Pre-Trib Rapture and Premillennialism are False Doctrines
- Thread starter delirious
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sure. Keep reading to the next chapter.
Rom 3:1 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?
Rom 3:2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.
Rom 3:3 For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?
Replacement theology dumpstered. Next!
Rom 3:1 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?
Rom 3:2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.
Rom 3:3 For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?
Replacement theology dumpstered. Next!
I'm not "spirtualizing" anything - scripture is spiritually discerned.
You need to look at how Jesus spiritually discerned John the Baptist as Elijah
Mat 17:10 And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come?
Mat 17:13 Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.
Did Jesus "spiritulize" Elijah?
History is on my side - 2000 years and no sign of Jesus, the anti-christ, the 2 witnesses. Thinking some fake atheist Jews in Palestine is the restoration of Israel is just without merit.
What the dispensationalists have created is a myth come conspiracy theory. It's sad really.
You need to look at how Jesus spiritually discerned John the Baptist as Elijah
Mat 17:10 And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come?
Mat 17:13 Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.
Did Jesus "spiritulize" Elijah?
History is on my side - 2000 years and no sign of Jesus, the anti-christ, the 2 witnesses. Thinking some fake atheist Jews in Palestine is the restoration of Israel is just without merit.
What the dispensationalists have created is a myth come conspiracy theory. It's sad really.
-
1
- Show all
There is no such thing as replacement theology, you can't replace something that never existed. The flesh descendants of Israel have never been and never will be the children of God.
Rom 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
Rom 9:7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
Rom 9:8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
Rom 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
Rom 9:7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
Rom 9:8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
-
2
- Show all
Quite right when speaking of "replacement" theology according to dispensensationalism - the true replacement theology is replacing the physical nation with the spirtual nation which is what the scripture stated would happen.
The promises to Abraham were intended and indeed were for Christ who created the nation of priests:
Gal 3:16 Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as referring to many, but rather to one, “And to your seed,” that is, Christ.
1 Pet 2:9 But you are A CHOSEN RACE, A royal PRIESTHOOD, A HOLY NATION, A PEOPLE FOR God’s OWN POSSESSION, so that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light;
The children of the flesh were cast out in the 1st century AD:
Gal 4:30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
Gal 4:31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.
According to dispensationalism and amill "theologies" they are to be cast back in, but they again contradict scripture as usual
Luke 13:28 There shall be there the weeping and the gnashing of the teeth, when ye may see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the reign of God, and yourselves being cast out without.
The promises to Abraham were intended and indeed were for Christ who created the nation of priests:
Gal 3:16 Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as referring to many, but rather to one, “And to your seed,” that is, Christ.
1 Pet 2:9 But you are A CHOSEN RACE, A royal PRIESTHOOD, A HOLY NATION, A PEOPLE FOR God’s OWN POSSESSION, so that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light;
The children of the flesh were cast out in the 1st century AD:
Gal 4:30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
Gal 4:31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.
According to dispensationalism and amill "theologies" they are to be cast back in, but they again contradict scripture as usual
Luke 13:28 There shall be there the weeping and the gnashing of the teeth, when ye may see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the reign of God, and yourselves being cast out without.
-
1
- Show all
Yes I agree. The Jews were chosen to be the bloodline of the Messiah, the scriptures came through them, basically they were the group that God chose to relate to humanity BUT the flesh descendants were never God's elect or children of the promise.
And you're right, even those things were taken from them in the 1st century.
And you're right, even those things were taken from them in the 1st century.
-
1
- Show all
You didn't get that from the Bible. You got that from dispensational teachers. Give me one Scripture that says that. There isn't one.
Here is another big problem with your hypothesis that you should consider:
Matthew 2: 15, "Out of Egypt, I called My Son." Matthew applies this to Jesus and is quoting from Hosea 11: 1 which says, "When Israel was a child, I loved Him, and out of Egypt I called My Son."
So Matthew is telling us that Jesus is true Israel. That He IS Israel. Jesus was Jewish when He was here on earth, right?
