Jesus said the law would stand until it was fulfilled, and the New Testament says Christ fulfilled it. Acts 15 specifically addressed whether Gentiles must keep the Law of Moses and never required Sabbath observance. Paul even says not to let anyone judge believers regarding Sabbaths in Colossians 2:16. If the Sabbath were required for Christians, the apostles would have clearly commanded it to the Gentile churches, but the New Testament never does.
I want to walk through this carefully because honestly this argument sounds really convincing at first glance for someone not understand scripture and I understand why people could find it persuasive. But when you actually sit with each point and go back to what Jesus Himself said the whole thing starts to unravel pretty quickly. Let me show you what I mean. BTY, I have already explained most of this several times.
The first claim is that Christ fulfilled the law so it no longer stands.
This is built on a misreading of what Jesus actually said and it is worth reading His words slowly because He was very deliberate here:
Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets. I am not come to destroy but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you till heaven and earth pass away one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments and shall teach men so shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven. (Matthew 5:17-19)
The Greek word for fulfil is pleroo and it means to fill something to its fullest and deepest meaning, not to finish it off and throw it away. Think about it this way. When you fulfil a promise you do not abolish the promise. You bring it to its complete reality. Jesus was saying He came to show the law in its deepest and truest meaning, which is exactly what He did throughout the Sermon on the Mount going deeper into the heart behind every commandment.
And here is something I find really compelling about this passage. Jesus warned in the very same breath that anyone who breaks one of the least commandments and teaches others to do so will be called least in the kingdom of heaven. You simply do not warn people against breaking rules that are about to disappear. That makes no sense at all. He confirmed the commandments as a living permanent standard right there in the same sentence as the fulfillment statement.
On top of that Jesus said not one jot or tittle would pass until all is fulfilled. Has everything been fulfilled yet? Has the resurrection of all the dead happened? Has the final judgment taken place? Has the new heaven and earth arrived? The answer to all of those is no. So by Jesus own words the law is still standing.
Now on Acts 15 I think it is really important to understand what that council was actually dealing with because this argument misrepresents it. Like I explained before several times, the specific crisis was whether Gentiles needed to be circumcised for salvation. That was the question. The four practical requirements the council gave were urgent guidelines to help brand new Gentile believers coming straight out of paganism to live alongside Jewish believers without causing immediate offense and stumbling. They were never meant to be a complete list of every commandment a Christian would ever keep for the rest of their life.
To say the Sabbath is abolished because Acts 15 did not mention it is what logicians call an argument from silence and it falls apart immediately when you apply it consistently. Acts 15 also never mentioned murder or adultery. Nobody concludes from that silence that murder is now fine for Gentile Christians.
The same logic has to apply consistently or it does not work at all.
And honestly the detail that almost everyone skips over in Acts 15 is what James said right after giving those four requirements:
For Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach him being read in the synagogues every sabbath day. (Acts 15:21)
James was pointing out that Gentile believers would have ongoing opportunity to learn God's ways because Moses was read every Sabbath in the synagogues. The quiet assumption built right into Acts 15 itself is that Gentile believers would be present on the Sabbath learning Scripture. That is pretty much the opposite of the council concluding the Sabbath does not apply to Gentiles.
On Colossians 2:16 this is honestly the verse I see misused most often in. Paul was writing to believers in Colossae who were being harassed and judged by people pushing a very specific false religious system involving angel worship, extreme asceticism and man made rules. He was telling them not to let these outsiders condemn them regarding their practice. He was not telling them to stop observing these things. That is a genuinely important distinction that changes the meaning of the verse completely.
And here is something that gets missed almost every time.
The sabbath days mentioned in Colossians 2:16 refer to the ceremonial sabbaths of the Mosaic calendar, the annual feast sabbaths like Passover, the Day of Atonement and the Feast of Tabernacles. These were indeed shadows and types pointing forward to Christ and His redemptive work. But the weekly seventh day Sabbath established at creation is in a completely different category. It was set apart before sin entered the world, before Israel existed, before any ceremonial system was ever given. It was never a shadow pointing to something else. It was a permanent gift of rest that God built into the very rhythm of creation itself, blessed it and sanctified it on that specific day:
And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. (Genesis 2:3)
You cannot lump those two things together and treat them as the same, it is a grave mistake doing so.
On the final claim that if the Sabbath were required the apostles would have clearly commanded it, this misunderstands something really fundamental. The Sabbath was never the apostles idea to command or not command. It was God's command established at creation and confirmed by Jesus Himself as its Lord:
The sabbath was made for man and not man for the sabbath. Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath.(Mark 2:27-28)
Think about that for a moment. You cannot be Lord of something that no longer exists. A king is not lord of a kingdom he just dissolved. When Jesus declared Himself Lord of the Sabbath He was claiming ownership and authority over it. And He said it was made for man, the Greek word anthropos meaning all of humanity, not just the Jewish people.
Here is the thing that I keep coming back to in this whole discussion.
There is not a single verse in any of the four Gospels where Jesus says the Sabbath is abolished, moved to a different day or made optional for His followers. Not one. Jesus addressed the Sabbath multiple times in His ministry and every single time He talked about its true meaning and purpose.
He never once said it was ending.
That silence from Jesus on abolishing the Sabbath while declaring Himself its Lord is one of the most powerful confirmations that it still stands exactly where God placed it.
And the writer of Hebrews sealed it with one carefully chosen word writing to New Covenant believers:
There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God. (Hebrews 4:9)
The word translated rest there is the Greek word sabbatismos which literally means a keeping of the Sabbath. The writer had plenty of other Greek words for rest available to him and he chose that one deliberately. And he said it remaineth. Still there. Still waiting. Still for God's people under the New Covenant.
So here is where I land on all of this. This argument takes some genuine truths and then draws conclusions from them that the actual texts do not support and that Jesus directly contradicts. The Sabbath was established at creation by God, confirmed by Jesus as its Lord, declared as remaining for God's people by the writer of Hebrews and never abolished by a single word from the mouth of Christ. And His words are the standard everything else gets measured by:
Heaven and earth shall pass away but my words shall not pass away. (Matthew 24:35)
I hope this is clear now and I will not explain this again to you.