I left all traditional churches. they all have issues. even my church is not perfect. but it more resembles the origional churches of the NT than any church I have been too. and I have learned and grown more at this church over the last 5 than i did in 30 some years of the traditional church.
I don;t trust orthodoxy because of their works based gospel is no different than Catholicism, as for as evangelical vs fundamentalism. I am not sure there is really a difference.
Interesting. No "church" is going to be perfect, this side of paradise, because they're filled with people, who are imperfect. We can try to follow Christ, but we always miss the mark, and for that reason, no church on earth is ever going to get it quite right, 100% "complete." We are incomplete without Jesus.
I'd be interested in hearing how you define "traditional church," and what issues they had.
I attended a church for a while that was, I think, the closest any church could come to 1st century Christians. About half of the members -- roughly 10 people -- lived together in a large home, which they purchased together as an intentional community. They pooled their resources to support what was their living quarters, ministry center, worship center, etc. Worship was in the living room: the rest of us joined for worship. And then those of us who were members stuck around for other stuff -- Bible study, ministry to others, etc. We took on specific causes as we saw need and were able. Peace was one of the biggest ministries, but there were lots of others. Members held each other accountable. Membership was quite limited. Unlike a lot of churches, where you just show up for a while and say "I wanna be a member" and then you're a member. You had to make a commitment, and breaking that commitment was tough. When I left the community to move to another area, it was hard -- they let me leave, because they saw that God was calling me to a different ministry, but no other church will ever be quite like that.