did Christ retrun in AD 70? Matthew 24

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

Hurricane1

Guest
what fig tree cursing are you speaking of. I see no cursing of a fig tree in matt 24.
Exactly, he was refering to when Jesus cursed a fig tree bacause it wasn't bearing fruit when He was hungry. Somehow, he thought I was taliking about that fig tree.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Please go back and read again, I never asserted that the fig tree that Jesus cursed was Israel... you did. All I said is that the fig tree in the parable was a representation of Israel today.
I would disagree with you. it had nothing to do with Isreal today or back then
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
Please go back and read again, I never asserted that the fig tree that Jesus cursed was Israel... you did. All I said is that the fig tree in the parable was a representation of Israel today.
But if you say the fig tree in the parable is Israel, then you have to to say the cursed one was Israel too! It's inconsistent to say one is and one isn't.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Exactly, he was refering to when Jesus cursed a fig tree bacause it wasn't bearing fruit when He was hungry. Somehow, he thought I was taliking about that fig tree.

ok I think I have fig trees confused. which fig tree are you speaking off? in matt 24 or matt 21?
 
H

Hurricane1

Guest
I would disagree with you. it had nothing to do with Isreal today or back then
Then what was Jesus refering to when He said that parable? Was He just talking to hear His own voice? Or was He trying to tell them something?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
No he said THAT temple that THEY saw. Everything in this passage is linked to THAT temple. He's speaking to them when he says...

Luke 21

5 Then, as some spoke of the temple, how it was adorned with beautiful stones and donations, He said, 6 “These things which you see—the days will come in which not one stone shall be left upon another that shall not be thrown down.”

That happened in 70 ad and everything in this passage is linked to the time period this happened in.

Luke 21
20 “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation is near. 21 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those who are in the midst of her depart, and let not those who are in the country enter her. 22 For these are the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled


The YOU SEE is linked to the THESE THINGS.

He wasn't speaking of a future temple, because he was pointing to the temple that existed THEN.
did you read my take on matt 24?, He could not have been speaking of that temple. because all the signs jesus said would occure could not have happened before 70 AD. you must take the whole of the passage in context.

Yes, jesus spoke of that temple being destroyed, but he never spoke of the abomination happening in that temple. He said the abomination would occure AFTER the signs he said would be the beginning of sorrows. So when did these signs exist? before 70 ad? then the temple might be the one they saw. If not, but they happen after (which I showed) then it could not be that temple.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
The fig tree reference in Matthew 24 isn't a prophecy. It's an illustration, pointing to the stuff he just said.

32 “Now learn this parable from the fig tree: When its branch has already become tender and puts forth leaves, you know that summer is near. 33 So you also, when you see all these things, know that it[d] is near—at the doors! 34 Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place. 35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will by no means pass away.

He's using the fig tree example as an illustration to say, that when you see ALL THESE THINGS, then you know the season is near.

The ALL THESE THINGS isn't the fig tree. It's all the things he talked about before using that illustration.

The fig tree is an illustration, not a prophecy.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
did you read my take on matt 24?, He could not have been speaking of that temple. because all the signs jesus said would occure could not have happened before 70 AD. you must take the whole of the passage in context.

Yes, jesus spoke of that temple being destroyed, but he never spoke of the abomination happening in that temple. He said the abomination would occure AFTER the signs he said would be the beginning of sorrows. So when did these signs exist? before 70 ad? then the temple might be the one they saw. If not, but they happen after (which I showed) then it could not be that temple.
Yes I read your reply ,and earlier in the post I showed how those things DID come to pass. I'm not retyping again, cuz I'm not a fan of banging my head against a rock.:p
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,404
6,686
113
Then what was Jesus refering to when He said that parable? Was He just talking to hear His own voice? Or was He trying to tell them something?
When Jesus, Yeshua, cursed the fig tree, and later the apostles recalled and it had withered, they were astounded. Yeshua asked them why the amazement, they could do the same and more if they just had the faith. I believe this also is a demonstration of what happens to those who after coming to Yeshua do not yield fruit........right?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
The fig tree reference in Matthew 24 isn't a prophecy. It's an illustration, pointing to the stuff he just said.

32 “Now learn this parable from the fig tree: When its branch has already become tender and puts forth leaves, you know that summer is near. 33 So you also, when you see all these things, know that it[d] is near—at the doors! 34 Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place. 35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will by no means pass away.

He's using the fig tree example as an illustration to say, that when you see ALL THESE THINGS, then you know the season is near.

The ALL THESE THINGS isn't the fig tree. It's all the things he talked about before using that illustration.

The fig tree is an illustration, not a prophecy.
yes, I agree with this 100 % which makes me wonder which fig tree he is talking about..lol
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Yes I read your reply ,and earlier in the post I showed how those things DID come to pass. I'm not retyping again, cuz I'm not a fan of banging my head against a rock.:p
I will have to look for it. where was it much earlier or much later.

but I don't see how they could have, how many wars occured between matt 24 and 70 Ad, how many kingdoms went against kingdom in that same time frame?? it makes no sense. and that is why i can not buy into the fact they have occured.
 
