50 Reasons For a Pretribulational Rapture By Dr. John F. Walvoord

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,163
2,177
113
Jesus told some of the Pharisees, "...because you claim that you can see, your guilt remains." in the last verse of John 9 and then He goes straightway into His explanation of the Good Shepherd in Chapter 10. This caused me to wonder if sheep were blind and, after a quick google, I find a claim that sheep have poor depth perception and have a tendency to move out of the dark and into well-lit areas but they do have an excellent sense of smell and sensitive hearing.
...I should include what I had omitted concerning sheep, deciding that it also might add to a better understanding between sheep, especially on the part that they prefer to move uphill when disturbed and their excellent peripheral vision of 270-320 degrees...( search terms: are sheep blind, "Goats and Sheep," answers.com)
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
The Rapture is boilerplate doctrine buddy.
Just a point: we're brothers, not buddies.

As to YOUR VERSION of the rapture, it isn't even found in Scripture.

I have yet to hear anything that even comes close to undermining this doctrine.
Then why aren't you taking on my challenge: quote 2 Thess 2:1 and put whatever words in parenthesis what you think "coming" and "gathering" means, like I did.

Nothing you have stated this far has had any erosive effect whatsoever.
Well, those who have closed their eyes and stopped up their ears sure won't be effected.

On the contrary you have dusted it off and made it more gleaming and refulgent in glory.......:D
This is funny. :)
 
Jan 31, 2021
8,658
1,064
113
"Parallel" you say?.....o_O:ROFL::LOL:
Yes, that's what I said. Do you or any other pretribber have any parallel examples of a rapture?

Of course you don't. So just go ahead and take my challenge and quote 2 Thess 2:1 and put in parenthesis what "coming" and "gathering" mean to you.

Then I'll know WHY you reject that verse as showing that the rapture occurs AFTER the Trib. Because I'm curious.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
The time of the Two Witnesses coincides with the Trumpet Events - because, the Two Witnesses cause them to come about.

They will be hear to Save ISREAL.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,113
113
I am unable to read that post.
Fine.




Let the readers note, the posts I referenced say the following:

[quoting from posts]

Post #1102 (pg 56 of this thread) quoting from Post #607 different thread:

re: Heb9:28 - [excerpt] - "ALL TEN TIMES that "G3708 - APPEAR [passive]" occurs (re: Jesus), ALL TEN of them refer to the time-period FOLLOWING His Resurrection! ;) "



...and quoting from that Post #607 (re: Heb9:28):

"Show me anywhere in Scripture that the "G3708 - APPEAR [passive]" (re: Him) speaks of anything BEFORE His DEATH/CROSS...
It doesn't. ALL TEN TIMES that "G3708 - APPEAR [passive]" occurs (re: Jesus), ALL TEN of them refer to the time-period FOLLOWING His Resurrection! ;) "



...and quoting further from Post #1106 (also pg 56 of this thread) that I'd also mentioned:

"Well, for one thing... in each of those TEN REFERENCES (used re: Jesus) to the word "APPEAR [passive - G3708]" (as is used in Heb9:28)...
... ALL TEN of them refer to what took place FOLLOWING His resurrection (NONE refer to His earthly ministry BEFORE His death, what we commonly call His "FIRST ADVENT"<--NONE of them refer to that)... and IN NONE OF THOSE passages does it refer to anything like "OPENLY MANIFEST TO/BEFORE ALL," but rather, ONLY to those carefully chosen witnesses... (Acts 10:41)..."


[end quoting from old posts]
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
You do know that KJV was only a Paraphrase of the 5 earlier English Bible translations, WITH KNOW ERRORS.

It was done to update English language and to correct the Known Errors. They did not go to the original language translations,
they relieved on paraphrasing the older English languages, and in problem verses referred the Greek Septuagint and the Latin Bible.

