I can't view the video, but I remember when the hysteria about fat in the diet began. People were generally about the normal weight then. Since fat became "evil", obesity has become a major issue. Clever marketing jumped on the ignorance bandwagon and suddenly everything was low or fat free. Now the "experts" are saying that they got it wrong. Of course they did. Fat is not the villain. Sugar is. It's just calories with no nutritional value.
As is often the case, an element of truth, a dash of hogwash, exaggeration and speculation. For sure sugar is nowhere near as addictive as cocaine or heroin.I've heard that sugar is one of the most addictive substances on the planet. They have even gone so far as to equate it with cocaine (the other white substance) heroin, and nicotine. That's saying a lot on HOW bad the stuff is to actually ingest as it destroys your body slowly over time. I don't need to mention all the health issues that come next. Yikes! Oh! and don't forget about HFCS (high fructose corn syrup)!
Your conclusions may be based on inadequate information!!!!! Perhaps you are situated better than me as I am primarily relying on Wikipedia at this time. You are showing no references. I was recently looking at Wikipedia regarding one of the newer artificial sweeteners, unfortunately I did not bookmark the reference, and the Wiki article or another article it referenced stated something to the effect of 'sugar', derived from cane I believe and no certainty as to whether or not this would include 'sugar' derived from beets, is an inflammatory 'substance'. The article also stated that 'honey' is NOT inflammatory. In my own personal use of both sugar and honey I sense there is merit to this claim and feel that it would warrant legitimate further research if not already done.Sugar is not bad for you....nothing that tastes that good can be all that bad.
John the Baptist ate locust and wild honey....half his diet was sugar.
And the varying lobbies all fund research to claim competitors are bad for you. Saccharine does sugar research, sugar does Saccharine research. Both do corn syrup research with outcomes already determined before they get there.
link about honey.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807510/#:~:text=Honey has been suggested as,of inflammatory mediators such as don't pay attention to link title open and see for yourself.Your conclusions may be based on inadequate information!!!!! Perhaps you are situated better than me as I am primarily relying on Wikipedia at this time. You are showing no references. I was recently looking at Wikipedia regarding one of the newer artificial sweeteners, unfortunately I did not bookmark the reference, and the Wiki article or another article it referenced stated something to the effect of 'sugar', derived from cane I believe and no certainty as to whether or not this would include 'sugar' derived from beets, is an inflammatory 'substance'. The article also stated that 'honey' is NOT inflammatory. In my own personal use of both sugar and honey I sense there is merit to this claim and feel that it would warrant legitimate further research if not already done.
Here are links about sugar.link about honey.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7807510/#:~:text=Honey has been suggested as,of inflammatory mediators such as don't pay attention to link title open and see for yourself.
Sugar is not bad for you....nothing that tastes that good can be all that bad.
John the Baptist ate locust and wild honey....half his diet was sugar.
And the varying lobbies all fund research to claim competitors are bad for you. Saccharine does sugar research, sugar does Saccharine research. Both do corn syrup research with outcomes already determined before they get there.
You are exactly right. Good instinct. God put sugar in fruit and honey for a reason. Our cells run almost directly on sugar. Low carb diets spike stress hormones cause the body's fat burning mode is directly driven by cortisol (stress hormone). This is why people feel energy (burst of stress hormones!) on low carb, but it's not such a good idea long term. I encourage anyone looking for more info to look up Dr. Ray Peat PhD.
But I 100% agree that fat, specifically saturated fat, shouldn't be demonized either. I also think we should avoid junk food, but it's probably not clean sugar that's the issue, and definitely not carbs. People ate MORE carbs 100 years ago than they do today and there was far less degenerative disease then.
I'm trying to be helpfulI hope im not wrecking anyone's hope. But i nthe long run it's good to know what's really going on. I wouldn't recommend low carb. Yes you can lose fat, but I personally know people that have had low thyroid symptoms from it and low energy. In fact, it happened to me... And this is a predictable result. Carbs are needed for the thyroid.
You can look up a paper by Kyle Mamounis PhD if you want more info on the stress hormone thing.
Diabetes is a serious disease. When I visit a diabetic in a hospital or nursing home, there are always foods and beverages that cause insulin dumps and pancreas damage.