H

Hurricane1

Guest
ok I think I have fig trees confused. which fig tree are you speaking off? in matt 24 or matt 21?
Matt. 24:32“Now learn this lesson from the fig tree: As soon as its twigs get tender and its leaves come out, you know that summer is near.</SPAN> 33Even so, when you see all these things, you know that itd is near, right at the door.</SPAN> 34I tell you the truth, this generatione will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.</SPAN> 35Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.</SPAN>
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
yes, I agree with this 100 % which makes me wonder which fig tree he is talking about..lol
Ok let me try this for the guzillionth time.

Matthew 21

18 Now in the morning, as He returned to the city, He was hungry. 19 And seeing a fig tree by the road, He came to it and found nothing on it but leaves, and said to it, “Let no fruit grow on you ever again.” Immediately the fig tree withered away.


Here is the point that I/others are trying to make.

if you say that the fig tree in Matthew 24 is Israel, then to be consistent in your Bible interpretation, you also have to say the fig tree in Matt 21 is also Israel.

Now if Jesus said the fig tree will NEVER bear fruit again, then those who say the fig tree in Matthew 24 represents a future Israel, well there is an obvious problem!

Again I'm NOT saying that all this points to a future Israel. I'm simply pointing out the contradiction/difficulties people have when the go saying fig tree=Israel.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
I will have to look for it. where was it much earlier or much later.

but I don't see how they could have, how many wars occured between matt 24 and 70 Ad, how many kingdoms went against kingdom in that same time frame?? it makes no sense. and that is why i can not buy into the fact they have occured.
We're not going to agree on our interpretation of events. But at least have a read through it, so you can see where I'm coming from. I know where you're coming from cuz I used to believe your interpretation.
 
H

Hurricane1

Guest
When Jesus, Yeshua, cursed the fig tree, and later the apostles recalled and it had withered, they were astounded. Yeshua asked them why the amazement, they could do the same and more if they just had the faith. I believe this also is a demonstration of what happens to those who after coming to Yeshua do not yield fruit........right?
Yes, I agree with that. I'm not talking about that. I am talking about Matt 24:32.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
The big thing to look at is the timeline of both dan 9 and matt 24.

According to daniel nine,

1. after 69 weeks the messiah gets cut off.
2. Then the temple is destroyed (70 AD)
3. then wars and desolation will occure until a time is determined, this time is not given as to how long it will be.
4. Then the abomination of desolation.
5. the end of the age

According to matt 24.

1. The messiah had already been cut off. so this was fulfilled.
2. Jesus prophesied of the temple being destroyed (70AD)
3. Jesus said there would be wars and rumors of wars. kingdom will rise against kingdom and nation against nation (this is the wars and desolation of undetermined time mentioned in dan 9)
4. Then, after these things (which jesus called the beginning of sorrows, the end is not yet) we see the abomination of desolation
5. then we see the end of the age, the return of Christ.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Yes, I agree with that. I'm not talking about that. I am talking about Matt 24:32.
Matt 24: 32 has nothign to do with any nation. It is Jesus saying that just as you can tell the season by seeing the fig tree, when you see the signs he gave, you know the time (or season) is near.
 
H

Hurricane1

Guest
Ok let me try this for the guzillionth time.

Matthew 21

18 Now in the morning, as He returned to the city, He was hungry. 19 And seeing a fig tree by the road, He came to it and found nothing on it but leaves, and said to it, “Let no fruit grow on you ever again.” Immediately the fig tree withered away.


Here is the point that I/others are trying to make.

if you say that the fig tree in Matthew 24 is Israel, then to be consistent in your Bible interpretation, you also have to say the fig tree in Matt 21 is also Israel.

Now if Jesus said the fig tree will NEVER bear fruit again, then those who say the fig tree in Matthew 24 represents a future Israel, well there is an obvious problem!

Again I'm NOT saying that all this points to a future Israel. I'm simply pointing out the contradiction/difficulties people have when the go saying fig tree=Israel.

okay, let's go there. Just because Israel comes back into existence doesn't mean it will ever bear fruit for the Lord again. That time has passed, now the Christian Church bears fruit for the Lord.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
okay, let's go there. Just because Israel comes back into existence doesn't mean it will ever bear fruit for the Lord again. That time has passed, now the Christian Church bears fruit for the Lord.
Yes you and I agree on this.

Again, I'm not arguing for a future temple and all that stuff.
 
H

Hurricane1

Guest
Matt 24: 32 has nothign to do with any nation. It is Jesus saying that just as you can tell the season by seeing the fig tree, when you see the signs he gave, you know the time (or season) is near.

As with many things Jesus said, I believe it has a double meaning. Just like revelation has a double fulfillment. It absolutely happened in 70AD, but Jesus did not return on the clouds as promised. I am sure that would be recorded in the history of every nation on earth. Thus, there has to be a more complete fulfillment coming. If you look at biblical prophesy, time and time again, there was a fulfillment in the natural world and then a fulfillment in the spiritual realm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.