Here is the link to the ORIGINAL 1611 KJV PREFACE:

https://www.ccel.org/bible/kjv/preface/pref1.htm


Here is an excerpt:

The Translators To The Reader

Zeale to promote the common good, whether it be by devising any thing our selves, or revising that which hath bene laboured by others, . . .
. . .
But how shall men meditate in that, which they cannot understand? How shall they understand that which is kept close in an unknowen tongue? . . . so lest the Church be driven to the like exigent, it is necessary to have translations in a readinesse. . .
. . .
Yet it seemed good to the holy Ghost and to them, to take that which they found, (the same being for the greatest part true and sufficient) rather then by making a new, in that new world and greene age of the Church, to expose themselves to many exceptions and cavillations, as though they made a Translation to serve their owne turne, and therefore bearing witnesse to themselves, their witnesse not to be regarded. This may be supposed to bee some cause, why the Translation of the Seventie was allowed to passe for currant. . . . he holdeth the Authours thereof not onely for Interpreters, but also for Prophets in some respect: and Justinian the Emperour enjoyning the Jewes his subjects to use specially the Translation of the Seventie, rendreth this reason thereof, because they were as it were enlighted with propheticall grace. . . .
. . . This is the translation of the Seventy Interpreters, com- monly so called, which prepared the way for our Saviour among the Gen- tiles by written ERRORS preaching . . . It is certain, that that Translation was not so sound and so perfect, but it needed in many places correc- tion; . . . {KNOWN in the Septuagint} . . . (and Saint Jerome affirmeth as much) that the Seventie were Interpreters, they were not Prophets; they did many things well, as learned men; but yet as men they stumbled and fell, one while through oversight, another while through ignorance, yea, sometimes they may be noted to adde to the Originall, and sometimes to take from it; which made the Apostles to leave them many times, when they left the Hebrew, and to deliver the sence thereof according to the trueth of the word, as the spirit gave them utterance. This may suffice touching the Greeke Translations of the old Testament. . . .
. . . But now the Latin Translations were too many to be all good, for they were infinite (Latini Interprets nullo modo numerari possunt, saith S. Augustine.) [S. Augustin. de doctr. Christ. lib 2 cap II]. Again they were not out of the Hebrew fountain (we speak of the Latin Translations of the Old Testament) but out of the Greek stream, therefore the Greek being not altogether clear, the Latin derived from it must needs be muddy. . . .
There were also within a few hundreth yeeres after CHRIST, translations many into the Latine tongue: for this tongue also was very fit to convey the Law and the Gospel by, because in those times very many Countreys of the West, yea of the South, East and North, spake or understood Latine, being made Provinces to the Romanes. But now the Latine Translations were too many to be all good, . . . Now the Church of Rome . . . Yea, so unwilling they are to communicate the Scriptures to the peoples understanding in any sort, that they are not ashamed to confesse, that wee forced them to translate it into English against their wills. . . .
. . .
. . .
. . . the same will shine as gold more brightly, being rubbed and polished; also, if anything be halting, or superfluous, or not so agreeable to the original, the same may be corrected, and the truth set in place. {KNOWN ERRORS} . . .
Yet for all that, as nothing is begun and perfited at the same time, and the later thoughts are thought to be the wiser: so, if we building upon their foundation that went before us, and being holpen by their labours, doe endevour to make that better which they left so good; no man, we are sure, hath cause to mislike us; they, we persuade our selves, if they were alive, would thanke us. . . .
. . .
to have the translations of the Bible maturely considered of and examined. For by this meanes it commeth to passe, that whatsoever is sound alreadie (and all is sound for substance, in one or other of our editions, and the worst of ours farre better then their autentike vulgar) the same will shine as gold more brightly, being rubbed and polished; also if any thing be halting, or superfluous, or not so agreeable to the originall, the same may bee corrected, and the trueth set in place. . . .
. . .
Now to the later we answere; that wee doe not deny, nay wee affirme and avow, that the very meanest {poorest} translation of the Bible in English, set foorth by men of our profession (for wee have seene none of theirs of the whole Bible as yet) containeth the word of God, nay, is the word of God. . . .
. . .
Yet before we end, we must answere a third cavill and objection of theirs against us, for altering and amending our Translations [sic] so oft; wherein truely they deale hardly, and strangely with us. { The very same thing you do to MODERN Translations. } For to whom ever was it imputed for a fault (by such as were wise) to goe over that which hee had done, and to amend it where he saw cause? . . .
. . .
But the difference that appeareth betweene our Translations, and our often correcting of them, is the thing that wee are specially charged with; let us see therefore whether they themselves bee without fault this way, (if it be to be counted a fault, to correct) and whether they bee fit men to throw stones at us: But it is high time to leave them, and to shew in briefe what wee proposed to our selves, and what course we held in this our perusall and survay of the Bible. Truly (good Christian Reader) wee never thought from the beginning, that we should neede to make a new Translation, nor yet to make of a bad one a good one, (for then the imputation of Sixtus had bene true in some sort, that our people had bene fed with gall of Dragons in stead of wine, with whey in stead of milke, but to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one principall good one, not justly to be excepted against; that hath bene our indeavour, that our marke. . . .

