1. Readers....... Not once did God EVER require man to keep His laws perfectly.
1.The sacrifices required spotless lambs; red heifers with 'no white hairs'.
That's ALL God's law stated. purity of the sacrifice was an ultimatum.
(Read)
2.Not once did God ever TELL man that His laws must be kept perfectly.
2.This statement is obtuse, and therefore useless. The reference to the sacrifices state otherwise. - The sacrifices had to be without blemish.
3.He asks that we keep them....but NEVER did He require that we keep them perfectly.
3.Now the 10 commandments have become the ten 'askings'
4.Nowhere will you EVER find in all of God's word this definition for sin: "Sin is falling short of the appointed mark."
4. Nowhere in scripture will you find the definition of anything.
5. But you will find this definition for sin both in the OT and NT: "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law."
5. That is not a true definition. That is an effect of sin.
It is not a definition, it is an effect. That is akin to saying
water is wet. (look that one up) - Does the effect of water on something make it wet? Yes, water makes a thing wet; just like sin juxtaposed to the law of God makes a trespass.
Let's do as God's words tell us to do for correct doctrine;
Yes, let's.
2 Tim.3
[16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
a.) So all scripture - (the sacrificial laws of animals without spot or blemish) - is given by inspiration of God,
b.) and is profitable for doctrine-(The perfect sacrifice/propitiation),
c.) for reproof(see the significance of the spotless lamb and first born without blemish),
d.) for correction(just in case you missed it - myriads of sacrifices will show you),
e.) for instruction in righteousness!(see a disconnect here?)
The OP says God doesn't require perfect righteousness.