P
psychomom
Guest
Postmodernism has been difficult to define because it has many faces and many degrees. For the purpose of theology, it's focus is primarily the domain of epistemology. Postmodernism is in part a rejection of the epistemology of the Enlightenment and a rejection of approaches that are positivist, rationalistic, exclusive, and certain.
Yet postmodernism has many degrees. In the first half of the last century, avant-garde thinkers argued, with great persuasiveness, that for finite human beings there can be no uninterpreted facts. In the second half of the 20th century, many extrapolated this argument to conclude that there are no facts, only interpretations. The latter is toxic insisting that we are confined to a quagmire of relativity, that all meaning is merely a result of linguistic markers that occurred in neo-Darwinism, and that there is no (e.g. zero) possibility of any objective truth.
How am I doing so far Rachel?
I think you'll find your 'avant-garde thinkers' were cultural Marxists.