{That makes it a PARAPHRASE and not an actual Translation from the original languages.}

THAT IS THE ORIGINAL PREFACE, authored by the translation team. Go to a USED Old Book Store and find one that is old enough to have the ORIGINAL PREFACE in it.. King James Only believer reprinted it with an CHANGED PREFACE. I Wonder Why? Could the ORIGINAL Disprove the THEORY that KING JAMES ONLY believers want people to BELIEVE, that: King James Version is the only GOD Inspired Translation to the English Language in the WORLD.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
circa 70 A.D.

The word 'end' is not referring to "the end of time"...


Armageddon


Armageddon

NOW YOU HAVE ADDED YOUR OWN TWIST TO THE SCRIPTURES, AND THAT IS forbidden.

Proverbs 30:6 (HCSB)
6 Don’t add to His words, or He will rebuke you, and you will be proved a liar.


IT SPECIFICALLY SAYS:

Daniel 9:26 (ASV)
26 And after the threescore and two weeks shall the anointed one be cut off, and shall have nothing: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and even unto the end shall be war; desolations are determined.

Daniel 9:26 (NCV)
26 After the four hundred thirty-four years the appointed leader will be killed; he will have nothing. The people of the leader who is to come will destroy the city and the holy place. The end of the city will come like a flood, and war will continue until the end. God has ordered that place to be completely destroyed.

Daniel 9:26 (TLB)
26 "After this period of 434 years, the Anointed One will be killed, his kingdom still unrealized... and a king will arise whose armies will destroy the city and the Temple. They will be overwhelmed as with a flood, and war and its miseries are decreed from that time to the very end.

Daniel 9:26 (NJB)
26 And after the sixty-two weeks an Anointed One put to death without his . . . city and sanctuary ruined by a prince who is to come. The end of that prince will be catastrophe and, until the end, there will be war and all the devastation decreed.

Daniel 9:26 (YLT)
26 And after the sixty and two weeks, cut off is Messiah, and the city and the holy place are not his, the Leader who hath come doth destroy the people; and its end is with a flood, and till the end is war, determined are desolations.

Daniel 9:26 (NIV)
26 After the sixty-two 'sevens,' the Anointed One will be cut off and will have nothing. The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood: War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed.

Daniel 9:26 (HCSB)
26 After those 62 weeks the Messiah will be cut off and will have nothing. The people of the coming prince will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come with a flood, and until the end there will be war; desolations are decreed.

Daniel 9:26 (NASB)
26 "Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. And its end will come with a flood; even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined.

QUOTE:
And till the end of the war desolations are determined. From that time on, the history of the city would be one of war and destruction. The end here means the end of the times of the Gentiles.

Believer's Bible Commentary: A Thorough, Yet Easy-to-Read Bible Commentary That Turns Complicated Theology Into Practical Understanding.

QUOTE:
would continue until the end.
Even though Israel was to be set aside, she would continue to suffer until the prophecies of the 70 "sevens" were completely fulfilled. Her sufferings span the entire period from the destruction of Jerusalem in a.d. 70 to Jerusalem's deliverance from Gentile dominion at the Second Advent of Christ.

The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures by Dallas Seminary Faculty.


Now in J. Vernon McGee's commentary, are SEVERAL OTHER THINGS that must be accomplished during the 70 Weeks prophesy:


QUOTE:
We will see as we progress in our study that sixty-nine of those "weeks" have already passed, and one "week" is yet to be fulfilled.

Here are the six things to be accomplished:

1. "To finish the transgression." This refers to the transgression of Israel. The cross provided the redemption for sin -- for the sin of the nation, but not all accepted it. Today the word has gone out to the ends of the earth that there is a redemption for mankind. But in that last "week" we are told that God says, "And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications..." (Zech. 12:10). And in Zechariah 13:1: "In that day there shall be a fountain opened to the house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness." That has not been opened yet. All you have to do is to look at the land of Israel and you will know this has not been fulfilled.

