The Virgin Porn Addict -- Why Do We Differentiate So Much Between Sins of the Heart and the Body?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Butterflyyy

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2019
1,615
1,318
113
#61
I’m sure we all agree that our hearts are desperately wicked and need to continually pray without ceasing and strengthen our armor of God, separately and together. People make excuses when their eyes are not where they should be, still makes it wrong. It takes work to keep that flame going. Do what it takes to appreciate, respect, and love each other as much as you can. Love is a choice.
Yes and it's also a command👌
 
Aug 2, 2009
24,646
4,305
113
#62
It is cheating in the heart isn't it?

God says it is sin.
Well scripture also says that hating someone is equal to murder so I'm not sure what to make of it because if that's true, then all of us are murderers and adulterers. A man (or woman) doesn't have to see porn to have impure thoughts about someone else, and who has never felt hate for someone in their entire life? No one. Unless they are a saint.
 

seoulsearch

OutWrite Trouble
May 23, 2009
16,517
5,452
113
#63
Well scripture also says that hating someone is equal to murder so I'm not sure what to make of it because if that's true, then all of us are murderers and adulterers. A man (or woman) doesn't have to see porn to have impure thoughts about someone else, and who has never felt hate for someone in their entire life? No one. Unless they are a saint.
I think that was exactly Jesus' point to people who believed they were more righteous than others -- that no one can think they've sinned less than someone else or committed less grievous sins or are somehow more holy than someone else, because all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,489
13,797
113
#64
lol I feel she's is going out flirting with other guys then that's definitely not okay; I'm trying to point out that if she was emotionally unavailable it isn't necessarily sin like lusting after another us. I also wanted to make the point that a woman may be emotionally unavailable because she is hurting, but I am not justifying it; sometimes in a marriage, its vital that there is communication and submission from both sides to each other because of loving and caring about each other. So any selfishness in whatever form and whether it's from a male or female, is wrong. Both male or female are wrong if they lust after another or are manipulative and selfish... I just think the gender is irrelevant as both are capable of sinning. Lol sorry I seemed to beat around the bush there😅
Thanks. :)

I think we are each looking at the topic from our gender's perspective, and perhaps struggling to see the other side objectively. If we take a common situation, we could each say, "It's this way because he (she) did this" and the other could say, "Yes, because she (he) did that." It's often a tangled mess of hurt and reaction that is only resolved with grace, repentance, and forgiveness. Neither gender is always at fault. An action one person takes because of their own pain might be the one that causes the most pain in the other person, even if it was not intended to cause pain.
 

KhedetOrthos

Active member
Dec 13, 2019
284
158
43
#65
Hey Everyone,

Over the years on CC, there have been times when someone will post a thread that says something like this: "I'm a virgin, and I'm looking for a virgin, and only a virgin to marry, but unfortunately, the rest of you weak, sinful people have all given into temptation and are making it impossible for me to find my special someone!"

I want to add a disclaimer right of the bat that I am NOT in any way, shape, or form, criticizing anyone from EITHER camp (whether virgin or non-virgin, and for whatever reason.) I do understand that some people have a very valid point in that they are working diligently to save themselves for marriage, only to be discouraged that no one else seems to have done the same thing.

I am not saying that these feelings are wrong at all.

But a few times over the years when I've been able to talk with someone who is a virgin and upset that no one else seems to be living by the same moral standard as they do, it will be disclosed that the person actually IS experimenting with and expressing their sexuality through pornography (and I'm not condemning anyone because we are almost all exposed to porn in one way or the other, seeing as today's ads and television shows would have been considered pornographic in the past.)

Rather, my interest in this thread is when a person is a virgin and is angry that they can't find another virgin to marry, and thinks it's terrible that "everyone else is out there doing it", but fulfills their own desires and curiosities through various "at home" medias.

In other words, there seems to be clear distinction between those who are sinning physically, maybe with several people, and those who are sinning spiritually, maybe with thousands of other people (via imagination) through the various things they have read/seen/been exposed to, purposely or not. (And of course, I realize that non-virgins fight this battle just as much.)

The questions I had in mind for this discussion are:

* Why is there a clear distinction between a physical sin and a sin of the heart, when Jesus said that looking at someone lustfully is all-out sin, because as a matter of the heart, the deed is already done? (Matthew 5:28.)

* I understand that the person who sins physically is putting themselves in a different situation with additional dangers, such as STD's and an unplanned pregnancy, but if sin is truly sin, why do those who sin in the flesh seem to be seen as "more guilty" than those who have sinned via print, computer, or any other media?

