You don't seem to understand the difference between receiving the Holy Spirit (Acts 10:45; 11:17; 15:8; Romans 5:5 etc..) which is the permanent indwelling of the Holy Spirit at the moment of salvation for all believers (1 Corinthians 12:13; Ephesians 1:13) and being filled with the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:4; 4:8; 4:31; 7:55; 9:7; 13:9; 13:52 etc..) which is a subsequent experience which can be repeated and where the Holy Spirit controls and guides every aspect of us and providing empowerment for ministry, which may or may not be accompanied by speaking in tongues.
I accept His word. I just don't accept your eisegesis or your false gospel of salvation by a rigid baptism formula + speaking in tongues, which is not salvation by faith in Jesus Christ. You don't even believe that Jesus is God, so you have a "different" Jesus. (2 Corinthians 11:4)
Oh, the IRONY.
1 Corinthians 3:11 - For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.
You fail to properly interpret your pet verse here and you also fail to properly harmonize scripture with scripture before reaching your conclusion on doctrine.
The only logical conclusion
when properly harmonizing scripture with scripture is that faith in Jesus Christ "implied in genuine repentance" (rather than water baptism) brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit (
Luke 24:47;
Acts 2:38;
3:19;
5:31;
10:43-47;
11:17,
18;
13:38-39; 15:7-9; 16:31; 26:18).
*Perfect Harmony*
As Greek scholar AT Robertson stated: Change of number from plural to singular and of person from second to third. This change marks a break in the thought here that the English translation does not preserve. The first thing to do is make a radical and complete change of heart and life. Then let each one be baptized after this change has taken place, and the act of baptism be performed “in the name of Jesus Christ” (εν τωι ονοματι Ιησου Χριστου — en tōi onomati Iēsou Christou).
Greek scholar A. T. Robertson authored Word Pictures in the New Testament. In his comments on
Acts 2:38 he said, - “One will decide the use here according as he believes that baptism is essential to the remission of sins or not. "My view is decidedly against the idea that Peter, Paul, or any one in the New Testament taught baptism as essential to the remission of sins or the means of securing such remission.
So, I understand Peter to be urging baptism on each of them who had already turned (repented) and for it to be done in the name of Jesus Christ on the basis of the forgiveness of sins which they had already received.” The illustrations of both usages are numerous in the N.T. and the Koin, generally (Robertson, Grammar, page 592).
Acts 2 - Robertson's Word Pictures in the New Testament - Bible Commentaries - StudyLight.org
Actually, I have received the Holy Spirit several years ago when I came to repent and believe the gospel/place my faith in Jesus Christ alone for salvation. (Acts 10:43; 11:17; 15:7-9; Ephesians 1:13) Unlike you, my faith is exclusively in Jesus Christ for salvation and is not in water baptism or any other works. Don't confuse receiving the Holy Spirit with your charismatic chaos.
I have not changed His word. I read His word in context then properly harmonize scripture with scripture before reaching my conclusion on doctrine, as I already shared with you a number of times, but you have your pet verses and your pet doctrines, and you are not interested in seriously considering the truth.