2. "To make an end of sins." The national sins of Israel will come to an end at the second coming of Christ. They are just like any other people or any other nation. They are sinners as individuals and as a nation. They have made many mistakes as a nation (so have we), but God will make an end to that.

3. "To make reconciliation for iniquity." During this period of Seventy Weeks, God has provided a redemption through the death and resurrection of Christ. This, of course, is for Jew and Gentile alike.

4. "And to bring in everlasting righteousness" refers to the return of Christ at the end of the 490 years to establish the Kingdom.

5. "To seal up the vision and prophecy" means that all will be fulfilled, which will vindicate this prophecy as well as all other prophecies in Scripture.

6. "To anoint the most Holy" has reference to the anointing of the holy of holies in the millennial temple about which Ezekiel spoke (Ezek. 41 -- Ezek. 46).

Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate [Dan. 9:25-27].

Thru The Bible with J. Vernon McGee.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,113
113
...and quoting further from Post #1106 (also pg 56 of this thread) that I'd also mentioned:

"Well, for one thing... in each of those TEN REFERENCES (used re: Jesus) to the word "APPEAR [passive - G3708]" (as is used in Heb9:28)...
... ALL TEN of them refer to what took place FOLLOWING His resurrection (NONE refer to His earthly ministry BEFORE His death, what we commonly call His "FIRST ADVENT"<--NONE of them refer to that)... and IN NONE OF THOSE passages does it refer to anything like "OPENLY MANIFEST TO/BEFORE ALL," but rather, ONLY to those carefully chosen witnesses... (Acts 10:41)..."
And P.S. out of those TEN REFERENCES ^ , exactly HALF of them (5x) speak of His having appeared to Paul from His position UP IN HEAVEN; examples: Acts 26:16 and 1 Corinthians 15:8... meaning, it did not require Jesus' EXIT out from Heaven in order to occur.


--Acts 26:16 - "But rise up and stand on your feet. For I have appeared [G3708 - passive] to you [Paul] for this purpose, to appoint you a servant and a witness both of that which ..."
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,113
113
--1Cor15:8 - "And last of all, He appeared [G3708 - passive] also to me [Paul], as to one of untimely birth."
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
1,600 furlongs is the linear distance between Bozrah/Petra and Jerusalem. That is the phenomenon that's taking place here.......Jesus wiping out the columns of armies coming to the refuge of Petra to destroy Israel.

Blood coming up to the horses bridles will occur in the wadis/gullies. Not necessarily everywhere in the fields.

I don't think too many people understand these matters. When you do it all makes perfect sense, And there is absolutely no need whatsoever for the ridiculous allegorization so heavily promoted by the addled Augustin-ites. And yes totally agree it is to be taken literally......(y)



IF IT IS PETRA WHERE THE 144,000 Flee to. With an earthquake that splits Mount of Olives, it could be an entirely newly formed place.
Besides the Petra, is south southeast of Jerusalem.

They are not coming to wipe out the 144,000. They are coming to STOP CHRIST from returning.

Revelation 19:19 (NASB)
19 And I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies assembled to make war against Him
who sat on the horse
and against His army.

This rider on a white Horse:

Revelation 19:11 (NASB)
11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse, and He who sat on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and wages war.

Revelation 19:16 (NASB)
16 And on His robe and on His thigh He has a name written, "KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS."
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,034
8,375
113



IF IT IS PETRA WHERE THE 144,000 Flee to. With an earthquake that splits Mount of Olives, it could be an entirely newly formed place.
Besides the Petra, is south southeast of Jerusalem.

They are not coming to wipe out the 144,000. They are coming to STOP CHRIST from returning.

Revelation 19:19 (NASB)
19 And I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies assembled to make war against Him
who sat on the horse
and against His army.

This rider on a white Horse:

Revelation 19:11 (NASB)
11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse, and He who sat on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and wages war.

Revelation 19:16 (NASB)
16 And on His robe and on His thigh He has a name written, "KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS."
You don't need me to quote Scripture but it's very clear that Israel is ensconced in a refuge. Probably Petra. Borzah is clearly mentioned in Jer 49:22 and Isa 63:1 and speaks both to war and protection on the behalf of Israel.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,034
8,375
113
And P.S. out of those TEN REFERENCES ^ , exactly HALF of them (5x) speak of His having appeared to Paul from His position UP IN HEAVEN; examples: Acts 26:16 and 1 Corinthians 15:8... meaning, it did not require Jesus' EXIT out from Heaven in order to occur.


