Understanding God’s election

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

lrs68

Active member
Dec 30, 2024
836
229
43
But God did not decree (ordain) that all men live for Him! If God had ordained that, then all would be saved.
Nothing in the Bible makes such a claim. God said He didn't want anyone to perish. By that statement from God it's safe to believe He did ordain all humans to live for Him.
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,079
677
113
But human will always take a back seat to God's will. The human will is as depraved as the human heart is. There is no intrinsic spiritual soundness in the sons of men. Is there any physical soundness to the wills of physically dead men?
Ultimately but not in every way. I don't want to debate election, but if God wills that all be saved, and not all are saved, then in a sense God's will has taken a back seat to man's will. Stated differently, God has willingly honored the will of the creature He created to have a will. And God's seemingly obvious ultimate will to have a willingly, faithfully obedient, loving family for His perfect first-born Son takes a back seat to no one and nothing. There's always some dimensional reasoning involved in these things.
 

BillyBob

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2023
586
274
63
Texas
Every person was meant by God to be born and to live for God. Sadly, most have rejected God like Romans 1 claims. Romans 1 claims God has manifested Himself to those who reject Him but they deny that He is God.

19 because that which is known of God is manifest in them; for God manifested it unto them.
If God foreordains something – it will surely come to pass. He does not foreordain something to go either way. So, we are either foreordained to be saved, or we are foreordained to be condemned – it cannot be both. Therefore, if we are foreordained to be saved, we don't choose – God Chose.
Maybe you mean that we are not foreordained.
 

lrs68

Active member
Dec 30, 2024
836
229
43
If God foreordains something – it will surely come to pass. He does not foreordain something to go either way. So, we are either foreordained to be saved, or we are foreordained to be condemned – it cannot be both. Therefore, if we are foreordained to be saved, we don't choose – God Chose.
Maybe you mean that we are not foreordained.
He foreordained that people would be saved by Jesus.
That doesn't mean everyone will accept Jesus but they are still foreordained that if they become saved it will only be through Jesus.
 

lrs68

Active member
Dec 30, 2024
836
229
43
You don't foreordain something to go either way! Well, maybe you would but I don't think God would.
God foreordained that people are only saved by the works of Jesus.
That means anyone who is or becomes saved can only do it by the works of Jesus.
 

Rufus

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2024
4,261
574
113
Nothing in the Bible makes such a claim. God said He didn't want anyone to perish. By that statement from God it's safe to believe He did ordain all humans to live for Him.
2Pet 3:9, to which you are alluding, does NOT say what you claim! You are ignoring the context of the passage. Was the world the original audience to Peter's 2nd Epistle?
 

lrs68

Active member
Dec 30, 2024
836
229
43
2Pet 3:9, to which you are alluding, does NOT say what you claim! You are ignoring the context of the passage. Was the world the original audience to Peter's 2nd Epistle?
Peter wrote to the Jews.

But the scripture reference doesn't speak about foreordainment.
 

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
15,366
6,247
113
Please explain how God is not morally culpable for the murder of his only Begotten Son, according to this passage:

Acts 4:23-28
23 On their release, Peter and John went back to their own people and reported all that the chief priests and elders had said to them. 24 When they heard this, they raised their voices together in prayer to God. "Sovereign Lord," they said, "you made the heaven and the earth and the sea, and everything in them. 25 You spoke by the Holy Spirit through the mouth of your servant, our father David:


"'Why do the nations rage
and the peoples plot in vain?
26 The kings of the earth take their stand
and the rulers gather together
against the Lord
and against his Anointed One.'


27 Indeed Herod and Pontius Pilate met together with the Gentiles and the people of Israel in this city to conspire against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed. 28 They did what your power and will had decided beforehand should happen.
NIV

If you need help in explaining this, feel free to consult with the smarty pants on this thread such as Studier or PT. After all, they were both smart and intelligent enough to embrace the Christian faith which they think is what makes the difference between them and the stupid people of the world who reject the truth. So...with all these smarts they have, they should be able explain how God isn't morally culpable even though His hand was in everything pertaining to Christ's life, ministry, death and resurrection -- just like it was in Joseph's life in the OT.

Will be looking forward to your thoughtful reply... :coffee:
“Please explain how God is not morally culpable for the murder of his only Begotten Son,”

“I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep. As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep. And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.

Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.”
‭‭John‬ ‭10:11, 15-18‬ ‭
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,079
677
113
“Please explain how God is not morally culpable for the murder of his only Begotten Son,”

“I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep. As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep. And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.

Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.”
‭‭John‬ ‭10:11, 15-18‬ ‭
There's that human will matter again. The ultimate use of it in fact and our ultimate guide for our use of it.
 
Oct 19, 2024
4,883
1,055
113
USA-TX
Then your god that you worship is evil, unjust, unrighteous and unfair! How could your god allow any baby to die physically when physical death is the penalty for sin -- when the wages of sin is death!? How is that just?
YOUR God "HATES sin and the sinner!"
Not the God I worship.
The wages of the sin of unbelief is hell,
which babies are too young to be able to commit.
 
