I know you were inviting
post-tribbers to comment. I hope you don't mind that I watched your video (twice!!), even though I'm a
pre-tribber.
Even though I obviously DISAGREE with her take on it, I will say that I can agree with a couple parts of what she said:
--(at the 2:53-2:58-min mark) she says, "Jesus specifically says so shall the coming of the Son of man be, it doesn't say the pretribulation rapture"
RIGHT[!], because
this text (and context) is all about Jesus' Second Coming
TO THE EARTH, FOR the promised and prophesied EARTHLY Millennial Kingdom age (as
ALL "
Son of man cometh / coming / shall come / etc" speak to [His
earthly designation], as I've been pointing out);
(so... is she saying she does NOT believe we [
'the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY'] will be "G726 - SNATCHed -
harpagēsometha" ? Can she even identify "the Church WHICH IS HIS BODY" in Scripture?);
--(at the 3:36-3:40-min mark) she says, "He didn't say pre-tribulation, Jesus does not
return before the tribulation, only after the tribulation"
... which
"RETURN" word (as used in Scripture) speaks of the following (His Second Coming
TO THE EARTH):
... "when he will
RETURN FROM the wedding..."
THEN "the meal [G347]"
- Luke 12:36-37,38,40,42-44,45-48 (PARALLEL Matt24:42-51!);
[and]
...
"RETURN" Luke 19:12,15,17,19 (PARALLEL Matt25:14-30) - when He will deal out responsibilities having to do with "have thou authority over TEN CITIES" and "over FIVE CITIES" (note "CITIES" are ON THE EARTH)... etc...
... these ^ are NOT "RAPTURE" contexts.
So EVEN we "pre-tribbers" AGREE that "JESUS DOES NOT
'RETURN' BEFORE THE TRIBULATION" because these "RETURN" passages speak specifically regarding His Second Coming ['RETURN']
TO THE EARTH--She should learn to use words biblically... (meaning, the way they are used in the Bible--ALL OF US AGREE He will "RETURN" [to the earth] at Rev19 His Second Coming
TO THE EARTH time-slot.
Pre-tribbers are not claiming He
"RETURNS" (
to the earth) at the time of "
our Rapture [
IN THE AIR]"... at least not ones who are careful with their words.
Many other of her points I've already addressed in numerous past posts / threads.
She sounds as though she has never sat under good solid teaching. I find that rather unfortunate.
That's my 2 cents, regarding what she says in her video you posted.
(every one of her points has been addressed in numerous past posts--she's not made any new points that other post-tribbers haven't already said [...and, likewise, been corrected about, lol])