--Acts 26:16 - "But rise up and stand on your feet. For I have appeared [G3708 - passive] to you [Paul] for this purpose, to appoint you a servant and a witness both of that which ..."
Wow. Now that WAS interesting.....:)
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,835
4,321
113
mywebsite.us
if you see that it works a certain way, then you can attempt to understand the mechanism within it.
This is what I mean by reverse-engineer.
Okay.

At least once one understands that the 70th week has been fulfilled
long ago, one avoids the manifold absurdities of futurism.
Yes.

Thank you for your advice on forward understanding. Ok, we leave the simple stuff as you are beyond
that and we go on.
What I meant by saying that - more than anything else - is that our understanding should start with the 'grammar of the language' and the simple meaning of what it is actually saying.

The "manifold absurdities of futurism" (as you put it) exist because people try to "engineer" the meaning - reverse, sideways, whatever - instead of simply allowing scripture to explain itself.

The 490 year prophecy is not de facto a Messianic prophecy, as it would seem most people assume.
It is actually a prophecy about Israel and Jerusalem. It is important to understand that.
If it is a prophecy just about Jesus then you can interpret it the way you and all the schools of
teaching seem to do. Jesus came - end of prophecy.
The prophecy is about what God [had] appointed for Israel. And, in particular, the end of the 'Times of the Jews'.

It is not about anything else. It does not "go beyond" into the End Times Scenario.

However, because of the covenant - God includes information about the First Coming of Christ - which is intrinsic to the "conclusion" of the 'Times of the Jews'.

So in Daniel 9, Gabriel gives Daniel a prophecy about Israel, not about the Messiah per se.
That is not to say Jesus is not imputed in the prophecy, just that the prophecy is directed to Israel and Jerusalem.
The prophecy is about the transition of:

~ Old Covenant to New Covenant

~ 'Times of the Jews' to 'Times of the Gentiles'

In time-and-event terms, the prophecy is 100% fulfilled.

Transition complete.

While it makes mention of events occurring after the end of the 490 years (i.e. - 70 A.D.), the end of the prophetic 490 years was in 34 A.D.

Christ was crucified in the middle of the 70th week.

The end of the 70th week - and 490 years - was the time of transition from the 'Times of the Jews' to the 'Times of the Gentiles.

This was around the time Stephen was stoned and Paul started his ministry to the Gentiles.
 
Oct 23, 2020
971
164
43
Okay.


Yes.


What I meant by saying that - more than anything else - is that our understanding should start with the 'grammar of the language' and the simple meaning of what it is actually saying.

The "manifold absurdities of futurism" (as you put it) exist because people try to "engineer" the meaning - reverse, sideways, whatever - instead of simply allowing scripture to explain itself.


The prophecy is about what God [had] appointed for Israel. And, in particular, the end of the 'Times of the Jews'.

It is not about anything else. It does not "go beyond" into the End Times Scenario.

However, because of the covenant - God includes information about the First Coming of Christ - which is intrinsic to the "conclusion" of the 'Times of the Jews'.


The prophecy is about the transition of:

~ Old Covenant to New Covenant

~ 'Times of the Jews' to 'Times of the Gentiles'

In time-and-event terms, the prophecy is 100% fulfilled.

Transition complete.

While it makes mention of events occurring after the end of the 490 years (i.e. - 70 A.D.), the end of the prophetic 490 years was in 34 A.D.

Christ was crucified in the middle of the 70th week.

The end of the 70th week - and 490 years - was the time of transition from the 'Times of the Jews' to the 'Times of the Gentiles.

This was around the time Stephen was stoned and Paul started his ministry to the Gentiles.
Ya - I think we will have to agree to disagree, although we agree significantly also.

i expressed myself clumsily.
People try to project onto Daniel 9 what they want to see, but actually you simply have to let the
prophecy speak for itself. Verses 26-27 describe in exact detail the destruction of Jerusalem.
Nobody incidentally has refuted what i wrote previously,

It is very important in my view to understand when Prophecy has been fulfilled, because after all,
failure to do so has resulted in the rejection of Christ, and provides the rational basis for a coming AntiChrist.

