Here is the trouble with this view of scripture. If we are the ones who are deciding what scripture says, which must be the case, because it is the infallible word of God, and has all knowledge and everything else, and all we must do is read and interpret it; then we can, with our puny little minds, decide what parts are important and which are not. Like the part about His sheep hearing His voice. He did not really mean that we are to hear His voice. But we can condemn another believer on the basis of one little part of a two sentence paragraph, contained in the last third of the last sentence, while ignoring the most important part of the paragraph, about entering into the holy place with God.
But just take one passage, the words of Jesus, and see if you can interpret them. "I am the resurrection and the life; everyone who believes in Me shall live, even if they die; and everyone who lives and believes in Me shall never die." Do you know what this means? Can you interpret this? What if you are wrong, and it means something entirely different? I mean, these are diametrically opposed statements. Live if you die, or live and never die?
This doctrine about the bible has been a part of the church for a while now. The bible is not the fault, it is the doctrine. That is what I am speaking against.