Falling back slain in the spirit?

Other than the Holy Spirit...no. I think they would throw out John the Baptist today and give him a prescription take two and call in the morning. or another example.

When God gave over the apostate Jew to that which they should not of because of their jealously of the surrounding Pagan nation .Not wanting to walk by faith . The peoples choice was Saul having all the right looks and mannerism but failed to love the word of God.

Then it was God's choice choosing David the beloved one as to the meaning of his name to be used as a type of Christ, coming as our bloody savoior. And Samauel went to the house of Jesse but the 11 brothers had threw out David sent him out to tend the stinky lambs. as it would seem they might of been embarrassed, the guy David writing all these poems seemed like a religious fanatic . they needed what they hoped was separation from the church and state (impossible) God knew one of the 12 was missing.

Do you know anyone that has been healed hundred or thousands of thousands of times from different aliments throughout their lives and end of dying in the end? Or do all die not receiving the promise of a new incorruptible body therefore we have a living hope that will not disappoint us coming from the peace of God that surpasses all human understanding a hope that rising above all hope?

Need a sign? Believe God.

You missed the miracle. The man was a heavenly being. Possibly angel.

Sometimes these posts give me a headache too.

Bad hermeneutics is bad hermeneutics, not "different" hermeneutics. Again, you don't find the truth of a principle by looking for examples where it is not used. You get the understanding of a word by looking at where it is used.

Please don't spin what I wrote and waste your time responding to what I didn't write. Blasphemy is not mere "violation of the commandments". That idea simply doesn't appear in Scripture.

No, it isn't. Again, that idea doesn't appear in Scripture. The closest thing is the passage you quoted from Numbers, but there the concept is defiant, intentional sin, not merely "violation".

Not in Scripture it isn't.

They used the term "blasphemy" correctly in this case, but they applied it incorrectly as Jesus was not committing blasphemy. The context demonstrates that their use of it was based on Jesus' self-identification as God.

This passage does not add "to the witness [that] blasphemy violates the commandments". That idea simply isn't in the text.

Again, "blasphemy" is not in that passage. You can't use a passage to define a word where that word isn't in the passage. You can't defend any statement about blasphemy using this passage, because such is an argument from silence.

Those sent alone? Giving rise to the one meaning of the word apostle?

Yes the word of God, prophecy was sent by the sent ones (apostle) alone as God worked in the to both will and do his good pleasure they performed His will . Its interesting that in context to that he says don't murmur Because it is God who does work in us .it would seem to be to humble mankind not to eat to much honey but swallow some pride.

I would think we world use His Logos as a perfect law. Yes laws are needed to protect oneself as well as others . God's law is love. His gospel is peace.

The law of the faith of God protects and defends us as it is written I would think it would be why apologist defend the faith that does defend us like the sword of His Spirit.

Bad hermeneutics is bad hermeneutics, not "different" hermeneutics. Again, you don't find the truth of a principle by looking for examples where it is not used. You get the understanding of a word by looking at where it is used.

Well how is it used with Peter in Mathew 16:22 -23?

.

Intentional sin like that of Peter addressed as Satan.? "Peter get behind me" you are to have no gods before me.

Some say Peter is the it in which the gates of hell could never prevail against in Mathew 16 . Is that what Mathew 16 :22 -23 is trying to convey ?

From whose silence?

If as you imagine the man was a heavenly being, he then would not have needed to drive the tractor, he could have just moved it at will.
He also would not have needed to perform CPR.

The wife said they offered the man money, a ride into town, something to eat, and the man said he was on a schedule but it was based upon him walking. They said they watched him walk down the road, which goes down a slight incline and you can see for what appears for miles, and he just vanished. They hopped into the wife's car and drove to where they thought they last saw the man, and then drove past another mile or so. They never saw the man again.

Smh

I can see if it were a man, that he would then attempt to drive the tractor, as that is all a human can be expected to do.
An angelic heavenly being, however, is not restricted by the laws of science, and as such would have been able to move the tractor at will, and would have been able to tell an injured or dead individual to rise without performing CPR.

It isn't!

Here is the passage. If you can find the word, "blasphemy" in there, in any form, you quote it back, highlighted.

Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee. But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

Peter's sin was NOT intentional in that situation. It's irrelevant.

An argument from silence is a fallacy; it means that the source material being referenced, in this case the Bible, does not say anything about the subject being addressed.

So, the answer to "whose silence?" is "God's!"

Don't you think that even heavenly beings can do things too in and on the earth? I have had angelic encounters. They can look like men, speak like men, and act like men. And then again they may not. They all are restricted to the will of God!

Hahaha, agreed!!

But in my view of miracles, I do not believe the result (the miracle) has to be immediate to the action (prayer + faith). It can be. But God has a way of doing things that not only glorifies Himself, but leaves a lasting impression on everyone with knowledge to what God did.

In my opinion, the true miracle was this farmers sudden and urgent desire to seek Christ as his personal Lord and Savior.

But the lasting impression, is this farmer should be dead, but obviously God had His angel prepared, to save this farmer (for not just this farmers sake (which the farmer will relate to as accepting God to this miracle and it will become a stronghold in his faith and walk in God) but for those of us in the congregation to hear the farmer and his wife claim what had happened).

So I definitely believe when the pastor/believers with faith lays hands upon those requesting prayer, the miracle does not always have to be instant (but there are times it will be and has been), but generally, the miracle was sparked and takes place later on.

And to me, this is just the same as had the miracle been instant!!

I believe the reason the tractor was driven and the man claimed he had never been around a tractor, but did it perfectly, was to be a resounding point directly to the farmer himself. This man just gave his life to God. And then from nowhere, someone with no knowledge like the farmer possessed (operating farm equipment), operated the farm equipment to save his life. Only those of us who live on farms and operate such equipment understand using the clutch, placing it in gear, is literally nothing like you use a clutch and shift gears in a car. So, it resonates more by having someone never around such equipment, but had excellent knowledge to operate in order to save the farmers life.

It is a miracle this thread has gone on so long and nobody has fallen asleep out of the window.

I just saw one post that explained what eisigesis meant.

I thought it meant Easy Jesus.

Satan also has the meaning of adversary which I think best fits the context.

I have also heard that we came from monkeys, little green aliens exist, the word is flat and politicians tell the truth............and the point is obvious.........