AS I said- nobody has refuted what i wrote - they all just carry on with their Futurist tribulation twaddle.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,835
4,321
113
mywebsite.us
No offense to your wedsite, but rather than wade throughyour chart, please explain how the Trib can end before ALL of the judgments of God have been completed?

First there are 7 seals, then 7 trumpets, and finally 7 vials/bowls.

It seems you believe that the Trib is over afrter the 7 seals. Yet, there's 2 more sets of 7 judgments each to occur.
Do not confuse the terms:

~ tribulation
~ judgment
~ wrath

The "explanation" in/of the chart is in/with the alignment of verses of scripture according to context and chronology.

You would do well to examine the chart. (That is what it is there for.)

If you examine the scriptures with this goal in mind:

~ What happens before what?
~ What happens after what?
~ What happens at the same time as what?

- then, the scriptures may be arranged in 'event' order.

This is the way the chart is arranged, and how the arrangement is determined.

It is in 'event' order.

And, if you will pay close attention to the 'detail', you will discover that the Bible defines some things differently than you were taught to believe.

As an example, the Bible does not define the 'Great Tribulation' [period] like most people tend to think.

If you look at it in 'event' terms according to the three questions listed above - and, based on how Jesus defines/describes it - you should discover that it does not align with 'seals', 'trumpets', 'vials', etc. like you want to believe.

As a case in point, the 'Great Tribulation' does not include-and-contain the 'seals', 'trumpets', and 'vials' within it.

In 'event' terms, the 'trumpets' and 'vials' are entirely outside of (and, after) the 'Great Tribulation'.

Just because something is a judgment - or, "is [experientially] bad" - does not mean it is part of the 'tribulation' [period].

Take the time - make the effort - examine the chart.

It will save me having to write 100 paragraphs... :cool: (y)
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,835
4,321
113
mywebsite.us
Verses 26-27 describe in exact detail the destruction of Jerusalem.
I will agree that parts of those two verses make reference to the events of circa 70 A.D.

v26 - after the colon
v27 - after the word 'cease'
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,835
4,321
113
mywebsite.us
QUOTE:
And till the end of the war desolations are determined. From that time on, the history of the city would be one of war and destruction. The end here means the end of the times of the Gentiles.
No, it's referring to the [end of the] war that commenced and continued after the seige circa 70 A.D.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
No, it's referring to the [end of the] war that commenced and continued after the seige circa 70 A.D.

In your dreams, it clearly is after the Rapture, and after the Seventieth week of Daniel in the future commences. You did not even read the 6 points by J. Vernon McGee on future events that fulfill the 70 Week Prophecies, DID YOU?
 
Oct 23, 2020
971
164
43
I will agree that parts of those two verses make reference to the events of circa 70 A.D.

v26 - after the colon
v27 - after the word 'cease'
I don't really like posting here when I cannot express myself with 100% clarity, as the ethos here is not one of open discussion and a learning environment, but rather one of one-upmanship, theological badger-baiting and a carnal war to the death mentality.
However....

The translations all differ, but the gist is that 'after 62 (69 in effect) weeks the Anointed One is cut off.....'
Some translations simply replace the Anointed One with the Messiah.

Both the Church and the Temple are 'An Anointed One'.

After 69 weeks the Church and the temple system are entirely separated.
This is exactly as Jesus prophesied, and fulfills the requirements Abrahamic Covenant:

14 And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,835
4,321
113
mywebsite.us
The description of what occurs "Immediately after the tribulation of those days" in Matthew 24:29 is the Trumpet Events.
The time of the Two Witnesses coincides with the Trumpet Events - because, the Two Witnesses cause them to come about.
Go look at the chart/table on the web page linked to in post #3842.

Put two and two together.

Look closely...

Who kills the Two Witnesses?

Where did they come from?

Could/Would they ascend out of the bottomless pit before it was opened?

Of course not.

Would you say the Two Winesses are killed at some point in time after Trumpet 5 is initiated?

( Just nod your head up and down and say 'yes'. )

Would you say the prophecy and testimony of the Two Witnesses occurred before that time?

( Just nod your head up and down and say 'yes'. )

2 + 2 = 4
Did all of this make sense?