed it, defended it dogmatically and stood on it UNTIL I actually stsrted studying the bibke, being honest with the verbiage, word definitions, context etc......and in my VIEW the bible does not teach the imminent return of Christ...there are NUMEROUS EVENTS THAT MUST OCCUR FIRST....when those EVENTS HAVE TAKEN PLACE THEN AND ONLY THEN CAN WE LOOK up for his return!

Take it or leave it...no matter...I still consider you a saved brother in Christ!
The thing about Jesus is that he was God, but humbled himself to become our servant. He was an incredibly powerful man, but the most humble of men. Be ye thererfore like him, or you will in no wise have EL.
 
Sep 9, 2018
2,244
1,032
113
71
Illinois
Hahahhaah thanks....missed your sword and whitticism hahah You know...I came up with another word as well....Apostatization <-- a buddy who taught English in college in Peroria Illinois was going to submit it for me haha maybe Cainology or Cainologist should be submitted to accurately describe false teachers that peddle a vanilla cafe false blend of faith and works for salvation...haha
Peoria . . . I spent a week there one day.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
The thing about Jesus is that he was God, but humbled himself to become our servant. He was an incredibly powerful man, but the most humble of men. Be ye thererfore like him, or you will in no wise have EL.
Trust Jesus for salvation by faith instead of your working for false gospel or you will in no way, shape or form enter the kingdom...right now your dogma is akin to the MANY that come before the throne boasting of their works as their proof of a right to enter....
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Peoria . . . I spent a week there one day.

And.....? hahah Just noticed I mispelled it.....hahahah Last time i was there was to see my buddy who died of cancer the day after I left....He seen me and said, "David my friend" We cried our eyes out and I told him I love you man...a friend for 40 years...was a bad day!