The prophecy of Daniel 9: 24 says, "Seventy weeks are determined for YOUR PEOPLE..." Jesus was one of Daniel's people. He was a Jew on earth. He is the ultimate Jew. The Messiah. The deliverer of His people. He "atoned for iniquity" just like the prophecy said would happen DURING the 70 weeks.
In your dispensational system, you have the ultimate Jew, Jesus, being crucified OUTSIDE the seventy weeks time frame. In between the 69th and 70th week. You probably didn't catch that so I will say it again.
You believe that Jesus was crucified OUTSIDE the 70 week time frame that God says is specifically for Daniel's people.
You believe Jesus died on Good Friday 5 days after the 69th week ended according to your system. The Scripture refutes you. That puts Jesus OUTSIDE the 70 weeks prophecy because in your system you have broken the 70th week off and put it 2,000 years in the future and counting.
So Jesus "atoned for iniquity" OUTSIDE the seventy weeks. I hope you catch what I'm saying and how serious it is. It completely refutes dispensationalisms interpretation of the 70 weeks prophecy.
The 70th week followed the 69th week. Jesus was crucified in the middle of it just like Daniel 9: 27 says. That is after 69 weeks but still DURING the 70 weeks prophecy.
Even if you want to argue that point, you still have Jesus dying OUTSIDE the 70 week time frame.
Here is another big problem with your hypothesis that you should consider:
Matthew 2: 15, "Out of Egypt, I called My Son." Matthew applies this to Jesus and is quoting from Hosea 11: 1 which says, "When Israel was a child, I loved Him, and out of Egypt I called My Son."
So Matthew is telling us that Jesus is true Israel. That He IS Israel. Jesus was Jewish when He was here on earth, right?
The prophecy of Daniel 9: 24 says, "Seventy weeks are determined for YOUR PEOPLE..." Jesus was one of Daniel's people. He was a Jew on earth. He is the ultimate Jew. The Messiah. The deliverer of His people. He "atoned for iniquity" just like the prophecy said would happen DURING the 70 weeks.
In your dispensational system, you have the ultimate Jew, Jesus, being crucified OUTSIDE the seventy weeks time frame. In between the 69th and 70th week. You probably didn't catch that so I will say it again.
You believe that Jesus was crucified OUTSIDE the 70 week time frame that God says is specifically for Daniel's people.
You believe Jesus died on Good Friday 5 days after the 69th week ended according to your system. The Scripture refutes you. That puts Jesus OUTSIDE the 70 weeks prophecy because in your system you have broken the 70th week off and put it 2,000 years in the future and counting.
So Jesus "atoned for iniquity" OUTSIDE the seventy weeks. I hope you catch what I'm saying and how serious it is. It completely refutes dispensationalisms interpretation of the 70 weeks prophecy.
The 70th week followed the 69th week. Jesus was crucified in the middle of it just like Daniel 9: 27 says. That is after 69 weeks but still DURING the 70 weeks prophecy.
Even if you want to argue that point, you still have Jesus dying OUTSIDE the 70 week time frame.
E
Your hurting your own argument man.
1. Daniel is told, at the and (literally immediately following) the 69th week, Messiah the prince will appear.
2. We are told how messiah will come, riding on a donkey, And jerusalem is told to look for this sign.
Zechariah 9:9 [ The Coming King ] “Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your King is coming to you; He is just and having salvation, Lowly and riding on a donkey, A colt, the foal of a donkey.
We did not learn that from men, We learned it by SCRIPTURE ITSELF.
E
You did not prove anything, again yu have to get off this high horse. You gave your opinion of what you think.
You still have not responded to the things I showed which proved the kingdom age (1000 years) has or is happening, Even if you believe it is more or less than 1000 years. We have signs of what should be happening, they have yet to occure.
You still have not responded to the things I showed which proved the kingdom age (1000 years) has or is happening, Even if you believe it is more or less than 1000 years. We have signs of what should be happening, they have yet to occure.