* Is it because the person who sins both in mind and body has fallen on two different fronts (mental and physical), and the person who fails "alone" has "only" sinned in mind, but not with another physical person?

Again, this thread is NOT meant to condemn anyone in any way, but rather to explore our own biases in how we categorize sin and why we see some people as being "worse" sinners or committing "worse" sins than others.

I'm guessing there is a wide variety of answers that could be given here, and I want to invite people to discuss them in an honest way that helps us both learn and empathize with each other instead of putting others down.

God bless, and thank you for your thoughts! :)
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. I am not there to stand as judge over the past of someone I meet.
 

Lanolin

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2018
23,460
7,188
113
#66
Hey Everyone,

Over the years on CC, there have been times when someone will post a thread that says something like this: "I'm a virgin, and I'm looking for a virgin, and only a virgin to marry, but unfortunately, the rest of you weak, sinful people have all given into temptation and are making it impossible for me to find my special someone!"

I want to add a disclaimer right of the bat that I am NOT in any way, shape, or form, criticizing anyone from EITHER camp (whether virgin or non-virgin, and for whatever reason.) I do understand that some people have a very valid point in that they are working diligently to save themselves for marriage, only to be discouraged that no one else seems to have done the same thing.

I am not saying that these feelings are wrong at all.

But a few times over the years when I've been able to talk with someone who is a virgin and upset that no one else seems to be living by the same moral standard as they do, it will be disclosed that the person actually IS experimenting with and expressing their sexuality through pornography (and I'm not condemning anyone because we are almost all exposed to porn in one way or the other, seeing as today's ads and television shows would have been considered pornographic in the past.)

Rather, my interest in this thread is when a person is a virgin and is angry that they can't find another virgin to marry, and thinks it's terrible that "everyone else is out there doing it", but fulfills their own desires and curiosities through various "at home" medias.

In other words, there seems to be clear distinction between those who are sinning physically, maybe with several people, and those who are sinning spiritually, maybe with thousands of other people (via imagination) through the various things they have read/seen/been exposed to, purposely or not. (And of course, I realize that non-virgins fight this battle just as much.)

The questions I had in mind for this discussion are:

* Why is there a clear distinction between a physical sin and a sin of the heart, when Jesus said that looking at someone lustfully is all-out sin, because as a matter of the heart, the deed is already done? (Matthew 5:28.)

* I understand that the person who sins physically is putting themselves in a different situation with additional dangers, such as STD's and an unplanned pregnancy, but if sin is truly sin, why do those who sin in the flesh seem to be seen as "more guilty" than those who have sinned via print, computer, or any other media?

* Is it because the person who sins both in mind and body has fallen on two different fronts (mental and physical), and the person who fails "alone" has "only" sinned in mind, but not with another physical person?

Again, this thread is NOT meant to condemn anyone in any way, but rather to explore our own biases in how we categorize sin and why we see some people as being "worse" sinners or committing "worse" sins than others.

I'm guessing there is a wide variety of answers that could be given here, and I want to invite people to discuss them in an honest way that helps us both learn and empathize with each other instead of putting others down.

God bless, and thank you for your thoughts! :)
not sure but Jesus didnt have much good to say about hypocrites.
all you can say to this person is dont be a hypocrite. sorry cant help you. But God can. Confess all to Him.

we must take the mote out of our own eyes before trying to take it out of someone elses. Also there is such a thing as self control which is one of the fruit of the holy spirit. I think people dont really understand this fruit and dont really know how to cultivate it, what seed to plant.
but if you dont sow, you dont reap. The very first thing peoole need to do is prepare the soil. its not good taking out the weeds but they just grow back cos you havent rooted them out properly.
You might think it looks alright on the surface but those weeds are gonna come back eventually.

I will go into more gardening tips in another post but the answer is not necessarily weed killer which will kill your soil too.
 

Butterflyyy

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2019
1,615
1,318
113
#67
Well scripture also says that hating someone is equal to murder so I'm not sure what to make of it because if that's true, then all of us are murderers and adulterers. A man (or woman) doesn't have to see porn to have impure thoughts about someone else, and who has never felt hate for someone in their entire life? No one. Unless they are a saint.
This thread is specifically about sexual sin though, and the implications/ consequences of it....and any sin ought to be repented of or it will have negative consequences.
 

Butterflyyy

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2019
1,615
1,318
113
#68
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. I am not there to stand as judge over the past of someone I meet.
We are not casting stones; we are discussing the consequences of sexual sin from a Biblical perspective.
 