Oct 19, 2024
4,883
1,055
113
USA-TX
Yeah, it's pretty simple.

Calvies scale is tipped way into His sovereignty.

Armies scale is tipped way into His Love.

The pivot is INTEGRITY. And Both the calvies and the armies distort the pivot.
The implication being that you do not tip the scale or distort the pivot,
and the Lord knows I try to harmonize both views correctly!
 
Oct 19, 2024
4,883
1,055
113
USA-TX
Ultimately but not in every way. I don't want to debate election, but if God wills that all be saved, and not all are saved, then in a sense God's will has taken a back seat to man's will. Stated differently, God has willingly honored the will of the creature He created to have a will. And God's seemingly obvious ultimate will to have a willingly, faithfully obedient, loving family for His perfect first-born Son takes a back seat to no one and nothing. There's always some dimensional reasoning involved in these things.
Re "if God wills that all be saved, and not all are saved, then in a sense God's will has taken a back seat to man's will": I think the better
conclusion is that although it is God's intentional will for all to be saved, His permissive will allows sinners to resist His intentional will (Deut. 30:19), because MFW is the essential aspect of humanness and God-likeness, thereby allowing or activating love that is different from animal instinct or robotic programming. (This is what allows Rufus to be so disagreeable :^)
 

studier

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2024
3,079
677
113
Re "if God wills that all be saved, and not all are saved, then in a sense God's will has taken a back seat to man's will": I think the better
conclusion is that although it is God's intentional will for all to be saved, His permissive will allows sinners to resist His intentional will (Deut. 30:19), because MFW is the essential aspect of humanness and God-likeness, thereby allowing or activating love that is different from animal instinct or robotic programming. (This is what allows Rufus to be so disagreeable :^)
Understood and appreciated. As time goes on, I simply have found myself setting aside the theological descriptives like intentional and permissive and being more willing to flow with the terminology of the discussion as much as makes sense to me.

I do like what you said that I highlighted above. In all these discussions re: loss of salvation and such, including as in #12,250 above, this matter of MFW as you refer to it and that @Rufus criticizes so adamantly, has become more and more important and pointed and important for me in how I view the Text. It was important before but especially in the loss discussions I can better see that nothing really makes sense if it negates human choice.

Thanks for the comments.
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
1,743
824
113
The implication being that you do not tip the scale or distort the pivot,
and the Lord knows I try to harmonize both views correctly!
'TRY' is the key word.

Concerning salvation and eternal security no need to "TRY."

It's equal privilege and equal opportunity.

All can believe. And All have eternal security.

Draw your theory out.....It's not equal privilege and equal opportunity. Some may forfeit, walk away, jump out of His hand or lose salvation.....Impugning His Justice.
 

Kroogz

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2023
1,743
824
113
YOUR God "HATES sin and the sinner!"
Not the God I worship.
The wages of the sin of unbelief is hell,
which babies are too young to be able to commit.
Yeah. Sorry if I seem tough on you. There is some straight up darkness and evil showing up here.
 
Oct 19, 2024
4,883
1,055
113
USA-TX
Understood and appreciated. As time goes on, I simply have found myself setting aside the theological descriptives like intentional and permissive and being more willing to flow with the terminology of the discussion as much as makes sense to me.

I do like what you said that I highlighted above. In all these discussions re: loss of salvation and such, including as in #12,250 above, this matter of MFW as you refer to it and that @Rufus criticizes so adamantly, has become more and more important and pointed and important for me in how I view the Text. It was important before but especially in the loss discussions I can better see that nothing really makes sense if it negates human choice.

Thanks for the comments.
Yes, and if it negates divine volition and love.
 

BillyBob

Well-known member
Dec 20, 2023
586
274
63
Texas
Nothing in the Bible makes such a claim. God said He didn't want anyone to perish. By that statement from God it's safe to believe He did ordain all humans to live for Him.
Here you go again! Now you claim God ordained all humans to live for Him. Since many do not live for him, then you must believe that we have a very weak God who has control over nothing.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
63,905
32,448
113
Understood and appreciated. As time goes on, I simply have found myself setting aside the theological descriptives like intentional and permissive and being more willing to flow with the terminology of the discussion as much as makes sense to me.

I do like what you said that I highlighted above. In all these discussions re: loss of salvation and such, including as in #12,250 above, this matter of MFW as you refer to it and that @Rufus criticizes so adamantly, has become more and more important and pointed and important for me in how I view the Text. It was important before but especially in the loss discussions I can better see that nothing really makes sense if it negates human choice.

Thanks for the comments.
Seems more like you close your eyes to what the text actually says. As do others.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
63,905
32,448
113
“Please explain how God is not morally culpable for the murder of his only Begotten Son,”

“I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep. As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep. And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.

Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.”
‭‭John‬ ‭10:11, 15-18‬ ‭

John 10 verses 14-16 ~ I am the good shepherd. I know My sheep and My sheep know Me, just as the Father knows Me and I know the Father. And I lay down My life for the sheep. I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring them in as well, and they will listen to My voice. Then there will be one flock and one shepherd.