Lanolin

Well-known member
Dec 15, 2018
23,460
7,188
113
#69
I think people dont understand that there is a actually a curse put on anyone who is a bastard in the OT. which is why idolatry and sexual sin were such no-nos. God wanted a pure people.

He didnt get it though as humans being human, just couldnt help themselves. Even Jesus ancestry were all these women (and men) who transgressed. Rahab and Bathsheba and Tamar even his mother Mary herself had children out of wedlock. The thing is its God who redeems us, no matter what weve done, if we ask to be forgiven.
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,066
3,415
113
#70
I think people dont understand that there is a actually a curse put on anyone who is a bastard in the OT. which is why idolatry and sexual sin were such no-nos. God wanted a pure people.

He didnt get it though as humans being human, just couldnt help themselves. Even Jesus ancestry were all these women (and men) who transgressed. Rahab and Bathsheba and Tamar even his mother Mary herself had children out of wedlock. The thing is its God who redeems us, no matter what weve done, if we ask to be forgiven.

I would love to know where in scripture you found this information.
 

Butterflyyy

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2019
1,615
1,318
113
#71
I would love to know where in scripture you found this information.
Matthew 5:28
But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
 

Butterflyyy

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2019
1,615
1,318
113
#72
I would love to know where in scripture you found this information.
Lol... are you referring to this?:

KhedetOrthos said:
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. I am not there to stand as judge over the past of someone I meet.

I quite agree....
but it got me thinking.... a Christian confided in me a couple of years back about being in this very situation... she has been a committed Christian since she was very young, and desperately wants to be a wife and mother. I was clear about Porn addiction being sin and hastened to add that we have an enemy roaming around seeking whom he may devour; but I have to say, my heart goes out to her, and I in no way see her as a Pharisee, but rather as a true Christian who has become entangled in a trap. I respect her for confiding in me and I keep her in prayer. I think Ben made a really good point when he shared that one of the reasons he fell prey to this trap in the past was fear. I do think it is very hard for Christians who are no longer in their twenties, for example, and remain chaste, having never married or had children, and are waiting on the Lord. Having said that, we all must be vigilant; being a single Christian can make us vulnerable to certain temptations of course, and it's good to be on our guard.
With love in Christ🙂
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,066
3,415
113
#73
Lol... are you referring to this?:
Actually, I was referring to the very specific post that was quoted and none other. Even more specifically, within the quoted post I placed a phrase in bold and it was to that bolded section that my question was directed.
 

cinder

Senior Member
Mar 26, 2014
4,433
2,419
113
#74
Actually, I was referring to the very specific post that was quoted and none other. Even more specifically, within the quoted post I placed a phrase in bold and it was to that bolded section that my question was directed.
But if you have a user on ignore, you don't see their posts even when another user quotes it.
 

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
Jan 15, 2011
6,066
3,415
113
#76
But if you have a user on ignore, you don't see their posts even when another user quotes it.
I never have utilized the ignore feature so that possibility never crossed my mind.

😂👍thank you... I kept thinking, ' Is it me?' Lol

I'm pretty sure it's just you. :whistle:
 

cinder

Senior Member
Mar 26, 2014
4,433
2,419
113
#77
I never have utilized the ignore feature so that possibility never crossed my mind.
Well I had the same confusion about your post and who you were addressing until I figured that out.
 

Butterflyyy

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2019
1,615
1,318
113
#78
I never have utilized the ignore feature so that possibility never crossed my mind.



I'm pretty sure it's just you. :whistle:
Man, I've been getting a bit too keen with that ignore button🤣
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,489
13,797
113
#79
Man, I've been getting a bit too keen with that ignore button🤣
The Ignore function could be useful if someone were continually interfering with your discussions, but I find that people use it to avoid dealing with reality and facing challenges to their bad ideas. Present company excepted, of course. ;)
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#80
The entire point of that passage is that mental/physical sin is a distinction without a difference. Both are equally damnable. The research being done on porn addiction leads me to believe it's comparably destructive in terms of practical consequences. A lot of Christians and even non-Christians are becoming alert to this.

Your friend may not realize it now, but if they're ever in a relationship they can trust it will take a toll. If they never end up in a relationship, it has already taken a toll.

I'll also add that there are other sins that typically accompany or spur pornographic addiction. Sloth is the big one. Idle hands are the devil's playground.

TL;DR- Sin is sin. Wax is wax.